Abstract
Recently a growing number of biologists have begun to consider the causal role that processes of embryonic development may play in evolution. This constitutes a reunion of these phenomena which had been linked in the nineteenth century through Haeckel's ‘biogenetic law’. This reunion may result in a new subdiscipline of biology, if there is a set of unique concepts and methods which tie the various research approaches together. Such concepts as bauplan, canalization, and developmental constraint, may serve in such a capacity. The methods employed must combine comparative and experimental analyses, with special attention paid to the range of variation in developmental events within each taxon. These concepts and methods are also applicable to the problem of how development evolved, thus the ‘evolution of development’ may also be considered part of the reunion. The reunion is discussed in terms of the potential participation of various schools of thought found in the current literature.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alberch, P.: 1982, ‘Developmental Constraints in Evolutionary Processes’, in J. T. Bonner (ed.), Evolution and Development, Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 313–32.
Alberch, P.: 1987, ‘Evolution of a Developmental Process: Irreversibility and Redundancy in Amphibian Metamorphosis’, in R. Raff and E. Raff (eds.), Development as an Evolutionary Process, Alan R. Liss, New York, pp. 23–46.
Allen, G.: 1975, Life Sciences in the Twentieth Century, John Wiley, New York.
Bodnar, J. W.: 1988, ‘A Domain Model for Eukaryotic DNA Organization: A Molecular Basis for Cell Differentiation and Chromosome Evolution’, Journal of Theoretical Biology 132, 479–507.
Bonner, J.: 1965, The Molecular Biology of Development, Oxford University Press, New York.
Bonner, J. T. (ed.): 1982, Evolution and Development, Springer-Verlag, New York.
Brusca, G. J.: 1975, General Patterns of Invertebrate Development, Mad River Press, Eureka CA.
Burian, R. M.: 1986, ‘Lillie's Paradox — or Some Hazards of Cellular Geography’, unpublished.
Buss, L.: 1987, The Evolution of Individuality, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Cheverud, J. M.: 1984, ‘Quantitative Genetics and Developmental Constraints on Evolution by Selection’, Journal of Theoretical Biology 110, 155–71.
Cohen, J.: 1979, ‘Maternal Constraints on Development’, in D. R. Newth and M. Balls (eds.), Maternal Effects in Development, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 1–28.
Davidson, E.: 1986, Gene Activity in Early Development, Academic Press, New York.
Dragger, B. J., M. A. Harkey, M. Iwata and A. H. Whiteley: 1989, ‘The Expression of Embryonic Primary Mesenchyme Genes of the Sea Urchin, Strongylocentrotus purpuratus, in the Adult Skeletogenic Tissues of this and Other Species of Echinoderms’, Developmental Biology 133, 14–23.
Gilbert, S. F.: 1985, Developmental Biology, Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland MA.
Goodwin, B. C.: 1984, ‘A Relational or Field Theory of Reproduction and its Evolutionary Implications’, in M. Ho and P. Saunders (eds.), Beyond Neo-Darwinism, Academic Press, London, pp. 219–41.
Goodwin, B. C., N. Holder and C. C. Wylie (eds.): 1983, Development and Evolution, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Gould, S. J.: 1977, Ontogeny and Phylogeny, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.
Gould, S. J.: 1989a, ‘A Developmental Constraint in Cerion, with Comments on the Definition and Interpretation of Constraint in Evolution’, Evolution 43, 516–39.
Gould, S. J.: 1989b, Wonderful Life, W. W. Norton, New York.
Hall, B. K.: 1992, ‘Waddington's Legacy in Development and Evolution’, Amer. Zoologist, in press.
Hanken, J.: 1989, ‘Development and Evolution in Amphibians’, American Scientist 77, 336–43.
Ho, M.: 1984, ‘Environment and Heredity in Development and Evolution’, in M. Ho and P. T. Saunders (eds.), Beyond Neo-Darwinism, Academic Press, London, pp. 267–89.
Ho, M. and P. T. Saunders (eds.): 1984, Beyond Neo-Darwinism, Academic Press, London.
Hull, D. L.: 1988, Science as a Process, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Katz, M. J.: 1987, ‘Is Evolution Random?’, in R. Raff and E. Raff (eds.), Development as an Evolutionary Process, Alan R. Liss, New York, pp. 285–315.
Kauffman, S.: 1983, ‘Developmental Constraints: Internal Factors in Evolution’, in B. Goodwin, N. Holder and C. C. Wylie (eds.), Development and Evolution, Cambridge University Press, London, pp. 195–225.
Lande, R.: 1986, ‘The Dynamics of Peak Shifts and the Pattern of Morphological Evolution’, Paleobiology 12, 343–54.
Levinton, J. S.: 1985, ‘Developmental Constraints and Evolutionary Saltations: A Discussion and Critique’, in J. P. Gustafson and F. J. Ayala (eds.), Development and Evolution, University of Missouri Press, Columbia MO, pp. 253–87.
