Skip to main content
Log in

Just How Correct is Political Correctness? A Critique of the Opposition's Arguments

  • Published:
Argumentation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

I begin by examining three factors which enable the term ‘political correctness’ (hereafter PC) itself to feed into the hands of its opponents: namely, the trivialization of the actual issues which are attributed to PC, the villainization of those involved in the PC movement, and the conferring of a sense of legitimacy on the opposition movement.

The bulk of the paper provides a detailed summary and critique of every single articulated Canadian position I encountered against such PC measures as fair language policies. I have distinguished between arguments directed at the ideological content and the methodology of PC. Arguments directed at the ideological content are divided into the threat to freedom of expression argument, the threat to academic freedom argument, and the degeneration into triviality argument; arguments directed at the methdology are divided into the argument that PC commits the very evils that it addresses and the argument that PC uses unjust means to get its way.

The paper ends by claiming that if PC means minimizing sexual and racial harrassment, discourgaing homophobic, racist, and sexist discourse within educational settings, and curtailing policies which victimize oppressed groups, then political correctness is not merely correct, but morally obligatory as well.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Adam, Barry D.: 1994, ‘The Gap between the Precept and the Actual Practice of Academic Freedom’, CAUT Status of Women Supplement(1994), 6.

  • Ayim, Maryann: 1996, ‘Political Correctness: The Debate Continues’, in Diller, Ann, Barbara Houston, Kathryn Pauly Morgan and Maryann Ayim (eds.), The Gender Question in Education: Theory, Pedagogy, & Politics, Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado, pp. 199-214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayim, Maryann: 1993a, ‘The Moral Dimensions of Sexually Inclusive Language’, in Debra Shogan (ed.), A Reader in Feminist Ethics, Canadian Scholars’ Press Inc., Toronto, pp. 515-532.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayim, Maryann: 1993b, ‘Women in Management: Double Jeopardy Explored’, in Lou Hammond-Ketilson (ed.), Women in Management - Business Practice and Research: Scaling the Great Divide; Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Administrative Sciences Association of Canada - Women in Management Division, Vol. 14, No.11, Administrative Sciences Association of Canada, North York, Ontario, pp. 82-91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayim, Maryann: 1987, ‘Wet Sponges and Band-aids - A Gender Analysis of Speech Patterns’, in Greta Hofmann Nemiroff (ed.), Women and Men: Interdisciplinary Readings on Gender, Fitzhenry and Whiteside Limited, Canada, pp. 418-430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, Allan: 1987, The Closing of the American Mind; How Higher Education has Failed Democracy and Impoverished the Souls of Today’s Students, Simon and Schuster, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodribb, Somer: 1994, ‘Political Correctness in a Period of Reaction’, CAUT Status of Women Supplement(1994), 5.

  • Cline, Sally and Dale Spender: 1987, Reflecting Men at Twice their Natural Size, Andre Deutch Limited, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conlogue, Ray: 1991, ‘How Long Might It Take to Repair the Damage Wrought by the PC Movement?’, The Globe and Mail; Canada’s National Newspaper(June 11), C1.

  • Cook, Deborah. 1994, ‘Freedom of Speech Getting Lost in Shuffle’, Windsor Star(March 8), A7.

  • de Toro, Fernando: 1994, ‘Ontario’s Zero-tolerance Policy or The End of Academic Freedom: Between the Reign of Intellectual Terrorism and University Cleansing’, CAUT Bulletin(June), 15.

  • Delgado, Richard: 1993, ‘Words that Wound: A Tort Action for Racial Insults, Epithets, and Name Calling’, in Mari J. Matsuda, Charles R. Lawrence III, Richard Delgado and Kimberlè Williams Crenshaw (eds.), Words that Wound: Critical Race Theory, Assaultive Speech, and the First Amendment, Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado, pp. 89-110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delgado, Richard and David Yun: 1984a, ‘The Neoconservative Case against Hate-Speech Regulation - Lively, D’Souza, Gates, Carter, and the Toughlove Crowd’, Vanderbilt Law Review 47(6) (November), 1807-1825.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delgado, Richard and David Yun: 1984b, ‘Pressure Valves and Bloodied Chickens: An Analysis of Paternalistic Objections to Hate Speech Regulations’, California Law Review 82, 871-892.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drakich, Janice, Marilyn Taylor and Jennifer Bankier: 1995, ‘Academic Freedom Is the Inclusive University’, in Stephen Richer and Lorna Weir (eds.), Beyond Political Correctness: Towards the Inclusive University, University of Toronto Press, Toronto, pp. 118-135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drakich, Janice, Marilyn Taylor and Jennifer Bankier: 1994, ‘Rethinking Academic Freedom and Diversity’, CAUT Status of Women Supplement(1994), 1-4.

  • D’Souza, Dinesh: 1995, The End of Racism: Principles for a Multiracial Society, Free Press, New York.

  • D’Souza, Dinesh: 1991, Illiberal Education: The Politics of Race and Sex on Campus, The Free Press, A Division of Macmillan, Inc, New York.

  • Encyclopaedia Britannica: 1982, The New Encyclopaedia Britannica in 30 Volumes; Micropaedia, 15th ed.; Chicago, Geneva, London, etc.: The University of Chicago, Vol. V. 1st ed., 1768-1771.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fennell, Tom: 1991, ‘The Silencers: A New Wave of Repression is Sweeping through the Universities’, Maclean’s; Canada’s Weekly Newsmagazine(May 27), 40-43.

  • Fulford, Robert: 1994, ‘Defending the Right to be Offensive’, The Globe and Mail; Canada’s National Newspaper(February 2), C1.

  • Furedy, John J.: 1995, ‘CAUT’s Defence of Academic Freedom Under Attack’, CAUT Bulletin(February), 11.

  • Graham, Bill: 1994, ‘Don’t Sell Academic Freedom Short’, The Globe and Mail; Canada’s National Newspaper(February 14), A13.

  • Grogono, Peter: 1994, ‘“Academic freedom” called doublespeak’, CAUT Bulletin(April), 2.

  • Hamilton, Mykol Cecelia: 1988, ‘Using Masculine Generics: Does Generic HeIncrease Male Bias in the User’s Imagery?’, Sex Roles 19(11-12), 785-799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, Mykol Cecelia: 1985, ‘Linguistic Relativity and Sex Bias in Language: Effects of the Masculine “Generic” on the Imagery of the Writer and the Perceptual Discrimination of the Reader’, Dissertation Abstracts International 46, 1381B.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurst, Lynda: 1991, ‘“Politically Correct”? Think Before You Speak’, The Toronto Star(June 2), A1, A12.

  • Huxley, Aldous: 1946. Brave New World; A Novel, Harper and Row, Publishers, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ihle, Elizabeth L.: 1990, ‘Black Women’s Education in the South: The Dual Burden of Sex and Race’, in Joyce Antler and Sari Knopp Bilken (eds.), Changing Education: Women as Radicals and Conservators, State University of New York Press, Albany, NY, pp. 69-80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenish, D’Arcy and William Lowther: 1991, ‘A War of Words: Academics Clash over “Correctness”’, Maclean’s; Canada’s Weekly Newsmagazine(May 27), 44-45.

  • Keefer, Michael: 1991, ‘Tensions Exist but Maclean’s Article not Acceptable Account of Developments’, University Affairs(August/September), 19.

  • Kimura, Doreen: 1994. ‘Universities and the Thought Police’, The Globe and Mail; Canada’s National Newspaper(June 28), A19.

  • Kubara, Michael: 1994, ‘Review of Charles E. Curran’s Catholic Higher Education, Theology and Academic Freedom’, CAUT Bulletin(April), 19.

