Abstract
In this paper I shall compare two models of concept formation, both inspired by basic convictions of philosophical empiricism. The first, the connectionist model, will be exemplified by Kohonen maps, and the second will be my own dynamic theory of concept formation. Both can be understood in probabilistic terms, both use a notion of convergence or stabilization in modelling how concepts are built up. Both admit destabilization of concepts and conceptual change. Both do not use a notion of representation in some pregiven language, such as a language of thought or some logical language. Representation in a formal language only plays a role on the meta-level, namely within the theory about concept formation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bartsch, R.: 1986, ‘Context-Dependent Interpretation of Lexical Items’, in J. Groenendijk, D. de Jongh, and M. Stokhof (eds.), Pragmatics and Lexical Semantics. Selected Papers of the Fifth Amsterdam Colloquium. GRASS Series 7. Foris Publications, Dordrecht, pp. 1–26.
Bartsch, R.: 1987, ‘The Construction of Properties under Perspectives’, Journal of Semantics 5, 293–320.
Bartsch, R.: 1990, 1991, ‘Concepts Formation and Concept Composition’, ITLI Prepublication Series for Logic, Semantics, and Philosophy of Language LP 90-03, and in Bradley Franks (ed.), Word Meaning and Concepts. DYANA. ESPRIT Basic Research Action BR 3175, Deliverable R2.4 July 1991: 4–56.
Bartsch, R.: 1993, ‘Concept Formation and Understanding: An Overview’, in D. Nauta, A. Nijholt, J. Schaake (eds.), Pragmatics in Language Technology. Proceedings of the Fourth Twente Workshop on Language Technology, University of Twente, Department of Computer Science, P.O. Box 217, NL-7500 AE Enschede, pp. 71–86.
Goschke, Th. and D. Koppelberg: 1991, ‘The Concept of Representation and the Representation of Concepts in Connectionist Models’, in W. Ramsey, St. Stich, and D. E. Rumelhart (eds.), Philosophy and Connectionist Theory, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hilsdale, N.J.
Garson, J. W.: 1994, ‘Cognition without Classical Architecture’, Synthese 100, 291–305.
Hofstadter, D.: 1985, ‘Waking Up from a Boolean Dream, or Subcognition as Computation’, in Metamagical Themas: Questing for the Essence of Mind and Pattern, Basic Books, New York.
Husserl, E.: 1919/1921, Logische Untersuchungen. Max Niemeyer Verlag, Leipzig.
Kangas, J.: 1990, ‘Time-Delayed Self-organizing Maps’, in: I. Alexander and J. Taylor (eds.), Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Neural Networks 2. Vol. 1, San Diego. IEEE Neural Networks Council, Ann Arbor, MI, pp. 331–336.
Kohonen, T.: 1984, Self-organization and Associative Memory, Springer Verlag, Berlin, New York.
Kohonen, T.: 1991, ‘The Hypermap Architecture’, in T. Kohonen et al. (eds.), Artificial Neural Networks, vol. 2, pp. 1357–1362.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
A short version of this paper was given at the Fachtagung der Gesellschaft für Kognitionswissenschaft. Freiburg, October 12–15th, 1994.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bartsch, R. The relationship between connectionist models and a dynamic data-oriented theory of concept formation. Synthese 108, 421–454 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00413697
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00413697