Abstract
Today there are two major theoretical frameworks in biology. One is the ‘chemical paradigm’, the idea that life is an extremely complex form of chemistry. The other is the ‘information paradigm’, the view that life is not just ‘chemistry’ but ‘chemistry-plus-information’. This implies the existence of a fundamental difference between information and chemistry, a conclusion that is strongly supported by the fact that information and information-based-processes like heredity and natural selection simply do not exist in the world of chemistry. Against this conclusion, the supporters of the chemical paradigm have pointed out that information processes are no different from chemical processes because they are both described by the same physical quantities. They may appear different, but this is only because they take place in extremely complex systems. According to the chemical paradigm, in other words, biological information is but a shortcut term that we use to avoid long descriptions of countless chemical reactions. It is intuitively appealing, but it does not represent a new ontological entity. It is merely a derived construct, a linguistic metaphor. The supporters of the information paradigm insist that information is a real and fundamental entity of Nature, but have not been able to prove this point. The result is that the chemical view has not been abandoned and the two paradigms are both coexisting today. Here it is shown that an alternative does exist and is a third theoretical framework that is referred to as the ‘code paradigm’. The key point is that we need to introduce in biology not only the concept of information but also that of meaning because any code is based on meaning and a genetic code does exist in every cell. The third paradigm is the view that organic information and organic meaning exist in every living system because they are the inevitable results of the processes of copying and coding that produce genes and proteins. Their true nature has eluded us for a long time because they are nominable entities, i.e., objective and reproducible observables that can be described only by naming their components in their natural order. They have also eluded us because nominable entities exist only in artifacts and biologists have not yet come to terms with the idea that life is artifact making. This is the idea that life arose from matter and yet it is fundamentally different from it because inanimate matter is made of spontaneous structures whereas life is made of manufactured objects. It will be shown, furthermore, that the existence of information and meaning in living systems is documented by the standard procedures of science. We do not have to abandon the scientific method in order to introduce meaning in biology. All we need is a science that becomes fully aware of the existence of organic codes in Nature.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Artmann, S. (2007). Computing codes versus interpreting life. Two alternative ways of synthesizing biological knowledge through semiotics. In M. Barbieri (Ed.), Introduction to Biosemiotics. The new biological synthesis (pp. 209–233). Dordrecht: Springer.
Artmann, S. (2009). Basic Semiosis as code-based control. Biosemiotics, 2(1), 31–38.
Barbieri, M. (2003). The organic codes. An introduction to semantic biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Barbieri, M. (2004). The definitions of information and meaning. Two possible boundaries between physics and biology. Rivista di Biologia-Biology Forum, 97, 91–110.
Barbieri, M. (2006). Life and Semiosis: the real nature of information and meaning. Semiotica, 158(1/4), 233–254.
Barbieri, M. (2008). Biosemiotics: a new understanding of life. Naturwissenschaften, 95, 577–599.
Battail, G. (2007). Information theory and error-correcting codes in genetics and biological evolution. In M. Barbieri (Ed.), Introduction to Biosemiotics (pp. 299–345). Dordrecht: Springer.
Battail, G. (2008). An outline of informational genetics. Morgan & Claypool Publishers.
Boniolo, G. (2003). Biology without Information. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 25, 255–273.
Bridgman, P. W. (1927). The logic of modern physics. Beaufort Books.
Chargaff, E. (1963). Essays on nucleic acids. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Collier, J. (2008). Information in Biological Systems. In P. Adriaans & J. van Benthem (Eds.), Handbook of philosophy of science, volume 8, philosophy of information. Elsevier.
Danchin, A. (2009). Bacteria as computers making computers. FEMS Microbiology Reviews, 33, 3–26.
Descartes, R. (1637). Discours de la Méthode. Leiden, The Netherlands.
Gell-Mann, M. (1994). The quark and the jaguar (p. 134). New York: W. H. Freeman.
Griffith, P. E. (2001). Genetic information: a metaphor in search of a theory. Philosophy of Science, 68, 394–412.