  • Lougheed, Tim: 1994, ‘How Far is Too Far?’, University Affairs(April), 6-7.

  • Lawrence, Charles R. III: 1993, ‘If He Hollers Let Him Go: Regulating Racist Speech on Campus’, in Mari J. Matsuda, Charles R. Lawrence III, Richard Delgado and Kimberlè Williams Crenshaw (eds.), Words that Wound: Critical Race Theory, Assaultive Speech, and the First Amendment, Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado, pp. 53-88.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKay, Donald G.: 1983, ‘Prescriptive Grammar and the Pronoun Problem’, in Barrie Thorne, Cheris Kramarae and Nancy Henley (eds.), Language, Gender and Society, Newbury House Publishers, Inc., Rowley, Massachusetts 01969, pp. 38-53.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKay, Donald G.: 1980, ‘Language, Thought and Social Attitudes’, in Howard Giles, W. P. Robinson and Philip M. Smith (eds.), Language: Social Psychological Perspectives; Selected Papers from the First International Conference on Social Psychology and Language held at the University of Bristol, England, Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp. 89-96.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, Catherine A.: 1993, Only Words, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martyna, Wendy: 1983, ‘Beyond the He/Man Approach: The Case for Nonsexist Language’, in Barrie Thorne, Cheris Kramarae and Nancy Henley (eds.), Language, Gender and Society, Newbury House Publishers, Inc., Rowley, Massachusetts 01969, pp. 25-37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsuda, Mari J.: 1993, ‘Public Response to Racist Speech: Considering the Victim’s Story’, in Mari J. Matsuda, Charles R. Lawrence III, Richard Delgado and Kimberlè Williams Crenshaw (eds.), Words that Wound: Critical Race Theory, Assaultive Speech, and the First Amendment, Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado, pp. 17-51.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCormack, Thelma: 1994, ‘Integrating Freedom of Expression and Equity’, CAUT Status of Women Supplement(1994), p. 9.

  • McCormack, Thelma: 1991, ‘Politically Correct’, Canadian Forum(September), 8-10

  • Melchers, Ron: 1994, ‘Self-serving Media Manipulated University Discrimination Story’, The Ottawa Citizen(March 1), A9.

  • Milne, Pamela J.: 1994, ‘Zero Tolerance Must Remain the Key’, Windsor Star(March 22), A6.

  • Newson, Janice: 1994, ‘“The Right to Offend” and the “Call to Civility”; Rhetorical Banners of the Liberal University’, CAUT Status of Women Supplement(1994), 8.

  • O’Neil, Robert M.: 1992, ‘A Time to Re-Evaluate Campus Speech Codes’, The Chronicle of Higher Education(July 8), A40.

  • Ontario Ministry of Education and Training: 1993a, Framework Regarding Prevention of Harassment and Discrimination in Ontario Universities.

  • Ontario Ministry of Education and Training: 1993b, Framework Regarding Prevention of Harassment and Discrimination in Ontario Colleges.

  • Orwell, George: 1976, Nineteen Eighty-fourin Animal Farm, Burmese Days, a Clergyman's Daughter, Coming Up for Air, Keep the Aspidistra Flying, and Nineteen Eighty-four, Martin Secker and Warburg Limited, London, England, 741-916.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orwell, George: 1954, Animal Farm, Harcourt, Brace, and World, Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, Charles Sanders: 1931–1958, Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, ed. by Charles Hartshorne, Paul Weiss, and Arthur Burks, 8 vols., Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettifor, Jean L.: 1994, ‘Academic Freedom in the Context of Ethics’, CAUT Status of Women Supplement(1994), 6.

