Skip to main content
Log in

Leibniz’s Theory of Space

  • Published:
Foundations of Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper I offer a fresh interpretation of Leibniz’s theory of space, in which I explain the connection of his relational theory to both his mathematical theory of analysis situs and his theory of substance. I argue that the elements of his mature theory are not bare bodies (as on a standard relationalist view) nor bare points (as on an absolutist view), but situations. Regarded as an accident of an individual body, a situation is the complex of its angles and distances to other co-existing bodies, founded in the representation or state of the substance or substances contained in the body. The complex of all such mutually compatible situations of co-existing bodies constitutes an order of situations, or instantaneous space. Because these relations of situation change from one instant to another, space is an accidental whole that is continuously changing and becoming something different, and therefore a phenomenon. As Leibniz explains to Clarke, it can be represented mathematically by supposing some set of existents hypothetically (and counterfactually) to remain in a fixed mutual relation of situation, and gauging all subsequent situations in terms of transformations with respect to this initial set. Space conceived in terms of such allowable transformations is the subject of Analysis Situs. Finally, insofar as space is conceived in abstraction from any bodies that might individuate the situations, it encompasses all possible relations of situation. This abstract space, the order of all possible situations, is an abstract entity, and therefore ideal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arthur, R. T. W. (1987). Space as an order of situations. In Abstracts, LMPS’87 (Vol. 2, pp. 21–23). Moscow: Institute of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR.

  • Arthur R. T. W.: On the unappreciated novelty of Leibniz’s spatial relationalism. In: Heinekamp, A. (Ed.) Leibniz: Tradition und Aktualität, pp. 26–33. Gottfried-Willhelm-Leibniz-Gesellschaft, Hanover (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthur R. T. W.: Space and relativity in Newton and Leibniz. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45, 219–240 (1994a)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arthur R. T. W.: Relations of time and space. In: Breger, H. (Ed.) Leibniz und Europa, pp. 9–16. Gottfried-Willhelm-Leibniz-Gesellschaft, Hanover (1994b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbour J.: The end of time: The next revolution in physics. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cottingham, J., Stoothof, R., Murdoch, D. (eds): The philosophical writings of Descartes . Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  • De Risi V.: Geometry and monadology: Leibniz’s analysis situs and philosophy of space. Birkhäuser, Basel/Boston/ Berlin (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Descartes, R. (1644). Principia Philosophiae. Amsterdam: Elzevir. Transl in Cottingham et al., 1985.

  • Hartz G. A., Cover J. A.: Space and time in the Leibnizian metaphysic. Nous 22, 493–519 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobbes, T. (1668) Leviathan. Ed. Edwin Curley. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1994.

  • Hobbes, T. (1839a). English works. Ed. Sir William Molesworth. London: J. Bohn; reprint ed. Darmstadt: Scientia Verlag Aalen, 1966.

  • Hobbes, T. (1839b). Opera Philosophica. Ed. Sir William Molesworth. London: J. Bohn; reprint ed. Darmstadt: Scientia Verlag Aalen, 1966.

  • Huggett, N. (Ed.): Space from Zeno to Einstein. Bradford Books, Cambridge, MA/London (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibniz, G. W. (1923–). Sämtliche Schriften und Briefe. Ed. Akademie der Wissenschaften der DDR. Darmstadt and Berlin: Akademie-Verlag; cited by series, volume and page.

  • Leibniz, G. W. (1966). Opuscules et fragments inédits de Leibniz. Ed. Louis Couturat. Paris: Alcan, 1903; reprint ed. Hildesheim: Olms.

  • Leibniz, G. W. (1969). Philosophical papers and letters, 2nd ed (Louis Loemker, Ed., Trans.). Dordrecht: D. Reidel.

  • Leibniz, G. W. (1971). Leibnizens Mathematische Schriften. Ed. C. I. Gerhardt. Berlin and Halle: Asher and Schmidt, 1849–1863; reprint ed. Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 7 vols; cited by volume and page.

  • Leibniz, G. W. (1978). Der Philosophische Schriften von Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz. Ed. C. I. Gerhardt. Berlin: Weidmann, 1875–1890; reprint ed. Hildesheim/New York: Georg Olms, 7 vols; cited by volume and page.

  • Leibniz, G. W. (1981). New essays on human understanding (P. Remnant, & J. Bennett, Eds., Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Leibniz, G. W. (1992). De Summa Rerum: Metaphysical Papers 1675–1676. Translated with an introduction by G. H. R. Parkinson. New Haven: Yale University Press.

  • Leibniz, G. W. (1995a). La charactéristique géométrique. Ed. Echeverría, Javier, transl. Parmentier, Marc with annotations, introduction and postface. Paris: J. Vrin.

  • Leibniz, G. W. (1995b). Philosophical writings. (G. H. R. Parkinson, Ed., M. Morris, & G. H. R. Parkinson, Trans.). London: J. M. Dent (Rutland, VT: Charles Tuttle, 1995).

  • Leibniz, G. W. (1998). Philosophical texts (R. S. Woolhouse, R. Francks, Eds., Trans.). Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Leibniz, G. W. (2001). The Labyrinth of the continuum: Writings of 1672 to 1686. Selected, edited and translated, with an introductory essay, by R. T. W. Arthur. New Haven: Yale University Press.

  • Mugnai, M. (1992). Leibniz’ theory of relations. Studia Leibnitiana Supplementa XXVIII. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.

  • Newton, I. (1988). Newton: Philosophical writings, ed. Andrew Janiak. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Russel, B. (1900). A critical exposition of the philosophy of leibniz. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (2nd ed. 1937, reprinted London, Routledge, 1992).

  • Smolin L.: The life of the cosmos. Oxford University Press, New York/Oxford (1997)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard T. W. Arthur.

Additional information

This essay draws on earlier published work, including the introductory essay in my (Leibniz 2001), as well as several papers based on joint work with Graham Solomon, including my (Arthur 1987, 1988). Graham’s tragic early death prevented any further collaboration between us. I publish this in his memory. I am deeply indebted to Ed Slowik for his detailed comments and suggestions on an earlier draft, and also to Steve Savitt for his comments on the penultimate one. All translations of Leibniz’s Latin or French are my own, except where noted, and many of them from Leibniz (2001). I have used the notation ‘ôr’ for the ‘or’ that translates seu or sive, the ‘or of equivalence’, to distinguish it from disjunction or alternation. It has the sense of “that is to say”.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Arthur, R.T.W. Leibniz’s Theory of Space. Found Sci 18, 499–528 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-011-9281-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-011-9281-4

Keywords

Navigation