Abstract
Engineering ethics is usually focused on engineers’ ethics, engineers acting as individuals. Certainly, these professionals play a central role in the matter, but engineers are not a singularity inside engineering; they exist and operate as a part of a complex network of mutual relationships between many other people, organizations and groups. When engineering ethics and engineers’ ethics are taken as one and the same thing the paradigm of the ethical engineer which prevails is that of the heroic engineer, a certain model of the ideal engineer: someone both quite individualistic and strong enough to deal with all the moral challenges that could arise. We argue that this is not the best approach, at least today in our interrelated world. We have achieved a high degree of independence from nature by means of technology. In exchange for this autonomy we have become increasingly tied up with very complex systems to which we constantly delegate new tasks and powers. Concerns about safety keep growing everywhere due to the fact that now we have a sensitive awareness of the huge amount of power we are both consuming and deploying, thus, new forms of dialogue and consensus have to be incorporated at different levels, in different forums and at different times. Within these democratic channels of participation not just the needs and interests, but also the responsibilities and mutual commitments of all parties should be taken into account.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adam, A. (2001). Heroes or sibyls? Gender and engineering ethics. IEEE Technology & Society Magazine, 20(3), 39–46.
Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. New Delhi: Sage.
Boyer, E. (1987). College: The undergraduate experience in America. New York: Harper & Row.
Broome, T. H., & Peirce, J. (1997). The heroic engineer. Journal of Engineering Education, 86(1), 51–55.
Bucciarelli, L. (2007). Ethics and engineering education: http://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/40284/ethics_20_talk.pdf?sequence=1. Accessed 24 May 2011.
Buck, P., et al. (1945). General education in a free society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Davis, M. (2003). What’s philosophically interesting about engineering ethics? Science and Engineering Ethics, 9(3), 353–361.
Durbin, P. T. (2008). Engineering professional ethics in a broader dimension. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 33(3), 226–233.
FEANI position paper on Code of Conduct: Ethics and Conduct of Professional Engineers. (2006). http://www.feani.org/webfeani/Statements/Position%20Paper%20Code%20of%20Conduct%20Ethics%20approved%20GA%202006.pdf. Accessed 23 Feb 2011.
Fleddermann, C. B. (2004). Engineering ethics (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education.
Fleischmann, S. T. (2004). Essential ethics–embedding ethics into an engineering curriculum. Science and Engineering Ethics, 10(2), 369–381.
Harris, C. E., Pritchard, M. S., & Rabins, M. J. (2009). Engineering ethics: Concepts & cases (4th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing.
IEEE Code of Ethics. (2006). http://www.ieee.org/portal/cms_docs/about/CoE_poster.pdf. Accessed 23 Feb 2011.
Johnson, D. (1991). Ethical issues in engineering. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Kline, R. R. (2001). Using history and sociology to teach engineering ethics. IEEE Technology & Society Magazine, 20(4), 13–20.
Leveson, N. G., & Turner, C. S. (1993). An investigation of the Therac-25 accidents. IEEE Computer, 26(7), 18–41.
Lynch, W. T., & Kline, R. (2000). Engineering practice and engineering ethics. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 25(2), 195–225.
Martin, M. W., & Schinzinger, R. (2005). Ethics in engineering (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
NSPE Code of Ethics for Engineers. (2007). http://www.nspe.org/Ethics/CodeofEthics/index.html. Accessed 23 Feb 2011.
Report of the Presidential Commission on the Space Shuttle Challenger Accident. (1986). http://science.ksc.nasa.gov/shuttle/missions/51-l/docs/rogers-commission/table-of-contents.html. Accessed 23 Feb 2011.
Stohl, C., Stohl, M., & Popova, L. (2009). A new generation of corporate codes of ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 90(4), 607–622.
United Nations Global Compact. (1999). http://www.unglobalcompact.org/. Accessed 23 Feb 2011.
Whitbeck, C. (1995). Teaching ethics to scientists and engineers: Moral agents and moral problems. Science and Engineering Ethics, 1(3), 299–308.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the anonymous referees for their valuable comments and suggestions on a previous version of this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Basart, J.M., Serra, M. Engineering Ethics Beyond Engineers’ Ethics. Sci Eng Ethics 19, 179–187 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-011-9293-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-011-9293-z