Skip to main content
Log in

Modern Essentialism and the problem of individuation of spacetime points

  • Published:
Erkenntnis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper Modern Essentialism is used to solve a problem of individuation of spacetime points in General Relativity that has been raised by a New Leibnizian Argument against spacetime substantivalism, elaborated by Earman and Norton. An earlier essentialistic solution, proposed by Maudlin, is criticized as being against both the spirit of metrical essentialism and the fundamental principles of General Relativity. I argue for a modified essentialistic account of spacetime points that avoids those obstacles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, D. L.: 1993, ‘What is a Model-theoretic Argument?’, Journal of Philosophy 90, 311–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartels, A.: 1994, ‘What is Spacetime, if not a Substance?’, in U. Majer and H.-J. Schmidt (eds.), Semantical Aspects of Spacetime Theories, Bibliographisches Institut, Mannheim, pp. 41–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butterfield, J.: 1987, ‘Substantivalism and Determinism’, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 2, 10–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butterfield, J.: 1989, ‘Albert Einstein Meets David Lewis’, in A. Fine and J. Leplin (eds.), PSA 1988, Vol. 2, Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing, pp. 65–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butterfield, J.: 1989, ‘The Hole Truth’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 40, 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earman, J.: 1986, ‘Why Space is not a Substance (at Least not to First Degree)’, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 67, 225–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earman, J.: 1989, World Enough and Space-Time, MIT Press: Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earman, J. and J. Norton: 1987, ‘What Price Spacetime Substantivalism? The Hole Story’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 38, 515–525.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawking, S. W. and G. F. R. Ellis: 1973, The Large Scale Structure of Spacetime, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healey, R.: 1993, ‘Substance, Modality and Spacetime’, manuscript, forthcoming in Erkenntnis.

  • Kripke, S.: 1971, ‘Identity and Necessity’, in M. K. Munitz (ed.), Identity and Individuation, New York University Press: New York, pp. 135–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibniz, G. W.: 1875, Die philosophischen Schriften von G. W. Leibniz, herausgegeben von C. J. Gerhardt, Berlin 1875–90.

  • Leibniz, G. W.: 1985, Metaphysische Abhandlung, Meiner, Hamburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D.: 1968, ‘Counterpart Theory and Quantified Modal Logic’, Journal of Philosophy 65, 113–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D.: 1973, Counterfactuals, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D.: 1984, ‘Putnam's Paradox’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 62, 221–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D.: 1986, On the Plurality of Worlds, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, C.: 1993, ‘Manifold Substantivalism and the Inscrutability of Reference’, manuscript.

  • Mackie, P.: 1987, ‘Essence, Origin and Bare Identity’, Mind 66, 173–200.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maudlin, T.: 1988, ‘The Essence of Space-Time’, in A. Fine and J. Leplin (eds.), PSA, Vol. 2, Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing 1989, pp. 82–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maudlin, T.: 1988/89, ‘Keeping Body and Soul Together: The Z3 Puzzle and the Unity of Substances’, University of Dayton Review 19(3), 121–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maudlin, T.: 1990, ‘Substances and Space-Time: What Aristotle Would Have Said to Einstein’, Stud. Hist. Phil. Sci. 21(4), 531–561.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maudlin, T.: 1993, ‘Buckets of Water and Waves of Space: Why Spacetime is Probably a substance’, Philosophy of Science 60, 183–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mellor, D. H.: 1977, ‘Natural Kinds’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 28, 299–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mundy, B.: 1992, ‘Space-Time and Isomorphism’, in D. Hull, M. Forbes and K. Okruhlik (eds.), PSA, Vol. 1, Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing, pp. 515–525.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, J.: 1987, ‘Einstein, the Hole Argument and the Reality of Space’, in J. Forge (ed.), Measurement, Realism and Objectivity, Reidel, Boston, pp. 153–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, J.: 1988, ‘The Hole Argument’, in A. Fine and J. Leplin (eds.), PSA, Vol. 2, Philosophy of Science Association. East Lansing 1989, pp. 56–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohanian, H. C.: 1976, Gravitation and Spacetime, Norton & Comp., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plantinga, A.: 1982, ‘How to be an Anti-Realist’, Proceedings and Addresses of APA 56, 47–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Platts, M.: 1983, ‘Explanatory Kinds’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 34, 133–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, H.: 1975, ‘The Meaning of Meaning’, in K. Gunderson (ed.), Language, Mind and Knowledge, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, H.: 1983, Realism and Reason: Philosophical Papers, Vol. 3, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rynasiewicz, R.: 1992, ‘Rings, Holes and Substantivalism: On the Program of Leibniz Algebras’, Philosophy of Science 59, 572–589.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sober, E.: 1980, ‘Evolution, Population Thinking, and Essentialism’, Philosophy of Science 47 (1980), 350–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, D. E.: 1981, ‘Stripped Away: Some Contemporary Obscurities Surrounding Metaphysics Z 3 (1029 a 10.26)’, Phronesis 26, 177–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, D.: 1974, ‘Essentialism, Continuity, and Identity’, Synthese 23, 321–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, D.: 1975, ‘Identity, Designation, Essentialism and Physicalism’, Philosophia 5, 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, D.: 1980, Sameness and Substance, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, M.: 1993, ‘There's a Hole and a Bucket, Dear Leibniz’, in P. A. French, T. E. Uehling Jr. and H. K. Wettstein (eds.), Midwest Studies in Philosophy XVIII, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame 1993, pp. 202–241.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bartels, A. Modern Essentialism and the problem of individuation of spacetime points. Erkenntnis 45, 25–43 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00226369

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00226369

Keywords

Navigation