Abstract
In this paper Modern Essentialism is used to solve a problem of individuation of spacetime points in General Relativity that has been raised by a New Leibnizian Argument against spacetime substantivalism, elaborated by Earman and Norton. An earlier essentialistic solution, proposed by Maudlin, is criticized as being against both the spirit of metrical essentialism and the fundamental principles of General Relativity. I argue for a modified essentialistic account of spacetime points that avoids those obstacles.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, D. L.: 1993, ‘What is a Model-theoretic Argument?’, Journal of Philosophy 90, 311–322.
Bartels, A.: 1994, ‘What is Spacetime, if not a Substance?’, in U. Majer and H.-J. Schmidt (eds.), Semantical Aspects of Spacetime Theories, Bibliographisches Institut, Mannheim, pp. 41–51.
Butterfield, J.: 1987, ‘Substantivalism and Determinism’, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 2, 10–32.
Butterfield, J.: 1989, ‘Albert Einstein Meets David Lewis’, in A. Fine and J. Leplin (eds.), PSA 1988, Vol. 2, Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing, pp. 65–81.
Butterfield, J.: 1989, ‘The Hole Truth’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 40, 1–28.
Earman, J.: 1986, ‘Why Space is not a Substance (at Least not to First Degree)’, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 67, 225–244.
Earman, J.: 1989, World Enough and Space-Time, MIT Press: Cambridge, Mass.
Earman, J. and J. Norton: 1987, ‘What Price Spacetime Substantivalism? The Hole Story’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 38, 515–525.
Hawking, S. W. and G. F. R. Ellis: 1973, The Large Scale Structure of Spacetime, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Healey, R.: 1993, ‘Substance, Modality and Spacetime’, manuscript, forthcoming in Erkenntnis.
Kripke, S.: 1971, ‘Identity and Necessity’, in M. K. Munitz (ed.), Identity and Individuation, New York University Press: New York, pp. 135–164.
Leibniz, G. W.: 1875, Die philosophischen Schriften von G. W. Leibniz, herausgegeben von C. J. Gerhardt, Berlin 1875–90.
Leibniz, G. W.: 1985, Metaphysische Abhandlung, Meiner, Hamburg.
Lewis, D.: 1968, ‘Counterpart Theory and Quantified Modal Logic’, Journal of Philosophy 65, 113–26.
Lewis, D.: 1973, Counterfactuals, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
Lewis, D.: 1984, ‘Putnam's Paradox’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 62, 221–36.
Lewis, D.: 1986, On the Plurality of Worlds, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
Liu, C.: 1993, ‘Manifold Substantivalism and the Inscrutability of Reference’, manuscript.
Mackie, P.: 1987, ‘Essence, Origin and Bare Identity’, Mind 66, 173–200.
Maudlin, T.: 1988, ‘The Essence of Space-Time’, in A. Fine and J. Leplin (eds.), PSA, Vol. 2, Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing 1989, pp. 82–91.
Maudlin, T.: 1988/89, ‘Keeping Body and Soul Together: The Z3 Puzzle and the Unity of Substances’, University of Dayton Review 19(3), 121–133.
Maudlin, T.: 1990, ‘Substances and Space-Time: What Aristotle Would Have Said to Einstein’, Stud. Hist. Phil. Sci. 21(4), 531–561.
Maudlin, T.: 1993, ‘Buckets of Water and Waves of Space: Why Spacetime is Probably a substance’, Philosophy of Science 60, 183–203.
Mellor, D. H.: 1977, ‘Natural Kinds’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 28, 299–312.
Mundy, B.: 1992, ‘Space-Time and Isomorphism’, in D. Hull, M. Forbes and K. Okruhlik (eds.), PSA, Vol. 1, Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing, pp. 515–525.
Norton, J.: 1987, ‘Einstein, the Hole Argument and the Reality of Space’, in J. Forge (ed.), Measurement, Realism and Objectivity, Reidel, Boston, pp. 153–188.
Norton, J.: 1988, ‘The Hole Argument’, in A. Fine and J. Leplin (eds.), PSA, Vol. 2, Philosophy of Science Association. East Lansing 1989, pp. 56–64.
Ohanian, H. C.: 1976, Gravitation and Spacetime, Norton & Comp., New York.
Plantinga, A.: 1982, ‘How to be an Anti-Realist’, Proceedings and Addresses of APA 56, 47–77.
Platts, M.: 1983, ‘Explanatory Kinds’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 34, 133–148.
Putnam, H.: 1975, ‘The Meaning of Meaning’, in K. Gunderson (ed.), Language, Mind and Knowledge, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.
Putnam, H.: 1983, Realism and Reason: Philosophical Papers, Vol. 3, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Rynasiewicz, R.: 1992, ‘Rings, Holes and Substantivalism: On the Program of Leibniz Algebras’, Philosophy of Science 59, 572–589.
Sober, E.: 1980, ‘Evolution, Population Thinking, and Essentialism’, Philosophy of Science 47 (1980), 350–383.
Stahl, D. E.: 1981, ‘Stripped Away: Some Contemporary Obscurities Surrounding Metaphysics Z 3 (1029 a 10.26)’, Phronesis 26, 177–180.
Wiggins, D.: 1974, ‘Essentialism, Continuity, and Identity’, Synthese 23, 321–359.
Wiggins, D.: 1975, ‘Identity, Designation, Essentialism and Physicalism’, Philosophia 5, 1–30.
Wiggins, D.: 1980, Sameness and Substance, Blackwell, Oxford.
Wilson, M.: 1993, ‘There's a Hole and a Bucket, Dear Leibniz’, in P. A. French, T. E. Uehling Jr. and H. K. Wettstein (eds.), Midwest Studies in Philosophy XVIII, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame 1993, pp. 202–241.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bartels, A. Modern Essentialism and the problem of individuation of spacetime points. Erkenntnis 45, 25–43 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00226369
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00226369