Skip to main content
Log in

Kinds of behaviour

  • Published:
Biology & Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sciences able to identify appropriate analytical units for their domain, their natural kinds, have tended to be more progressive. In the biological sciences, evolutionary natural kinds are adaptations that can be identified by their common history of selection for some function. Human brains are the product of an evolutionary history of selection for component systems which produced behaviours that gave adaptive advantage to their hosts. These structures, behaviour production systems, are the natural kinds that psychology seeks. We argue these can be identified deductively by classing behaviour first according to its level of behavioural control. Early animals in our lineage used only reactive production, Vertebrates evolved motivation, and later Primates developed executive control. Behaviour can also be classified by the type of evolutionary benefit it bestows: it can deliver either immediate benefits (food, gametes), improvements in the individual’s position with respect to the world (resource access, social status), or improvements in the ability to secure future benefits (knowledge, skill). Combining history and function implies the existence of seven types of behaviour production systems in human brains responsible for reflexive, instinctual, exploratory, driven, emotional, playful and planned behaviour. Discovering scientifically valid categories of behaviour can provide a fundamental taxonomy and common language for understanding, predicting and changing behaviour, and a way of discovering the organs in the brain––its natural kinds––that are responsible for behaviour.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Movement can be of the whole body, of body parts (e.g., swimming, tail-flicking, flint-knapping), or ejections of matter or energy into the environment from inside the body (e.g., defecation, speech). Behaviour must be self-powered (i.e., locomotory) rather than dependant on external forces (e.g., drifting in a current of water or air). We do not count physiological movements such as heart-beats or peristalsis as behaviour because they do not interact with the environment. Such internal movements are also controlled by the autonomous nervous system rather than the central nervous system, and so are independently regulated.

  2. The behaviour production unit lets animals turn salient external and internal stimuli into adaptive outputs or behaviour. We have thus set aside input side topics such as sensation, perception, categorization and concept discrimination. We similarly also avoid issues such as selection among competing behavioural options and motor control on the output side. Finally, we have set aside, at least for the moment, some of the special complexities of human behaviour––difficult issues such as temperament, mood, expression, and the role of culture. For the most part, these either modulate processes we do discuss or are late additions to behaviour production units.

  3. Since behaviour does not fossilise, we cannot reconstruct the behavioural abilities of our ancestors directly; we can only make inferences based on extant animals that may, or may not, be representative of the behavioural capabilities at a certain point in our evolutionary past, given that contemporary species have had many millions of years (in some cases) to evolve new abilities. Our argument regarding the timing of new types of production systems is based not on the most advanced contemporary exemplar in some clade, but rather on the inferred qualities of a prototypical ancestral species in that group.

  4. Just about any behaviour is likely to be accompanied by learning. The knowledge acquired in this way can modify the way in which a particular BPU works in future. However, this does not make all behaviour aptitudinal in our sense because the primary function of those behaviours is to achieve other kinds of end-states, rather than being devoted to learning per se.

  5. Experimental psychologists nowadays avoid use of the word ‘drive’, largely because a number of results have been interpreted as refuting Hull’s classic drive reduction theory (Hull 1943). However, in each case, these experimental results can be interpreted as ‘tricking’ the reward system in a way which natural selection cannot be expected to have foreseen. First, rats will work to obtain saccharine rewards even when not calorie deficient (i.e., not in a state of ‘hunger’) (Sheffield and Roby 1950). However, saccharine constitutes an artificial, non-nutritive source of sweet taste, which is a proximal cue of ripe fruit in an animal’s evolved niche. Second, hungry rats will work to obtain direct electrical stimulation of their mesotelencephalic dopamine system, even over the option to receive food (Olds and Milner 1954; Routtenberg and Lindy 1965). This surgical procedure short-circuits the evolved reward system; selection is unlikely to predict a technology which provides rewards in the absence of the requisite biological resources following behaviour. Showing that maladaptive outcomes can be obtained through such artificial procedures does not refute the validity of the general claim that drives have evolved to produce need-directed behaviour which improves an animal’s fitness, and that such behaviour tends to appropriately manage internal resource levels under ‘natural’ ecological conditions.

