Abstract
The empirical turn in bioethics has been widely discussed by philosophical medical ethicists and social scientists. The focus of this discussion has been almost exclusively on methodological issues in research, on the admissibility of empirical evidence in rational argument, and on the possible superiority of empirical methods for permitting democratic lay involvement in decision-making. In this paper I consider how the collection of qualitative and quantitative social research evidence plays its part in the construction of social order, and how this creates certain paradoxes for the normative ideal of a public bioethics. The analysis in this paper is based on Foucauldian ideas, and on recent work in the history of the human sciences. The paper closes with some open questions for theoretical work in the sociology and philosophy of bioethics.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Adorno, T.W. (1973) The Jargon of Authenticity. Evanstan, IL: Northwestern University Press.
Adorno, T.W. (2000) Problems of Moral Philosophy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Akrich, M., Latour, B. (1992) A Summary of a Convenient Vocabulary for the Semiotics of Human and Nonhuman Assemblies. In W. E. Bijker and J. Law (Eds.) Shaping Technology/Building Society (pp. 259-264). Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.
Althusser, L. (1996) For Marx. London: Verso.
Ashcroft, R.E. (1995) The Genealogy of Scientific Ethics. University of Cambridge, Cambridge, unpublished PhD thesis.
Ashcroft, R.E. (1999) Teaching for Patient Centred Ethics. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 3, 287-295.
Baker, K.M. (1975) Condorcet: From Natural Philosophy to Social Mathematics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bauer, M.W., Gaskell, G. (Eds.) (2002) Biotechnology: The Making of a Global Controversy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Beck, U. (1992) Risk Society. London: SAGE.
Bennett, R., Cribb, A. (2001) The Relevance of Empirical Research to Bioethics: Reviewing the Debate. Manchester: EMPIRE project working paper.
Bernstein, J.M. (2001) Adorno. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bourdieu, P., Wacquant, L.J.D. (1996) An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Brooks, D. (2001) BoBos in Paradise. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Deleuze, G. (1988) Foucault. London: Athlone Press.
Derrida, J. (1981) Writing and Difference. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Durkheim, E. (2001) The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Foucault, M. (1974) The Archaeology of Knowledge. London: Routledge.
Foucault, M. (1979) The History of Sexuality. London: Penguin.
Foucault, M. (1980) Power/Knowledge. London: Routledge.
Foucault, M. (2000) Power: Essential Works of Foucault 1954–1984, volume 3. London: Penguin.
Giddens, A. (1984) The Constitution of Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Gigerenzer, G., et al. (1989) The Empire of Chance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Golinski, J. (1998) Making Natural Knowledge: Constructivism and the History of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hacking, I. (1990) The Taming of Chance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Haimes, E. (2002) What can the Social Sciences Contribute to the Study of Ethics? Theoretical, Empirical and Substantive Considerations. Bioethics 16, 89-113.
Hoffmaster, B. (1992) Can Ethnography Save the Life of Medical Ethics? Social Science and Medicine 35, 1421-1431.
Holm, S. (1997) Ethical Problems in Clinical Practice. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Hope, T. (1999) Empirical Medical Ethics. Journal of Medical Ethics 25, 219-220.
Kleinman, A. M., et al. (1999) Bioethics and Beyond Daedalus 128, no. 4 (special issue).
Kusch, M. (Ed.)(2000) The Sociology of Philosophical Knowledge. The Hague: Kluwer Academic.
Larmore, C. (1996) The Morals of Modernity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Latour, B. (1987) Science in Action. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
Lyotard, J.-F. (1984) The Postmodern Condition. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Lyotard, J.-F. (1988) The Differend Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Mulkay, M.J. (1985) The Word and the World. London: Harper Collins.
O'Neill, O. (2002) Autonomy and Trust in Bioethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pippin, R.B. (1999) Modernity as a Philosophical Problem. Oxford: Blackwell.
Porter, T. (1996) Trust in Numbers. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Priest, S. (1987) Hegel's Critique of Kant. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rabinow, P. (1996) Essays on the Anthropology of Reason. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Reuzel, R.P.B. (2001) Health Technology Assessment and Interactive Evaluation: Different Perspectives. Nijmegen: University of Nijmegen, unpublished PhD dissertation.
Rose, N. (1999) Powers of Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Searle, J. (1964) How to Derive ‘Ought’ From ‘Is’. Philosophical Review 73, 43-58.
Spallone, P., Wilkie, T. (2000) The Research Agenda in Pharmacogenetics and Biological Samples Collections-A View From the Wellcome Trust. New Genetics and Society 19, 193-205.
Touraine, A. (1984) Solidarity: The Analysis of a Social Movement, 1980–1981. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Woolgar, S. (Ed.)(1988) Knowledge and Reflexivity. London: SAGE.
York, P., Jennings, C. (1996) Peter York's The Eighties. London: BBC Books.
Zussman, R. (2000) The Contributions of Sociology to Medical Ethics. Hastings Center Report 30, no.1: 7-11.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ashcroft, R.E. Constructing Empirical Bioethics: Foucauldian Reflections on the Empirical Turn in Bioethics Research. Health Care Analysis 11, 3–13 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025329811812
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025329811812