Abstract
Reproductive counseling includes counseling of prospective parents by obstetricians, clinical geneticists, and genetic counselors regarding, for example, the use of assisted reproductive technologies, prenatal testing, and preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Two different views on wisdom and the goal of reproductive counseling are analyzed. According to the first view, the goal of reproductive counseling is to help prospective parents reach a wise decision. A specific course of action is recommended by the counselor in contrast to other possible alternatives. According to the second view, the goal of reproductive counseling is not to help prospective parents reach a wise decision but to help them reach their own decision wisely. It is the prospective parents who should make the decision, and it is their value commitments that should be decisive. It is argued that the second approach is to be preferred to the first. It combines respect for autonomy with a recognition of the need for assistance in decision-making. Both the first and second views relate the goal of reproductive counseling to wisdom. A problem is, however, what wisdom more precisely means — there are many different views. A casuistic view of wisdom is investigated. This view roughly defines wisdom as practical prudence in dealing with particular cases. What characterizes a casuistic decision-making method is elaborated in more detail. Applied to the second view, a casuistic view of wisdom implies that the counselor should encourage prospective parents to take into consideration the nature of the particular problem at hand, the context of the problem, their own individual identities, their personal value commitments, and various alternative perspectives, values and arguments.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bernhardt, B.A. et al.: 1998, 'Prenatal Genetic Testing: Content of Discussions between Obstetric Providers and Pregnant Women', Obstet. Gynecol. 91, 648–655.
Biesecker, B.B. and T.M. Marteau: 1999, 'The Future of Genetic Counselling: An International Perspective', Nature Genetics 22, 133–137.
Brody, B.A.: 1988, Life and Death Decision Making. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Brody, B.A.: 1988, The Ethics of Biomedical Research: An International Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Clarke, A. (ed.): 1994, Genetic Counselling: Practice and Principles. London: Routledge.
Johnson M.: 1993, Moral Imagination: Implications of Cognitive Science for Ethics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Jonsen, A.R.: 1995, 'Casuistry: An Alternative or Supplement to Principles?', Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 5(3), 237–251.
Jonsen, A.R. and S. Toulmin: 1988, The Abuse of Casuistry: A History of Moral Reasoning. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Juengst, E.T.: 1995, ' "Prevention" and the Goals of Genetic Medicine', Human Gene Therapy 6, 1595–1605.
Karp, L.E.: 1983, 'The Terrible Question', American Journal of Medical Genetics 23, 359–362.
Lippman, A. and B.S. Wilfond: 1992, 'Twice-Told Tales: Stories About Genetic Disorders', American Journal of Human Genetics 51, 936–937.
Mao, X. and D.C. Wertz: 1997, 'China's Genetic Services Providers' Attitudes towards Several Ethical Issues: A Cross-Cultural Study', Clinical Genetics 52, 100–109.
Marteau, T.M., J. Kidd and M. Plenicar: 1993, 'Obstetricians Presenting Amniocentesis to Pregnant Women: Practice Observed', J. Reprod. Infant Psych. 11, 3–10.
Marteau, T. et al.: 1994, 'Counselling Following Diagnosis of Fetal Abnormality: A Comparison between German, Portuguese and UK Geneticists', Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2, 96–102.
Marteau, T. and M. Richards (eds.): 1996, The Troubled Helix. Social and Psychological Implications of the New Human Genetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Murray, T.H.: 1996, The Worth of a Child. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Nordgren, A.: 1998a, 'Ethics and Imagination: Implications of Cognitive Semantics for Medical Ethics', Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 19(2), 117–141.
Nordgren, A.: 1998b, 'Reprogenetics Policy: Three Kinds of Models', Community Genetics 1, 61–70.
Nordgren, A.: 2001, Responsible Genetics: The Moral Responsibility of Geneticists for the Consequences of Human Genetics Research. Philosophy and Medicine series Vol. 70. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Penchaszadeh, V.B. and B. Beiguelman: 1998, 'Medical Genetics Services in Latin America: Report of a Meeting of Experts', Rev. Panam. Salud Publica 3, 409–420.
Shiloh, S.: 1996, 'Decision-Making in the Context of Genetic Risk', in: T. Marteau (ed.), pp. 82-103.
Strong, C.: 1997, Ethics in Reproductive and Perinatal Medicine: A New Framework. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Toon, P.D.: 1993, 'After Bioethics and towards Virtue?', Journal of Medical Ethics 19, 17–18
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nordgren, A. Wisdom, casuistry, and the goal of reproductive counseling. Med Health Care Philos 5, 281–289 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021105606636
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021105606636