References

  • Adolphs R (2001) The neurobiology of social cognition. Curr Opin Neurobiol 11:231–239

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen C, Bekoff M (1997) Species of mind: the philosophy and biology of cognitive ethology. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Allman JM (1999) Evolving brains. Scientific American Library, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Amabile TM (1996) Creativity in context. Westview Press, Boulder, Co

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold MB (1960) Emotion and personality. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin JT, Vancouver JB (1996) Goal constructs in psychology: structure, process, and content. Psychol Bull 120:338–375

    Google Scholar 

  • Averill JR (1980) A constructionist view of emotion. In: Plutchik R, Kellerman H (eds) Emotion: theory, research, and experience. Academic Press, New York, pp 305–339

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura A (1986) Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Bargh JA, Chartrand TL (1999) The unbearable automaticity of being. Am Psychol 54:462–479

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker RG, Wright HF (1954) Midwest and its children: the psychological ecology of an American town. Row, Peterson and Company, Evanston

    Google Scholar 

  • Barlow HB (1994) What is the computational goal of the neocortex? In: Koch C, Davis JL (eds) Large-scale neuronal theories of the brain. MIT Press, Boston, MA, pp 1–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett LF (2006) Emotions as natural kinds? Perspectives on psychological Science 1:28–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Berridge KC (2004) Motivation concepts in behavioral neuroscience. Physiol Behav 81:179–209

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohr N (1913) On the constitution of atoms and molecules. Philos Mag 26:1–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolker JA (2000) Modularity in development and why it matters to evo-devo. Am Zool 40:770–776

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd RN (1991) Realism, anti-foundationalism and the enthusiasm for natural kinds. Philos Stud 61:127–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd RN (1999a) Kinds, complexity and multiple realization. Philos Stud 95:67–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd RN (1999b) Homeostasis, species, and higher taxa. In: Wilson RA (ed) Species: new interdisciplinary essays. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 141–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Brosnan S, Earley R, Dugatkin LA (2003) Observational learning and predator inspection in guppies. Ethology 109:823–833

    Google Scholar 

  • Burghardt GM (2005) The genesis of animal play. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler AB, Hodos W (2005) Comparative vertebrate neuroanatomy: evolution and adaptation, 2nd edn. Wiley-Liss, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Camerer C, Loewenstein G, Prelec D (2005) Neuroeconomics: how neuroscience can inform economics. J Econ Lit 43:9–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Catton C, Wilson C, Dalton R, Shotton DM (2003) SABO: a standard. Anim Behav Ontol (alpha version 0.1) vol. 2006

  • Charland LC (2002) The natural kind status of emotion. Br J Philos Sci 53:511–537

    Google Scholar 

  • Christoff K, Gabrieli JDE (2000) The Frontopolar cortex and human cognition: evidence for a rostrocaudal hierarchical organization within the human prefrontal cortex. Psychobiology 28:168–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchland P, Sejnowski TJ (1992) The computational brain. MIT Press, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark A, Karmiloff-Smith A (1993) The Cognizer’s innards: a psychological and philosophical perspective on the development of thought. Mind Lang 8:487–519

    Google Scholar 

  • Clore G (1994) Why emotions are felt. In: Ekman P, Davidson RJ (eds) The nature of emotion: fundamental questions. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 103–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Coates M, Jeffrey J, Ruta M (2002) Fins to limbs: what the fossils say. Evol Dev 4:390–401

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper R (2004) Why Hacking is wrong about human kinds. Br J Philos Sci 55:73–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosmides L, Tooby J (2000) Consider the source: the evolution of adaptations for decoupling and metarepresentation. In: Sperber D (ed) Metarepresentation: a multidisciplinary perspective. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtis V, Aunger R, Rabie T (2004) Evidence that disgust evolved to protect from risk of disease. Proc: Biological Sci (Biology Letters) 277:131–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtis V, Biran A (2001) Dirt, disgust and disease. Perspect Biol Med 44:17–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Cziko G (1995) Without miracles: universal selection theory and the second Darwinian revolution. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Damasio AR (1994) Descartes’ error: emotion, reason, and the human brain. G. P. Putnam’s Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Damasio AR (2003) Looking for spinoza. Harcourt, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins R (1976) Hierarchical organisation: a candidate principle for ethology. In: Bateson P, Hinde R (eds) Growing points in ethology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 7–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Dayan P, Abbott LF (2001) Theoretical Neuroscience: computational and mathematical modeling of neural systems. MIT Press, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Deci EL (1971) Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation. J Pers Soc Psychol 18:105–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Deci EL (1975) Intrinsic motivation. Plenum Publishing Co., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Deci EL, Ryan RM (1985a) Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Plenum, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Deci EL, Ryan RM (1985b) Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Plenum Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Delancey C (2002) Passionate engines: what emotions reveal about mind and artificial intelligence. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett D (1996) Kinds of minds: toward an understanding of consciousness. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dienes Z, Perner J (1999) A theory of implicit and explicit knowledge. Behav Brain Sci 22:735–808