Griffith, P. E., & Knight, R. D. (1998). What is the developmental challenge? Philosophy of Science, 65, 276–288.
Johannsen, W. (1909). Elemente der exacten Erblichkeitslehre. Jena: Gustav Fischer.
Lartigue, C., Glass, J. I., Alperovich, N., Pieper, R., Parmar, P. P., Hutchison, C. A., III, Smith, H. O., & Venter, J. C. (2007). Genome transplantation in bacteria: changing one species to another. Science, 317, 632–638.
Mahner, M., & Bunge, M. (1997). Foundations of biophilosophy. Berlin: Springer Verlag.
Maynard-Smith, J. (2000). The concept of information in biology. Philosophy of Science, 67, 177–194.
Mayr, E. (1982). The growth of biological thought. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harward University Press.
Pattee, H. H. (1968). The physical basis of coding and reliability in biological evolution. In C. H. Waddington (Ed.), Toward a theoretical biology (Vol. 1, pp. 67–93). Edinburgh University Press.
Pattee, H. H. (1972). Laws and constraints, symbols and languages. In C. H. Waddington (Ed.), Towards a theoretical biology (Vol. 4, pp. 248–258). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Pattee, H. H. (1980). Clues from molecular symbol systems. In U. Bellugi & M. Studdart-Kennedy (Eds.), Signed and spoken language: Biological constraints on linguistic form (pp. 261–274). Dahlem Konferenzen: Verlag-Chemie.
Pattee, H. H. (1995). Evolving self-reference: matter, symbols, and semantic closure. Communication and Cognition - Artificial Intelligence, 12(1–2), 9–27. Special Issue Self-Reference in Biological and Cognitive Systems, Luis Rocha (ed.).
Pattee, H. H. (2001). The physics of symbols: bridging the epistemic cut. BioSystems, 60, 5–21.
Pattee, H. H. (2008). Physical and functional conditions for symbols, codes and languages. Biosemiotics, 1(2), 147–168.
Sarkar, S. (1996). Biological Information. A skeptical look at some central dogmas of molecular biology. In S. Sarkar (Ed.), The philosophy and history of biology (pp. 187–231). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
Sarkar, S. (2000). Information in genetics and developmental biology. Philosophy of Science, 67, 208–213.
Schrödinger, E. (1944). What is life? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Shannon, C. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Systems Technical Journal, 27, 379–424. 623–656.
Stent, G. S., & Calendar, R. (1978). Molecular genetics. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.
van Helmont, J.B. (1648). Ortus Medicinae. Amsterdam
von Neumann, J. (1951). General and logical theory of automata. In L. A. Jeffress (Ed.), Cerebral mechanisms of behavior, the hixon symposium, vol. 5, No. 9 (pp. 316–318). New York: Wiley.
von Neumann, J. (1958). The computer and the brain. New Haven: Yale University Press.
von Neumann, J. (1966). The theory of self-reproducing automata. Edited and completed by A. Burks, Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, Fifth Lecture, pp.74–87.
Wächtershäuser, G. (1997). The origin of life and its methodological challenge. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 187, 483–494.
Wigner, E. (1964). Events, laws, and invariance principles. Wigner’s Nobel Lecture, Stockholm, l0 Dec. 1963. Reprinted in Science 145, 995–999.
Yockey, H. P. (1974). An application of information theory to the Central Dogma and the sequence hypothesis. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 46, 369–406.
Yockey, H. P. (1992). Information theory and molecular biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Yockey, H. P. (2000). Origin of life on earth and Shannon’s theory of communication. Computers and Chemistry, 24, 105–123.
Yockey, H. P. (2005). Information theory, evolution, and the origin of life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Yockey, H. P., Platzman, R. L., & Quastler, H. (Eds.). (1958). Symposium on information theory in biology. New York and London: Pergamon.
Acknowledgments
I wish to thank Gérard Battail, Cliff Joaslyn and Joachim De Beule for calling my attention to some critical points in the original draft of this paper and for suggesting very useful amendments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Barbieri, M. The Paradigms of Biology. Biosemiotics 6, 33–59 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-012-9149-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-012-9149-1