Skip to main content
Log in

Plantinga’s Reformed Epistemology: What’s the Question?

  • Published:
International Journal for Philosophy of Religion Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Alvin Plantinga’s Warranted Christian Belief is without questionone of the central texts of the Reformed epistemology movement. Critiques of Plantinga’s defence have been both multiple and varied. As varied as these responses are, however, it is my contention that many of them amount to the same thing. It is the purpose of this paper to offer an overview of the main lines of attack that have been directed as Plantinga’s project, and thereafter to show how many, if not most, of these objections can be understood as versions or aspects of the same criticism, what I call the ’Inadequacy Thesis’.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baker, DP. Plantinga’s Reformed Epistemology: What’s the Question?. Int J Philos Relig 57, 77–103 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-004-1681-8

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-004-1681-8

Keywords

Navigation