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolan RJ (2002) Emotion,cognition,and behavior. Science 298:1191–1194

    Google Scholar 

  • Druce MR, Small CJ, Bloom SR (2005) Minireview: gut peptides regulating satiety. Endocrinology 145:2660–2665

    Google Scholar 

  • Dupré JA (2000) Natural kinds. In: Newton-Smith WH (ed) A companion to the philosophy of science. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 311–319

    Google Scholar 

  • Editors (2006) The American heritage dictionary of the english language, 4th edn. Houghton Mifflin, New York

  • Ekman P (1999) Basic emotion. In: Dalgleish T, Power M (eds) Handbook of cognition and emotion. Wiley, Sussex, UK, pp 45–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans D (2002) The search hypothesis of emotion. Br J Philos Sci 53:497–509

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagen R (1991) Animal play behavior. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernald RD (1997) The evolution of eyes. Brain behav Evol 50:253–259

    Google Scholar 

  • Fincham JM, Carter CS, van Veen V, Stenger VA, Anderson JR (2002) Neural mechanisms of planning: a computational analysis using event-related fMRI. Proc Natl Acad Sci 99:3346–3351

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein M, Ajzen I (1975) Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Addison–Wesley, Reading, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Franken R (2001) Human motivation, 5th edn. Brooks/Cole, Pacific Grove, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederich S, Lowenstein G, O’Donoghue T (2002) Time discounting and time preference: a critical review. J Econ Lit 40:351–401

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman WJ (1999) How the brain makes up its mind. Weidenfeld and Nicholson, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman WJ (2000) Emotion is essential to all intentional behaviors. In: Lewis MD, Granic I (eds) Emotion, development, and self-organization: dynamic systems approaches to emotional development. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 209–235

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuster J (2003) Cortex and mind: unifying cognition. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamow G (1954) Possible relation between deoxyribonucleic acid and protein structures. Nature 173:318

    Google Scholar 

  • Geary DC, Huffman KJ (2002) Brain and cognitive evolution: forms of modularity and functions of mind. Psychol Bull 128:667–698

    Google Scholar 

  • Gehring WJ, Ikeo K (1999) Pax 6: mastering eye morphogenesis and eye evolution. Trends Genet 15:371–377

    Google Scholar 

  • Gershenson C (2001) Artificial societies of intelligent agents. Ms Thesis thesis, Fundación Arturo Rosenblueth México

  • Ghiselin MT (1974) A radical solution to the species problem. Syst Zool 23:536–544

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs J, Maddison SP, Rolls ET (1981) The satiety role of the small intestine in sham feeding rhesus monkeys. J Comp Physiol Psychol 95:1003–1015

    Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey-Smith P (1996) Complexity and the function of mind in nature. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Golani I (1976) Homeostatic motor processes in mammalian interactions: a choreography of display. In: Bateson PPG, Klopfer PH (eds) Perspectives in ethology, vol 2. Plenum, New York, pp 69–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray JR, Braver TS, Raichle ME (2002) Integration of emotion and cognition in the lateral prefrontal cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:4115–4120

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths P (1997) What emotions really are: the problem of psychological categories. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths PE (1999) Squaring the circle: natural kinds with historical essences. In: Wilson RA (ed) Species: new interdisciplinary essays. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 209–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths PE (2004a) Is emotion a natural kind? In: Solomon RC (ed) Thinking about feeling: contemporary philosophers on emotions. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 233–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths PE (2004b) Emotions as natural and normative kinds. Philos Sci 71:901–911

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacking I (2002) Making up people. In: Hacking I (ed) Historical ontology. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 99–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardcastle VG (1995) Locating consciousness. John Benjamins, Amsterdam & Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Harnish R (2001) Minds, brains, computers: an historical introduction to the foundations of cognitive science. Blackwell, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartwell LH, Hopfield JJ, Leibler S, Murray AW (1999) From molecular to modular cell biology. Nature 402:C47–C52

    Google Scholar 

  • Haslam N (1998) Natural kinds, human kinds, and essentialism. Soc Res 65:291–314

