Skip to main content
Log in

On maximal intermediate predicate constructive logics

  • Published:
Studia Logica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We extend to the predicate frame a previous characterization of the maximal intermediate propositional constructive logics. This provides a technique to get maximal intermediate predicate constructive logics starting from suitable sets of classically valid predicate formulae we call maximal nonstandard predicate constructive logics. As an example of this technique, we exhibit two maximal intermediate predicate constructive logics, yet leaving open the problem of stating whether the two logics are distinct. Further properties of these logics will be also investigated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chagrov, A. V., 1992, ‘The cardinality of the set of maximal intermediate logics with the disjunction property is of continuum’, Matematicheskie Zametki 51, 117–123, Russian.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chagrov, A. V., and M. V. Zacharyashev, 1991, ‘The disjunction property of intermediate prepositional logics’, Studia Logica 50, 189–216.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Church, A., 1956, Introduction to Mathematical Logic I, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ferrari, M., and P. Miglioli, 1995, ‘A method to single out maximal intermediate propositional logics with the disjunction property I’, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 76, 1–46.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ferrari, M., and P. Miglioli, 1995, ‘A method to single out maximal intermediate prepositional logics with the disjunction property II’, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 76, 117–168.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ferrari, M., and P. Miglioli, 1993, ‘Counting the maximal intermediate constructive logics’, The Journal of Symbolic Logic 58, 1365–1401.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Friedman, H., 1975, ‘On hundred and two problems in mathematical logic’, The Journal of Symbolic Logic 40, 113–129.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Görnemann, S., 1971, ‘A logic stronger than intuitionism’, The Journal of Symbolic Logic 58, 27–32.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Grzegorczyk, A., 1964, ‘A philosophically plausible interpretation of intuitionistic logic’, Indagationes Matematicae 26, 223–231.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gabbay, D. M., 1970, ‘The decidability of Kreisel-Putnam system’, The Journal of Symbolic Logic 35, 431–437.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gabbay, D. M., 1981, Semantical Investigations in Heyting's Intuitionistic Logic, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Galanter, G. I., 1990, ‘A continuum of intermediate logics which are maximal among the logics having the intuitionistic disjunctionless fragment’, Proceedings of 10th USSR Conference for Mathematical Logic, Alma Ata, Russian, 41.

  13. Harrop, R., 1960, ‘Concerning formulas of the types AB ∨ C, A → ∃B(x) in intuitionistic formal systems’, The Journal of Symbolic Logic 25, 27–32.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kirk, R. E., 1982, ‘A result on prepositional logics having the disjunction property’, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 23, 71–74.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kleene, S. C., 1952, Introduction to Metamathematics, Van Nostrand, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kolmogorov, A., 1925, ‘O principe tertium non datur’, Mat. Sb. 32, 646–667.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kreisel, G., and H. Putnam, 1957, ‘Eine Unableitbarkeitsbeweismethode für Intuitionistischen Aussagenkalkül’, Archiv für Mathematische Logik und Grundlagenforschung 3, 74–78.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Maksimova, L. L., 1984, ‘The number of aximal intermediate logics with the disjunction property’, Proceedings of 7th All-Union Conference for Mathematical Logic, Novosibirsk, Russian.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Maksimova, L.L., 1986, ‘On maximal intermediate logics with the disjunction property’, Studia Logica 45, 69–75.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Maksimova, L. L., D. P. Skvorkov and V. B. Sehtman, 1979, ‘The impossibility of a finite axiomatization of Medvedev's logic of finitary problems’, Soviet Mathematics Doklady 20, 394–398.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Minari, P., 1986, ‘Intermediate logics with the same disjunctionless fragment as intuitionistic logic’, Studia Logica 45, 207–222.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Medvedev, T., 1962, ‘Finite problems’, Soviet Mathematics Doklady 3, 227–230.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Miglioli, P., 1992, ‘An infinite class of maximal intermediate propositional logics with the disjunction property’, Archive for Mathematical Logic 31, 415–432.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Miglioli, P., U. Moscato and M. Ornaghi, 1994, ‘How to avoid duplications in a refutation system for intuitionistic logic and Kuroda logic’, Proceedings of 3rd Workshop on Theorem Proving with Analytic Tableaux and Related Methods, editor L. K. Broda and M. D'Agostino and R. Goré and R. Johnson and S. Reeves, Abington, U.K., May 4–6, 169–187.

  25. Miglioli, P., U. Moscato, M. Ornaghi and G. Usberti, 1989, ‘A constructivism based on classical truth’, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 30, 67–90.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Miglioli, P., U. Moscato, M. Ornaghi, S. Quazza and G. Usberti, 1989, ‘Some results on intermediate constructive logics’, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 30, 543–562.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ono, H., 1972, ‘A study of intermediate predicate logics’, Publications of the Research Institute for Mathematical Sciences 8, 619–649.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ono, H., 1987, ‘Some problems on intermediate predicate logics’, Reports on Mathematical Logic 21, 55–67.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Prawitz, D., 1965, Natural Deduction. A Proof-Theoretical Study, Almqvist-Wiksell.

  30. Prucnal, T., 1979, ‘On two problems of Harvey Friedman’, Studia Logica 38, 247–262.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Smorinski, C. A., 1973, ‘Applications of Kripke models’, Metamathematical Investigation of Intuitionistic Arithmetic and Analysis, A. S. Troelstra, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 344, Springer-Verlag.

  32. Troelstra, A.S., 1973, ‘Metamathematical Investigation of Intuitionistic Arithmetic and Analysis’, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 344, Springer-Verlag.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Avellone, A., Fiorentini, C., Mantovani, P. et al. On maximal intermediate predicate constructive logics. Stud Logica 57, 373–408 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00370841

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00370841

Key words

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation