Skip to main content
Log in

Enduring and Perduring Objects in Minkowski Space-Time

  • Published:
Philosophical Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

I examine the issue of persistence over time in thecontext of the special theory of relativity (SR). Thefour-dimensional ontology of perduring objects isclearly favored by SR. But it is a different questionif and to what extent this ontology is required, andthe rival endurantist ontology ruled out, by thistheory. In addressing this question, I take theessential idea of endurantism, that objects are whollypresent at single moments of time, and argue that itcommits one to unacceptable conclusions regardingcoexistence, in the context of SR. I then propose anddiscuss a plausible account of coexistence forperduring objects, which is free of these defects. This leaves the endurantist room for some maneuvers. I consider them and show that they do not really helpthe endurantist out. She can accommodate the notionof coexistence in the relativistic framework only atthe cost of renouncing central endurantist intuitions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Armstrong, D.M. (1980): 'Identity Through Time', in Peter van Inwagen (ed.), Time and Cause, Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 67-78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balashov, Y.V. (1998): 'Relativistic Objects', presented at the Central Division Meetings of the American Philosophical Association, Chicago, May 1998.

  • Callender, C. (1998): 'Is Presentism Worth Its Price?' a paper to be presented at the Symposium 'The Prospects for Presentism in Spacetime Theories', Philosophy of Science Association Biennial Meeting, Kansas City, October 1998.

  • Carter, W.R. and Hestevold, H.S. (1994): 'On Passage and Persistence', American Philosophical Quarterly 31, 269-283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clifton, R., and Hogarth, M. (1995): 'The Definability of Objective Becoming in Minkowski Spacetime', Synthese 103, 355-387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cushing, J.T. (1994): Quantum Mechanics: Historical Contingency and the Copenhagen Hegemony, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorato, M. (1996): 'On Becoming, Relativity, and Nonseparability', Philosophy of Science 63, 585-604.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earman, J. (1989): World Enough and Space-Time: Absolute Versus Relational Theories of Space and Time, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamow, G. (1970): My World Line: An Informal Autobiography, NewYork: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haslanger, S. (1989a): 'Endurance and Temporary Intrinsics', Analysis 49, 119-125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haslanger, S. (1989b): 'Persistence, Change, and Explanation', Philosophical Studies 56, 1-28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, M. (1990): The Ontology of Physical Objects: Four-dimensional Hunks of Matter, Cambridge: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinchliff, M. (1996): 'The Puzzle of Change', in J.E. Tomberlin (ed.), Philosophical Perspectives 10, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, pp. 119-136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, M. (1987): 'Is There A Problem About Persistence?', Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplement 61, 107-135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D. (1986): On the Plurality of Worlds, Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markosian, N. (1994): 'The 3D/4D Controversy and Non-Present Objects', Philosophical Papers 23, 243-49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maudlin, T. (1994): Quantum Non-locality and Relativity: Metaphysical Intimations of Modern Physics, Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, N. (1985): 'Are Probabilism and Special Relativity Incompatible?' Philosophy of Science 52, 23-43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mellor, D.H. (1981): Real Time, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merricks, T. (1994): 'Endurance and Indiscernibility', Journal of Philosophy 91, 165-184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merricks, T. (1995): 'On the Incompatibility of Enduring and Perduring Entities', Mind 104, 523-531.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minkowski, H. ([1908] 1952): 'Space and Time', in H.A. Lorentz, A. Einstein, H. Minkowski and H. Weyl (eds.), The Principle of Relativity, New York: Dover, pp. 73-91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, H. (1967): 'Time and Physical Geometry', Journal of Philosophy 64, 240-247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rietdijk, C. (1966): 'A Rigorous Proof of Determinism Derived From the Special Theory of Relativity', Philosophy of Science 33, 341-344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rietdijk, C. (1976): 'Special Relativity and Determinism', Philosophy of Science 43, 598-609.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savitt, S. (1998): 'There's No Time Like the Present (in Minkowski Spacetime)', a paper to be presented at the Symposium 'The Prospects for Presentismin Space-time Theories', Philosophy of Science Association Biennial Meeting, Kansas City, October 1998.

  • Sklar, L. (1985): Philosophy and Spacetime Physics, Berkeley, etc.: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, H. (1968): 'On Einstein-Minkowski Space-Time', Journal of Philosophy 65, 5-23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, H. (1991): 'On Relativity Theory and Openness of the Future', Philosophy of Science 58, 147-167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Inwagen, P. (1990): 'Four-dimensional Objects', Noûs 24, 245-255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, D. (1996): 'Persistence and Presentism', Philosophical Papers 25, 115-26.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Balashov, Y. Enduring and Perduring Objects in Minkowski Space-Time. Philosophical Studies 99, 129–166 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018684803885

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018684803885

Keywords

Navigation