Skip to main content
Log in

The language dependence of accuracy

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

David Miller has demonstrated to the satisfaction of a variety of philosophers that the accuracy of false quantitative theories is language dependent (cf. Miller 1975). This demonstration renders the accuracy-based mode of comparison for such theories obsolete. The purpose of this essay is to supply an alternate basis for theory comparison which in this paper is deemed the ‘knowledge-based’ mode of quantitative theory comparison. It is argued that the status of a quantitative theory as knowledge depends primarily on the ‘soundness’ of the measurement procedure which produced the theory; such soundness is invariant, on my view, under Milleresque translations. This point is the basis for the linguistic invariance of ‘knowledgelikeness’. When the aim of science is not construed simply in terms of the ‘truthlikeness’ or accuracy of theories, but in terms of the knowledge such theories embody, Miller's language dependence problem is overcome. One result of this analysis is that the possibility of objective scientific progress is restored, a possibility that Miller's analysis has prima facie defeated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Armstrong, D.: 1973, Belief, Truth, and Knowledge, Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galison, P.: 1987, How Experiments End, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstick, D. and B. O'Neill: 1988, ‘Truer’, Philosophy of Science 55, 503–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D.: 1974, ‘Popper's Qualitative Theory of Verisimilitude’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 25, 166–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D.: 1975, ‘The Accuracy of Predictions’, Synthese 30, 150–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D.: 1978, ‘Distance from the Truth as a True Distance’, in J. Hintikka, I. Niiniluoto, and E. Saarinen (eds.) Essays on Mathematical and Philosophical Logic, Reidel, pp. 415–35. Also printed in the 1977 Bulletin of the Section of Logic 6, 15–26, Institute of Philosophy and Sociology, Polish Academy of Sciences.

  • Miller, D.: 1982, ‘Impartial Truth’, Stochastic VI, 169–86. Also printed in Skala, H. J., S. Termini, and E. Trillas (eds.): 1984, Aspects of Vagueness, Reidel, Dordrecht, 75–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mott, P.: 1978, ‘Verisimilitude by Means of Short Theorems’, Synthese 38, 247–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niiniluoto, I.: 1984, ‘The Significance of Verisimilitude’, PSA 1984 2, 591–613.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oddie, G.: 1986, Likeness to Truth, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plato, The Meno, in Guthrie, W. K. C. (trans.): 1961, The Collected Dialogues of Plato, ed. by Edith Hamilton, and Huntington Carins, pp. 353–84, Bollingen Foundation, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tichý, P.: 1978, ‘Verisimilitude Revisited’, Synthese 38, 175–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urbach, P.: 1983, ‘Intimations of Similarity: The Shaky Basis of Verisimilitude’, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 34, 266–75.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

I am grateful to Noretta Koertge for numerous comments and criticisms. Thanks are also due to David Miller for clarification of several points in his (1975). Veronica Barnes also made a number of pertinent observations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barnes, E. The language dependence of accuracy. Synthese 84, 59–95 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00485007

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00485007

Keywords

Navigation