    Google Scholar 

  • Haslam N (2002) Natural kinds, practical kinds and psychiatric categories: review of Zachar on biological-psychiatry. Psycoloquy 13, Biol Psychiatry 2 psycprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/archive/00000193/

  • Hawkins J, Blakeslee S (2004) On intelligence. Henry Holt, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hebb DO (1949) The organization of behavior. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennig W (1966) Phylogenetic systematics. University of Illinois Press, Urbana

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughlings Jackson J (1958) Selected writings of John Hughlings Jackson, vol 1 and 2. Staples Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull CL (1943) Principles of behavior: an introduction to behavior theory. Appleton-Century Co., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull D (1978) A matter of individuality. Philos Sci 45:335–360

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson GE (1944) Limnological studies in Connecticut. VII. A critical examination of the supposed relationship between phytoplankton periodicity and chemical changes in lake waters. Ecology 26:3–26

    Google Scholar 

  • James W (1884) What is an emotion? Mind 19:188–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson-Laird PN (2006) How we reason. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Keele S, Ivry R, Mayr U, Hazeltine E, Heuer H (2003) The cognitive and neural architecture of sequence representation. Psychol Rev 110:316–339

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller RA, Boyd RN, Wheeler QD (2003) The illogical basis of phylogenetic nomenclature. Bot Rev 69:93–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley JL, Magurran AE (2003) Learned predator recognition and antipredator responses in fish. Fish Fish 4:216–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelso JAS (1995) Dynamic patterns: the self-organisation of brain and behavior. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirschner MW, Gerhart JC (2006) The plausibility of life. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Koechlin E, Ody C, Kouneiher F (2003) The architecture of cognitive control in the human prefrontal cortex. Science 302:1181–1185

    Google Scholar 

  • Kornblith H (2002) Knowledge and its place in nature. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Kripke SA (1972) Naming and necessity. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • LaPorte J (2004) Natural kinds and conceptual change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus R (1991) Emotion and adaptation. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • LeDoux JE (2000) Emotion circuits in the brain. Ann Rev Neurosci 23:155–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Lepper MR, Greene D, Nisbett RE (1973) Undermining children’s intrinsic interest with extrinsic rewards: a test of the ‘overjustification’ hypothesis. J Pers Soc Psychol 28:129–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Lepper MR, Henderlong J (2000) Turning ‘play’ into ‘work’ and ‘work’ into ‘play’: 25 years of research on intrinsic versus extrinsic motivation. In: Sansone C, Harackiewicz JM (eds) Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: the search for optimal motivation and performance. Academic, San Diego, CA, pp 257–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Levenson RW (1999) The intrapersonal functions of emotion. Cogn Emot 13:481–504

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz K (1950) The comparative method in studying innate behaviour patterns. In: Danielli JF, Brown R (eds) Physiological mechanisms in animal behaviour. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz K (1965) Evolution and the modification of behavior. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Machery E (2005) Concepts are not a natural kind. Philos Sci 72:444–467

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallon R (2003) Social construction, social roles, and stability. In: Schmitt F (ed) Socializing metaphysics. Rowman and Littlefield, New York, pp 327–353

    Google Scholar 

  • Maslow AH (1943) A theory of human motivation. Psychol Rev 50:370–396

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr E (1963) Animal species and evolution. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • McClure SM, Ericson KM, Laibson DI, Loewenstein G, Cohen JD (2007) Time discounting for primary rewards. J Neurosci 27:5796–5804

    Google Scholar 

  • McClure SM, Laibson DI, Loewenstein G, Cohen JD (2004) Separate neural systems value immediate and delayed monetary rewards. Science 306:503–507

    Google Scholar 

  • Mesulam M-M (1998) From sensation to cognition. Brain 121:1013–1052

    Google Scholar 

  • Michaud F (2002) EMIB – Computational architecture based on emotion and motivation for intentional selection and configuration of behaviour-producing modules. Cogn Sci Q 3–4:340–361

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller EK, Cohen JD (2001) An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Ann Rev Neurosci 24:167–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller EK, Freedman DJ, Wallis JD (2002) The prefrontal cortex: categories, concepts, and cognition. Philos Trans: Biol Sci 357:1123–1136

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller GA, Galanter EH, Pribram KH (1960) Plans and the structure of behaviour. Holt Rinehart and Winston, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Millikan RG (1984) Language, thought and other biological categories. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Millikan RG (1989) In defense of proper functions. Philos Sci 56:288–302

