Abstract
Descartes' image of the tree of knowledge from the preface to the French edition of the Principles of Philosophy is usually taken to represent Descartes' break with the past and with the fragmentation of knowledge of the schools. But if Descartes' tree of knowledge is analyzed in its proper context, another interpretation emerges. A series of contrasts with other classifications of knowledge from the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries raises some puzzles: claims of originality and radical break from the past do not seem warranted. Further contrasts with Descartes' unpublished writings and with school doctrines lead to the ironic conclusion that, in the famous passage, Descartes is attempting to appeal to conventional wisdom and trying to avoid sounding novel.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ariew, R.: 1992, ‘Descartes and Scholasticism: The Intellectual Background to Descartes' Thought’, in J. Cottingham (ed.), Cambridge Companion to Descartes, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 58–90.
Bacon, F.: 1605, The Advancement of Learning, reprint Da Capo Press, New York.
Bacon, R.: 1859, Opera Hactenus Inedita, ed. by J. S. Brewer, Kraus reprint, London.
Bacon, R.: 1928, Opus maius, ed. by J. H. Bridges, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia.
Carbone, L.: 1597, Additamenta (to Francicus Toletus' Logica), Juntas, Venice.
Carbone, L.: 1599, Introductio in Universam philosophiam, N. A. Zalterium, Venice.
Clavius, C.: 1901, ‘Modus quo disciplinae mathematicae in scholis Societatis possent promoveri’, in Monumenta Paedagogica Societatis Jesu quae Primam Rationem Studiorum anno 1586 praecessere. A. Avrial, Matriti, pp. 471–74.
Crombie, A. C.: 1953, Robert Grosseteste and the Origins of Experimental Science, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Crombie, A. C.: 1977, ‘Mathematics and Platonism in Sixteenth-Century Italian Universities and in Jesuit Educational Policy’, in Y. Maeyama and W. G. Saltzer (eds.), Prismata, Naturwissenschaftsgeschichtliche Studien, Franz Steinerverlag, Wiesbaden, pp. 63–94.
D'Alembert, J.: 1951–52, Discours Préliminaire, Gonthier, Paris.
D'Alembert, J.: 1963, Preliminary Discourse to the Encyclopedia of of Diderot, trans. by R. N. Schwab, Macmillan, New York.
Darnton, R.: 1984, The Great Cat Massacre, Basic Books, New York.
Dear, P.: 1987, ‘Jesuit Mathematical Science and the Reconstitution of Experience in the Early Seventeenth Century’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 18, 133–75.
Dear, P.: 1988, Mersenne and the Learning of the Schools, Cornell University Press, Ithaca.
Descartes, R.: 1973–76, Oeuvres de Descartes, ed. by C. Adam and P. Tannery, Vrin, Paris.
Diderot, D.: 1969–73, Oeuvres complètes, Le Club français du Livre, Paris.
Foucault, M.: 1970, The Order of Things, Vintage Books, London.
Grene, M.: 1985, Descartes, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.
Gueroult, M.: 1985, Descartes' Philosophy According to the Order of Reasons, trans. by R. Ariew, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.
Kraus, P. A.: 1983, ‘From Universal Mathematics to Universal Method: Descartes's ‘Turn’ in Rule IV of the Regulae’, Journal of the History of Philosophy 22, 159–74.
Livesay, S. J.: 1990, ‘Science and Theology in the Fourteenth Century: The Subalternate Sciences in Oxford Commentaries on the Sentences’, Synthese 83, 273–93.
Marion, J.-L.: 1981, Sur l'ontologie grise de Descartes, Vrin, Paris.
Matthews, M. R. (ed.): 1989, The Scientific Background to Modern Philosophy, Hackett, Indianapolis.
Ovitt, G.: 1983, ‘The Status of the Mechanical Arts in Medieval Classification of Learning’, Viator 14, 89–105.
Proclus: 1970, Commentary on the First Book of Euclid's Elements, trans. by E. Morrow, Princeton Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
Rochemonteix, C. de: 1889, Un collège de Jésuites aux 17e et 18e siècles: le Collège Henri IV de la Flèche, Leguicheux, Le Mans.
Wallace, W.: 1984, Galileo and His Sources, The Heritage of the Collegio Romano in Galileo's Science, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
Weber, J.-P.: 1964, La constitution du texte des Regulae, Société d'édition d'enseignement supérieur, Paris.
Weisheipl, J. A.: 1978, ‘The Nature, Scope, and Classification of the Sciences’, in D. C. Lindberg (ed.), Science in the Middle Ages, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 461–82.
Weisheipl, J. A.: 1985, ‘Classification of Sciences in Medieval Thought’, in W. E. Carroll (ed.), Nature and Motion in the Middle Ages, Catholic University Press, Washington, pp. 203–37.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ariew, R. Descartes and the tree of knowledge. Synthese 92, 101–116 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00413744
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00413744