Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A pilgrim's progress: From cognitive science to cooperative design

  • Published:
AI & SOCIETY Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper provides a glimpse of some different theoretical frameworks and empirical methods in the author's search for theories and practices that might improve the utility and usability of computer artifacts. The essay touches on some problematic aspects of currently accepted theories and techniques in the cognitive sciences, especially in their application to the field of human-computer interaction, and mentions some alternative conceptions based on a cultural-historical approach. The intent is to widen the nature of the debate about appropriate frameworks for discussing human activities especially when we discuss design activities in the context of computer systems development. The paper concludes with some suggestions for more fruitful research directions that involve the active participation of those for whom the research is ostensibly being done, and a greater emphasis on understanding how artifact design and use are inextricably intertwined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Backhurst, D. (1988). Activity, Consciousness, and Communication.The Quarterly Newsletter of the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition, April 1988, 10 (2) 31–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bannon, L. (in press). From Human Factors to Human Actors: The role of psychology and human-computer interaction studies in systems design. To appear in J. Greenbaum and M. Kyng (eds)Design at Work. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Hillsdale.

  • Bannon, L. (1986a) Issues in Design: Some Notes. In D. A. Norman and S. W. Draper (eds)User centered system design. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Hillsdale, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bannon, L. (1986b). Helping users help each other. In D. A. Norman and S. W. Draper (eds)User centered system design. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Hillsdale, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bannon, L. (1986c). Computer-mediated communication. In D. A. Norman and S. W. Draper (eds)User centered system design. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Hillsdale, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bannon, L. and Bødker, S. (in press) Beyond the Interface — Encountering Artifacts in Use. To appear in J. Carroll (ed)Designing Interaction: Psychological Theory at the Human-Computer Interface. Cambridge University Press. New York.

  • Bannon, L. and Schmidt, K. (1989). CSCW — Four Characters in Search of a Context. In S. Benford and J. Bowers (eds).Proceedings of First European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Gatwick, UK, Sept. 1989.

  • Barnard, P. and Grudin, J. (1988). Command names. In Helander, M. (ed.)Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction. North-Holland. Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjerknes, G., Ehn, P. and Kyng, M. (1987). Computers and democracy — a Scandinavian challenge. Gower, Aldershot, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boddy, D. and Buchanan, D. (1982). Information Technology and the Experience of Work. In Bannon, L., Barry, U. and Holst, O. (eds)Information Technology: Impact on the Way of Life. Tycooly, Dublin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bødker, S. (1987).Through the Interface — a Human Activity Approach to User Interface Design (DAIMI PB-224) Aarhus: University of Aarhus (To be published in book form by Lawrence Erlbaum Associates).

  • Bødker, S. (1989). A human activity approach to user interfaces.Human Computer Interaction.4(3) 171–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bødker, S. and Grønbæk, K. (1989). Cooperative Prototyping Experiments — Users and Designers Envision a Dental Case Record System. InProceedings of the First European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Gatwick, UK.

  • Card, S., Moran, T. and Newell, A. (1983).The psychology of human-computer interaction. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Hillsdale, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, M., John-Steiner, V., Scribner, S. and Souberman, E. (eds) (1978).Mind in Society, (by L. S. Vygotsky). Harvard University Press. Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehn, P. (1988).Work-oriented design of computer artifacts. Arbetslivscentrum/Almqvist & Wiksell International. Falköping, Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehn, P. and Kyng, M. (1987). The Collective Resource Approach to Systems Design. In G. Bjerknes, P. Ehn, and M. Kyng (eds)Computers and democracy — a Scandinavian challenge. Gower. Aldershot, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehn, P. and Kyng, M. (1984). A tool perspective on design of interactive computers for skilled workers. In M. Saaksjarvi (ed)Proceedings of 7th Scandinavian Research Seminar on Systemeering, Helsinki Business School, Helsinki, 211–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engeström, Y. (1987).Learning by Expanding. Orienta-Konsultit. Helsinki.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J. and Pylyshyn, Z. (1988). Connectionism and Cognitive Architecture: A Critical Analysis.Cognition,28. 3–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frese, M. and Sabini, J. (eds) (1985).Goal-Directed Behavior: The concept of action in psychology. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenbaum, J. and Kyng, M. (eds) (in press)Design at Work. Lawrence Erlbaum. Hillsdale.

  • Kozulin, A. (1986). The concept of activity in Soviet psychology.American Psychologist,41 (3), 264–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuutti, K. (draft) Activity theory and its applications to information systems research and development. Dept. of Information Processing Science, University of Oulu, Finland.

  • Landauer, T. (1987a). Psychology as a Mother of Invention. In J. Carroll, and P. Tanner (eds)Proceedings of CHI+GI'87, Human Factors in Computing Systems and Graphics Interface. Toronto, Canada. 333–335.

  • Landauer, T. (1987b). Relations between Cognitive Psychology and Computer Systems Design. In J. Carroll (ed) (1987).Interfacing Thought: Cognitive Aspects of Human-Computer Interaction. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J. (1988).Cognition in Practice. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leontiev, A. N. (1978).Activity, consciousness, and personality. Prentice-Hall. Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, A. and Simon, H. (1976). Computer Science as Empirical Enquiry: Symbols and Search.Communications of the ACM,19(3), 113–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D. (1980). Twelve Issues for Cognitive Science.Cognitive Science,4, 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pylyshyn, Z. (1984).Computation and Cognition: Towards a Foundation for Cognitive Science. MIT Press. Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raeithel, A. (in press). An activity-theoretical foundation for design. In R. Budde, C. Floyd, R. Keil-Slawik and H. Züllighoven (eds).Software Development and Reality Construction. Springer Verlag. Berlin.

  • Reason, P. and Rowan, J. (eds) (1981).Human Inquiry: A sourcebook of new paradigm research. John Wiley and Sons. Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbrock, H. (1981). Engineers and the Work that people do.IEEE Control Systems Magazine,1(3), 4–8; (Reprinted in Pylyshyn, Z. and Bannon, L. (eds) Perspectives on the Computer Revolution, New Jersey: Ablex, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheil, B. (1983). Coping with complexity.Office: Technology and People,1.

  • Smolensky, P. (1988). On the proper treatment of connectionism.Brain and Behavioral Sciences,11(1), 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Velichkovsky, B. and Zinchenko, V. (1982). New Perspectives on Cognitive Psychology. In L. Cohen, J. Los, H. Pfeiffer and K-P. Podewski (eds)Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science VI. North-Holland: Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. (1978).Mind in Society. Harvard University Press. Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertsch, J. V. (ed) (1981).The concept of activity in Soviet psychology. Sharpe. Armonk, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertsch, J. V. (1985).Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Harvard University Press. Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whiteside, J. and Wixon, D. (1987).Discussion: Improving Human Computer Interaction — a Quest for Cognitive Science. In J. Carroll (ed)Interfacing Thought, Cognitive Aspects of Human-Computer Interaction. MIT Press. Cambridge, MA. 353–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winner, L. (1980). Do artifacts have politics?Daedalus,109, 121–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winograd, T. and Flores, C. F. (1986).Understanding computers and cognition: A new foundation for design. Ablex. Norwood, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Computer Science Department, Aarhus University, DK 8000, Aarhus C, Denmark

    Liam J. Bannon

Authors
  1. Liam J. Bannon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

This paper originated from a talk entitled “From Cognitive Science to Cooperative Design” that later appeared in rough paper form in Finnemann, N. O. (Ed.) Proceedings from the Symposium Theories and Technologies of the Information Society (Centre for Cultural Research, Aarhus University, Denmark, Sept. 1989). Some of the ideas and material in the present paper first appeared in Bannon & Bødker (in press) and Bannon (in press).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bannon, L.J. A pilgrim's progress: From cognitive science to cooperative design. AI & Soc 4, 259–275 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01894031

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01894031

Keywords

Search

Navigation