    Google Scholar 

  • Millikan RG (1999) Historical kinds and the “special sciences”. Philos Stud 95:45–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Millikan RG (2000) On clear and confused ideas: an essay about substance concepts. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Millikan RG (in press) Thoughts of real kinds. In: Prinz J (ed) The Oxford handbook of philosophy of psychology. Oxford University Press, Oxford

  • Mountcastle V (1957) Modality and topographic properties of single neurons of cat’s somatic sensory cortex. J Neurophysiol 20:408–434

    Google Scholar 

  • Mountcastle VB (1998) Perceptual neuroscience: the cerebral cortex. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray HA (1938) Explorations in personality. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers DG (2006) Psychology, 8th edn. Worth, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Nesse RM (1990) Evolutionary explanations of emotion. Hum Nat 1:261–289

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell A (1990) Unified theories of cognition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Northcutt RG (2002) Understanding vertebrate brain evolution. Integr Comp Biol 42:743–756

    Google Scholar 

  • Northcutt RG, Kaas JH (1995) The emergence and evolution of mammalian neocortex. Trends Neurosci 18:373–379

    Google Scholar 

  • Oatley KJ (1993) Social construction in emotion. In: Lewis M, Haviland J (eds) Handbook of emotions. Guilford Press, New York, pp 342–352

    Google Scholar 

  • Ochsner KN, Gross JJ (2005) The cognitive control of emotion. Trends Cogn Sci 9(5):242–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Odling-Smee FJ, Laland KN, Feldman M (2003) Niche construction: the neglected process in evolution. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Olds J, Milner PM (1954) Positive reinforcement produced by electrical stimulation of the septal area and other regions of the rat brain. J Comp Physiol Psychol 47:419–427

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortony A, Norman DA, Revelle W (2004) Affect and proto-affect in effective functioning. In: Fellous JM, Arbib MA (eds) Who needs emotions? The brain meets the robot. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 173–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Panksepp J (1998) Affective neuroscience: the foundations of human and animal emotions. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Perner J (1991) Understanding the representational mind. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner MI, DiGirolamo GJ, Fernandez-Duque D (1997) Brain mechanisms of cognitive skills. Conscious Cogn 6:267–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Prinz J (2004) Gut reactions: a perceptual theory of emotion. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Proust J (2005) Rationality and metacognition in non-human animals. In: Hurley S, Nudds M (eds) Rational animals? Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 247–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam H (1975) The meaning of ‘Meaning. In: Putnam H (ed) Mind, language, and reality. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 215–271

    Google Scholar 

  • Pylyshyn ZW (1984) Computation and cognition: toward a foundation for cognitive science. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Quartz S (2001) Toward a developmental evolutionary psychology: Genes, development, and the evolution of human cognitive architecture. In: Scher S, Rauscher M (eds) Evolutionary psychology: alternative approaches. Kluwer

  • Quine WV (1969) Natural kinds. In: Rescher N (ed) Essays in honor of Carl. G. Hempel. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp 5–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Raby C, Alexis D, Dickinson A, Clayton N (2007) Planning for the future by western scrub-jays. Nature 445:919–921

    Google Scholar 

  • Raff RA (1996) The shape of life. Chicago University Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Reber A (1996) Implicit learning and tacit knowledge: an essay on the cognitive unconscious. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieppel O (2005a) Modules, kinds, and homology. J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol 304:18–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieppel O (2005b) Monophyly, paraphyly, and natural kinds. Biol Philos 20:465–487

    Google Scholar 

  • Rolls ET (1999) The brain and emotion. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Rolls ET (2005) Emotion explained. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Roseman IJ (1984) Cognitive determinants of emotion: a structural theory. In: Shaver P (ed) Review of personality and social psychology, vol 5. Sage, Beverly Hills, CA, pp 11–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal DM (2000) Consciousness and metacognition. In: Sperber D (ed) Metarepresentations: a multidisciplinary perspective. Basil Blackwell, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Routtenberg A, Lindy J (1965) Effects of the availability of rewarding septal and hypothalamic stimulation on bar pressing for food under conditions of deprivation. J Comp Physiol Psychol 60:158–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubenstein JL, Anderson S, Shi L, Miyashita LE, Bulfone A, Hevner R (1999) Genetic control of cotrtical regionalization and connectivity. Cereb Cortex 9:524–532