Lovtrup, S.: 1984, ‘Ontogeny and Phylogeny’, in M. Ho and P. T. Saunders (eds.), Beyond Neo-Darwinism, Academic Press, London.
Lovtrup, S.: 1987 Darwinism: The Refutation of a Myth, Croom Helm, New York.
Maienschein, J.: 1987, ‘Heredity/Development in the United States, circa 1900’, History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 9, 79–93.
Maynard Smith, J., R. Burian, S. Kaufman, P. Alberch, J. Campbell, B. Goodwin, R. Lande, D. Raup and L. Wolpert: 1985, ‘Developmental Constraits and Evolution’, Quarterly Review of Biology 60, 264–87.
Mayr, E.: 1982, The Growth of Biological Thought, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.
Muller, G. B. and J. Streicher: 1989, ‘Ontogeny of the Syndesmosis Tibiofibularis and the Evolution of the Bird Hindlimb: A Caenogenetic Feature Triggers Phenotypic Novelty’, Anatomy and Embryology 179, 327–39.
Nordenskiold, E.: 1928, The History of Biology, trans. L. B. Eyre, Tudor Publ. Co., New York.
Pollard, J. W.: 1984, ‘Is Weismann's Barrier Absolute?’, in M. Ho and P. T. Saunders (eds.), Beyond Neo-Darwinism, Academic Press, London, pp. 291–314.
Raff, R. A. and T. C. Kauffman: 1983, Embryos, Genes, and Evolution, Macmillan, New York.
Raff, R. A. and E. C. Raff (eds.): 1987, Development as an Evolutionary Process, Alan R. Liss, Inc., New York.
Reid, R. R. G.: 1985, Evolutionary Theory: The Unfinished Synthesis, Cornell University Press, Ithaca NY.
Rosen, D. E. and D. G. Bluth: 1980, ‘Empirical Evolutionary Research Versus Neo-Darwinian Speculation’, Systematic Zoology 29, 300–08.
Saunders, P. T.: 1984, ‘Development and Evolution’, in M. Ho and P. T. Saunders (eds.), Beyond Neo-Darwinism, Academic Press, London, pp. 243–63.
Saunders, S. R.: 1985, ‘The Inheritance of Acquired Characters: A Concept that will not Die’, in L. R. Godfrey (ed.), What Darwin Began, Allyn and Bacon, Boston, pp. 148–61.
Seeger, M. A. and T. C. Kauffman: 1987, ‘Homoeotic Genes of the Antennapedia Complex [ant-c] and their Molecular Variability in the Phylogeny of the Drosophilididae’, in R. Raff and E. C. Raff (eds.), Development as an Evolutionary Process, Alan R. Liss, New York, pp. 179–202.
Smallwood, P. D.: 1988, ‘The Use and Disuse of Genetic Assimilations’, unpublished.
Stebbins, G. L. and D. L. Hartl: 1988, ‘Comparative Evolution: Latent Potentials for Anagenetic Advance’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 85, 5141–45.
Temin, H. M.: 1971, ‘The Protovirus Hypothesis: Speculations on the Significance of RNA-Directed DNA Synthesis for Normal Development and for Carcinogenesis’, Journal of the U.S. National Cancer Institute 46, III-VII.
Thomson, K. S.: 1988, Morphogenesis and Evolution, Oxford University Press, New York.
Waddington, C. H.: 1975, The Evolution of an Evolutionist, Cornell University Press, Ithaca NY.
Wimsatt, W. C.: 1987, ‘Parallels between Evolution and Scientific Change’, unpublished (presented at meeting on the History, Philosophy and Social Studies of Biology, at Blacksburg VA).
Wray, G. A. and D. R. McClay: 1989, ‘Molecular Heterochronies and Heterotopies in Early Echinoid Development’, Evolution 43, 803–13.
Yoxen, E.: 1985, ‘Form and Strategy in Biology: Reflections on the Career of C. H. Waddington’, in T. J. Horder, J. A. Witkowski and C. C. Wylie (eds.), A History of Embryology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 309–29.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This work was supported by the NEH and undertaken as part of an NEH summer seminar entitled ‘Philosophy of Biology in a Cultural Context’, which was directed by Richard Burian and Marjorie Grene in the summer of 1989 at Blacksburg, Virginia. The author wishes to thank Professors Burian and Grene and all the participants of the seminar for the tremendous intellectual stimulus afforded by that summer experience. Conversations with K. Elizabeth Atkinson, M. Balaban, and M. Zelditch have also contributed greatly in the preparation of this paper. Whatever shortcomings may exist within it are, of course, my responsibility.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Atkinson, J.W. Conceptual issues in the reunion of development and evolution. Synthese 91, 93–110 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00484971
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00484971