  • Richer, Stephen and Lorna Weir: 1995, ‘Introduction: Political Correctness and the Inclusive University’, in Stephen Richer and Lorna Weir (eds.), Beyond Political Correctness: Towards the Inclusive University, University of Toronto Press, Toronto, pp. 3-20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadker, Myra and David Sadker: 1985, ‘Sexism in the Schoolroom of the’ 80s', Psychology Today 19(3) (March), 54-57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrank, Bernice: 1995, ‘Inclusivity, Tolerance and Hate Speech; A Review of Samuel Walker’s Hate Speech: The History of an American Controversy’, CAUT Bulletin(October), 10.

  • Shea, Victor: 1995, ‘Framing the “Western Tradition” in Canadian PC Debates’, in Stephen Richer and Lorna Weir (eds.), Beyond Political Correctness: Towards the Inclusive University, University of Toronto Press, Toronto, pp. 88-117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepelak, Norma J., Darlene Ogden and Diane Tobin-Bennett: 1984, ‘The Influence of Gender Labels on the Sex Typing of Imaginary Occupations’, Sex Roles 11(11-12), 983-996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slocum, Annabelle and Maryann Ayim: 1993, ‘The Concept of Caring in the Family Studies/Home Economics School Curriculum: A Feminist Appraisal’, in Debra Martens (ed.) with an introduction by Greta Hoffman Nemiroff, Weaving Alliances; Selected Papers Presented for the Canadian Women’s Studies Association at the 1991 and 1992 Learned Societies Conferences, Canadian Women’s Studies Association, Ottawa, pp. 77-96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Dorothy: 1995, ‘“Politically Correct”: An Ideological Code’, in Stephen Richer and Lorna Weir (eds.), Beyond Political Correctness: Towards the Inclusive University, University of Toronto Press, Toronto, pp. 23-50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Doug: 1991, ‘The “new McCarthyism”’, Canadian Dimension(September), 8-13.

  • Sniezek, Janet A. and Christine H. Jazwinski: 1986, ‘Gender Bias in English: In Search of Fair Language’, Journal of Applied Social Psychology 16(7), 642-662.

    Google Scholar 

  • Somners, Christina: 1991, ‘The Feminist Revelation’, in E. F. Paul, F. O. Miller and J. Paul (eds.), Ethics, Politics, and Human Nature, Basil Blackwell, London, pp. 141-158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sopinka, The Hon. John: 1994, ‘Freedom of Speech under Attack’, University Affairs(April), 13.

  • Spellman, J. W.: 1995, ‘Reader Backs Academic Freedom for Sikh Chair’, CAUT Bulletin(February), 8.

  • Spender, Dale: 1982, Invisible Women: The Schooling Scandal. Writers and Readers Publishing Cooperative Society Ltd., London, in association with Chameleon Editorial Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storm, Thomas: 1994, ‘Political Correctness Claim Angers Reader’, CAUT Bulletin(April), 2.

  • Switzer, Jo. Young: 1990, ‘The Impact of Generic Word Choices: An Empirical Investigation of Age-and Sex-Related Differences’, Sex Roles 22(1-2), 69-82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vickers, Jill: 1994, ‘Are Efforts to Renovate the Concept of Academic Freedom Useful?’, CAUT Status of Women Supplement(1994), 7.

  • Weir, Lorna, 1995, ‘PC Then and Now: Resignifying Political Correctness’, in Stephen Richer and Lorna Weir (eds.), Beyond Political Correctness: Towards the Inclusive University, University of Toronto Press, Toronto, pp. 51-87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Elizabeth and Sik Hung Ng: 1988, ‘Sex Bias in Visual Images Evoked by Generics: A New Zealand Study’, Sex Roles 18(3-4), 159-168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, John P.: 1994, ‘Freedom to Discuss the Unthinkable: Error of Opinion, said American Thomas Jefferson, may be tolerated as long as reason is left free to combat it. Does Ontario’s new “zero-tolerance” code fit in with such a philosophy?’, Windsor Star(March 31), A7.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ayim, M. Just How Correct is Political Correctness? A Critique of the Opposition's Arguments. Argumentation 12, 445–480 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007718113969

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007718113969

Navigation