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan RM, Deci EL (2000) Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: classic definitions and new directions. Contemp Educ Psychol 25:54–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage LJ (1954) Foundations of statistics. Dover, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Schank R, Abelson R (1977) Scripts, plans goals and understanding: an inquiry into human knowledge structures. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer KR (1984) On the nature and function of emotion: a component process approach. In: Scherer KR, Ekman P (eds) Approaches to emotion. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 293–317

    Google Scholar 

  • Schleidt WM, Yakalis G, Donnelly M, McGarry J (1984) A proposal for a standard ethogram, exemplified by an ethogram of the bluebreasted quail (Coturnix chinensis). Zeitschreift für Tierpsychologie 64:193–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheffield FD, Roby TB (1950) Reward value of a non-nutritive sweet taste. J Comp Physiol Psychol 43:471–481

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner BF (1938) The behavior of organisms: an experimental analysis. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Sloman A (2001) Beyond shallow models of emotion. Cogn Process: Int Q Cogn Sci 2:177–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperber D (2000) Metarepresentations in evolutionary perspective. In: Sperber D (ed) Metarepresentations: a multidisciplinary perspective. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 117–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich KE (2004) The Robot’s rebellion: finding meaning in the age of Darwin. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterelny K (1990) The representational theory of mind: an introduction. Basil Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterelny K (1998) Intentional agency and the metarepresentation hypothesis. Mind Lang 13:11–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterelny K (2003) Mind in a hostile world. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Streidter GF (1998) Progress in the study of brain evolution: from speculative theories to testable hypotheses. Anat Rec 253:105–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Streidter GF (2005) The principles of brain evolution. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Suddendorf T, Busby J (2003) Mental time travel in animals? Trends Cogn Sci 7:391–396

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun R, Slusarz P, Terry C (2005) The interaction of the explicit and the implicit in skill learning: a dual-process approach. Psychol Rev 112:159–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson LW (2003) Brain architecture: understanding the basic plan. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Thelen E, Smith LB (1994) A dynamical systems approach to the development of cognition and action. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinbergen N (1951) The study of instinct. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Tooby J, Cosmides L (1990) The past explains the present: emotional adaptations and the structure of ancestral environments. Ethol Sociobiol 11:375–424

    Google Scholar 

  • Tooby J, Cosmides L (1992) The psychological foundations of culture. In: Barkow JH, Cosmides L, Tooby J (eds) The adapted mind: evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 19–136

    Google Scholar 

  • van den Heuvel O, Veltman DJ, Groenewegen HJ, Cath DC, van Balkom AJLM, van Hartskamp J, Barkhof F, van Dyck R (2005) Frontal-striatal dysfunction during planning in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry 62:301–309

    Google Scholar 

  • von Neumann J, Morgenstern O (1944) Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner GP (1996) Homologues, natural kinds and the evolution of modularity. Am Zool 36:36–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner W, Wagner GP (2003) Examining the modularity concept in evolutionary psychology: The levels of genes, mind and culture. J Cult Evol Psychol 1:135–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson JD, Crick FHC (1953) A structure for deoxyribose nucleic acid. Nature 171:737–738

    Google Scholar 

  • West-Eberhard MJ (2003) Developmental plasticity and evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • White RW (1959) Motivation reconsidered: the concept of competence. Psychol Rev 66:297–333

    Google Scholar 

  • Whiten A, Byrne RW (1991) The emergence of metarepresentation in human ontogeny and primate phylogeny. In: Whiten A (ed) Natural theories of mind. Basil Blackwell, London

  • Wilson TD (2004) Strangers to ourselves: discovering the adaptive unconscious. Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong R (2000) Motivation: a biobehavioural approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood JN, Grafman J (2003) Human prefrontal cortex: processing and representational perspectives. Nat Rev Neurosci 4:139–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Zacher P (2000) Psychological concepts and biological psychiatry: a philosophical analysis. John Benjamins, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Zacks JM, Tversky B (2001) Event structure in perception and conception. Psychol Bull 127:3–21

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thanks to Adam Biran, Kalina Christoff, Barbara Findlay, Carlos Gershenson, Ara Norenzayan, John Odling-Smee, Miguel Rubio-Godoy, Thomas Reydon, Beth Scott, Szymon Wichary and several anonymous reviewers for comments on earlier versions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert Aunger.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aunger, R., Curtis, V. Kinds of behaviour. Biol Philos 23, 317–345 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-007-9108-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-007-9108-4

Keywords

Navigation