Skip to main content
Log in

Ockham's Razor and the Anti-Superfluity Principle

  • Published:
Erkenntnis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

REFERENCES

  • Darden, L.: 1991, Theory Change in Science: Strategies from Mendelian Genetics, Oxford University Press, New York and Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, P. (ed.): 1967, The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Vol. 4, Macmillan The Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forster, M. and E. Sober: 1994, ‘How to Tell when Simpler, More Unified, or Less Ad Hoc Theories will Provide More Accurate Predictions’, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45, 1–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M.: 1983, Foundations of Space-Time Theories, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garber, D.: 1983, ‘Old Evidence and Logical Omniscience in Bayesian Confirmation Theory’, in J. Earman (ed.), Testing Scientific Theories, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys, P.: 1989, The Chances of Explanation, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitcher, P.: 1993, The Advancement of Science, Oxford University Press, New York and Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lange, M.: 1995, ‘Spearman's Principle’, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 46, 503–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton, I.: 1953, Newton's Philosophy of Nature: Selections from his Writings, Haffner, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nolan, D.: 1997, ‘Quantitative Parsimony’, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48, 329–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W.: 1966, ‘On Simple Theories of a Complex World’, in W. Quine (ed.), The Ways of Paradox, Random House, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B.: 1951, Mysticism and Logic, George Allen and Unwin, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B.: 1959, My Philosophical Development, Simon and Schuster, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, W.: 1984, Scientific Explanation and the Causal Structure of the World, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schapin, S. and S. Schaeffer: 1985, Leviathan and the Air Pump, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sober, E.: 1975, Simplicity, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sober, E.: 1981, ‘The Principle of Parsimony’, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 32, 145–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sober, E.: 1988, Reconstructing the Past: Parsimony, Evolution and Inference, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sober, E.: 1990, ‘Let's Razor Ockham's Razor’, in D. Knowles (ed.), Explanation and its Limits, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sober, E.: 1996, ‘Parsimony and Predictive Equivalence’, Erkenntnis 44, 167–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, D.: 1979, ‘Occam's Razor: A Principle of Intellectual Elegance’, American Philosophical Quarterly 16, 241–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton, D.: 1992, ‘Nonfallacious Arguments from Ignorance’, American Philosophical Quarterly 29, 381–387.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barnes, E.C. Ockham's Razor and the Anti-Superfluity Principle. Erkenntnis 53, 353–374 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026464713182

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026464713182

Navigation