Skip to main content
Log in

The distribution postulate in Bohm's theory

  • Published:
Topoi Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

On Bohm's formulation of quantum mechanics particles always have determinate positions and follow continuous trajectories. Bohm's theory, however, requires a postulate that says that particles are initially distributed in a special way: particles are randomly distributed so that the probability of their positions being represented by a point in any regionR in configuration space is equal to the square of the wave-function integrated overR. If the distribution postulate were false, then the theory would generally fail to make the right statistical predictions. Further, if it were false, then there would at least in principle be situations where a particle would approach an eigenstate of having one position but in fact always be somewhere very different. Indeed, we will see how this might happen even if the distribution postulate were true. This will help to show how loose the connection is between the wave-function and the positions of particles in Bohm's theory and what the precise role of the distribution postulate is. Finally, we will briefly consider two attempts to formulate a version of Bohm's theory without the distribution postulate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albert, D. Z.: 1992,Quantum Mechanics and Experience, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, J. S.: 1981, ‘Quantum mechanics for cosmologists’, reprinted in Bell, J. S. (1987, pp. 117–38).

  • Bell, J. S.: 1980, ‘De Broglie-Bohm, delayed-choice double-slit experiment, and density matrix’, reprinted in Bell, J. S. (1987, pp. 111–6).

  • Bell, J. S.: 1987,Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Theory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohm, D.: 1952, ‘A suggested interpretation of the quantum theory in terms of “hidden” variables, I and II’,Physical Review 85, 166–79 and 180–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohm, D. and Hiley, B. J.: 1993,The Divided Universe: An Ontological Interpretation of Quantum Theory, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Broglie, L.: 1930,An Introduction to the Study of Wave Mechanics, E. P. Dutton and Co., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeWitt, B. S. and Graham, Neill (eds.): 1973,The Many-Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Everett, H. III.: 1957, ‘“Relative state” formulation of quantum mechanics’,Reviews of Modern Physics 29, 454–62, reprinted in DeWitt and Graham (eds.) (1973).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Everett, H. III.: 1973, ‘Theory of the universal wave-function’, in DeWitt and Graham (eds.) (1973).

  • Hartle, J.: 1968, ‘Quantum mechanics of individual systems’,American Journal of Physics 36, 704–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Neumann, J.: 1932,Mathematische Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik, Springer, Berlin; reprinted and translated asMathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, in R. Beyer (trans.) Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barrett, J.A. The distribution postulate in Bohm's theory. Topoi 14, 45–54 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00763478

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00763478

Keywords

Navigation