Skip to main content
Log in

Semantic competence, linguistic understanding, and a theory of concepts

  • Published:
Philosophical Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Adams, E.: 1965, ‘The logic of conditionals’, Inquiry 8, pp. 166–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asher, N.: 1982, Truth Conditions and Semantic Competence: Toward a Theory of Linguistic Understanding, Ph.D. thesis, Yale University.

  • Asher, N.: 1984, ‘Linguistic understanding and the foundations of non-monotonic reasoning’, in Proceedings of the AAAI Workshop on Non-Monotonic Reasoning, New Paltz, NY.

  • Asher, N.: 1986, ‘Belief in discourse representation theory’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 15, pp. 127–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asher, N.: 1987, ‘A typology for attitude verbs and their anaphoric properties’, Linguistics and Philosophy 10, pp. 125–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bealer, G.: 1982, Quality and Concept, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bealer, G.: 1984, ‘Mind and anti-mind: Why thinking has no functional definition’, in P. French, T. Uehling & H. Wettstein, ed., Midwest Studies in Philosophy IX, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp. 283–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergmann, G.: 1959, Meaning and Existence, Wisconsin University Press, Madison, Wi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Church, A.: 1951, ‘A formulation of the logic of sense and denotation’, in P. Henle, H. Callen & S. Langer, ed., Structure, Method, and Meaning: Essays in Honor of Henry M. Sheffer, The Liberal Arts Press, New York, pp. 3–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cresswell, M. J.: 1978, ‘Semantic competence’, in F. Guenthner & M. Guenthner Reutter, ed., Meaning and Translation, Duckworth, London, pp. 9–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D.: 1982, ‘Beyond belief’, in Thought and Intentionality, A. Woodfield, ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 9–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowty, D.: 1979, Word Meaning and Montague Grammar, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dummett, M.: 1976, ‘What is a theory of meaning? (II)’, in G. Evans and J. McDowell, ed., Truth and Meaning, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 67–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Field, H.: 1977, ‘Logic, meaning and conceptual role’, Journal of Philosophy 74, pp. 379–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Field, H.: 1978, ‘Mental representation’, Erkenntnis 13, pp. 9–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J.: 1975, The Language of Thought, Thomas Y. Crowell Company, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J.: 1981, Representations, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacking, I.: 1967, ‘Slightly more realistic personal probability’, Philosophy of Science 34, pp. 311–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harman, G.: 1973, Thought, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornstein, N.: 1984, Logic as Grammar, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson-Laird, P.: 1983, Mental Models, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamp, H.: 1981, ‘A theory of truth and semantic representation’, in Formal Methods in the Study of Language, J. Groenendijk, Th. Janssen & M. Stokhof, ed., Mathematisch Centrum Tracts, Amsterdam, pp. 277–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamp, H.: 1983, ‘Situations in discourse without time or questions’, manuscript.

  • Kamp, H. and Rohrer, C.: 1981, ‘Tense in texts’, Proceedings of the 1981 Linguistics Conference at Konstanz, Germany.

  • Kripke, S.: 1979, ‘A puzzle about belief’, in A. Margalit, ed., Meaning and Use, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 239–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leblanc, H.: 1983, ‘Alternatives to standard first order semantics’, in D. Gabbay & F. Guenthner, ed., Handbook of Philosophical Logic, Volume I: Elements of Classical Logic, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 189–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D.: 1972, ‘General semantics’, in D. Davidson and G. Harman, ed., Semantics of Natural Language, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 169–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D.: 1981, ‘Probabilities of conditionals and conditional probabilities’, Philosophical Review 85, pp. 297–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mates, B.: 1952, ‘Synonymity’, in L. Linsky, ed., Semantics and the Philosophy of Language, University of Illinois Press, Urbana, pp. 111–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G.: 1963, ‘Reply to my critics’, in Readings in Twentieth Century Philosophy, W. Alston and G. Nakhnikian, ed., Free Press of Glencoe, New York, pp. 279–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, H.: 1975, The meaning of “meaning”, in Mind, Language and Reality: Philosophical Papers, Volume 2, H. Putnam, ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 215–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, H.: 1978, Meaning and the Moral Sciences, Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd., London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suppes, P.: 1968, ‘Rational changes of belief’, in I. Lakatos, ed., The Problem of Inductive Logic, North Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 186–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Eckardt, B.: 1984, ‘Cognitive psychology and principled skepticism’, Journal of Philosophy 81, pp. 67–89.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

I would like to thank Dan Bonevac and Hans Kamp for their comments on an earlier draft of this paper, and the Center for Cognitive Science and the AI Lab at the University of Taxax at Austin for their generous research support.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Asher, N. Semantic competence, linguistic understanding, and a theory of concepts. Philosophical Studies 53, 1–36 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00355674

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00355674

Keywords

Navigation