Abstract
In very general terms, perception is a response to the world. The paradigm cases of it are responses by the five senses: we see, hear, touch, taste, taste, and smell. But we also have an awareness of states of our own body, such as the position and movement of our limbs, and that awareness is at once similar in character to perception yet not dependent on the five senses. There is a third kind of awareness, one that is distinct, at least conceptually, from our awareness of our bodily condition and movements; its object is our own mental states. The first — ordinary perception — has been called exteroception (“outer perception”), the second interoception (“inner perception”) or, in a special case, proprioception, though taking this term generically in the sense of ‘self-perception’ we might conveniently use it to designate the third case, in which the object of awareness is mental. All three are important for this study, particularly the first and third. Under the more general rubrics of perception and introspection (or self-consciousness), these are perennially basic topics in epistemology, construed as the theory of knowledge and justification.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Alston, W.: 1963, `Back to the Theory of Appearing’, Philosophical Perspectives 13 (1999), 181–203, Cf. R. M. Chisholm, in M. Black, (ed.), Philosophical Analysis, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Alston, W.: 1991, Perceiving God, Cornell University Press, Ithaca and London.
Armstrong, D. M.: 1961, Perception and the Physical World, Penguin Books, London.
Armstrong, D. M.: 1968, A Materialist Theory of the Mind, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
Armstrong, D. M.: 1973, Belief Truth and Knowledge, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Audi, R.: 1978, `The Ontological Status of Mental Images’, Inquiry 21, 348–61.
Audi, R.(ed.): 1993, The Structure of Justification, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York.
Audi, R.: 1993, `The Foundationalism Coherentism Controversy: Hardened Stereotypes and Overlapping Theories’, in Audi, The Structure of Justification.
Audi, R.: 1994, `Dispositional Beliefs and Dispositions to Believe,’ Nous 28, 419–34.
Audi, R.: 1997, Moral Knowledge and Ethical Character, Oxford University Press, New York.
Audi, R.: 1997, `Intuitionism, Pluralism and the Foundations of Ethics’, in Audi, Moral Knowledge and Ethical Character.
Audi, R.:1998, Epistemology, Routledge, London and New York.
Barnes, W. H. F.: 1944–45, `The Myth of Sense Data’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 45.
Bonjour, L.: 1997, In Defence of Pure Reason, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York.
Chisholm, R. M.: 1948, `The Problem of Empirism’, Journal of Philosophy 45.
Chisholm, R. M.: 1957, Perceiving, Cornell University Press, Ithaca.
Dretske, F.: 1969, Seeing and Knowing, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Dretske, F.: 1981, Knowledge and the Flow of Information, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Firth, R.: 1978, `Are Epistemic Concepts Reducible to Ethical Concepts?’, in A. Goldman and J. Kim (eds.): Values and Morals, pp. 215–29, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.
Gibson J.: 1950, The Perception of the Visual World, Houghton Mifflin, Boston.
Grice, H. P.: 1961, `The Causal Theory of Perception’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume 35.
Hannay, A.: 1971, Mental Images: A Defence, George Allen and Unwin, London.
Heil, J.: 1983, Perception and Cognition, University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles.
Heil, J and Mele A. (eds.): 1993, Mental Causation, Oxford University Press, Oxford and New York.
Helmholtz, H., von: 1867, Treatise on Physiological Optics, transl. by J.P.C. Southall, Dover Publications 1962, New York.
Hume, D.: An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, in E. Steinberg (ed.) 1977, Hackett, Indianapolis.
Hume D. 1739–40: A Treatise of Human Nature, L.A. Selby-Bigge (ed.) 1888, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Lewis C. I.: 1946, An Analysis of Knowledge and Valuation, Open Court, La Salle, Illinois.
Locke, J.: 1689, An Essay Concerning Human Understanding.
McLaughlin, B.P. and A.O. Rorty: 1988, Perspectives on Self-Deception, University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles.
Marr, D.: 1980, `Representing and Computing Visual Information’, in H.C. Longuet-Higgins and N.S. Sutherland (eds.), The Psychology of Vision, London.
Quine, W. V.: 1992, Pursuit of Truth, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
Robinson, H.: 1994, Perception, Routledge, London and New York.
Rock, I. (ed.): 1997, Indirect Perception, MIT Press, Cambridge MA.
Smart, J. J. C.: 1959, `Sensations and Brain Processes’, Philosophical Review 68, 141–56.
Wittgenstein, L.: 1953, Philosophical Investigations, Blackwell, Oxford.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Audi, R. (2004). Perception and Consciousness. In: Niiniluoto, I., Sintonen, M., Woleński, J. (eds) Handbook of Epistemology. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-1986-9_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-1986-9_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-015-6969-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-1986-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive