Abstract
Drawing on Charles Peirce’s descriptions of his correspondence course on the “Art of Reasoning,” I argue that Peirce believed that the study of logic stands at the center of a liberal arts education. However, Peirce’s notion of logic included much more than the traditional accounts of deduction and syllogistic reasoning. He believed that the art of reasoning required a study of both abductive and inductive inference as well the practice of observation and imagination. Employing these other features of logic, his course foreshadowed a number of developments in twentieth century educational theory: the belief that non-traditional students should be educated, the claim that the art of reasoning (or critical reasoning) was important to all theoretical practices, and that the art of reasoning was important to the overall growth of a person. The upshot is that Peirce’s course in the art of reasoning should make us reconsider making logic courses, under Peirce’s broad conception of logic, required courses in high school and higher education.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bell Hooks (1990) Yearning: race, gender, and cultural politics South End Press Boston
Peirce Charles. (1931–35, 1958). Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Volumes I–VII, eds. Hartshorne et al. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press
Peirce Charles. (1979). Charles Sanders Peirce: Contributions to “The Nation,” Volume 3, eds. Ketner and Cook. Lubbock: Texas Tech Press
Peirce Charles. (1985). Historical perspectives on Peirce’s logic of science, ed. C. Eisele. New York: Mouton Publishers
Peirce Charles. (2000). Writings of Charles S. Peirce, Volume 6, ed. N. Houser et al. Bloomington: Indiana University Press
Peirce Charles. (ND). Manuscript collection of Charles S. Peirce. Houghton Library, Harvard University
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Anderson, D. Peirce and the Art of Reasoning. Stud Philos Educ 24, 277–289 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-005-3849-9
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-005-3849-9