Abstract
In the end of the nineteenth century, there was a remarkable ‘empiricist attitude’ found among certain philosopher-scientists, an attitude which arguably emerged in the main as a reaction to the anti-scientific mood prevalent in the culture that time. Those philosopher-scientists, such as Mach and Hertz, were particularly anxious to emphasize and laud the privileged status of the empirical dimension ofour scientific knowledge, distinguishing it carefully from the theoretical constructions and hypothetical entities that are ordinarily posited by scientists. Yet, as I exhibit in this article, there were certain crucial philosophical differences between these two thinkers with respect to their general conception of scientific theories and scientific norms guiding the activity. I suggest further that the most central difference in this context between Mach and Hertz can justifiably (and, perhaps, more fruitfully) be articulated and reckoned in traditional andcontemporary epistemological terms.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Baç , M.: 1999, 'Propositional Knowledge and the Enigma of Realism', Philosophia 27(1-2), 199-223.
BonJour, L.: 1994, 'Against Naturalized Epistemology' in P. A. French, T. E. Uehling, and H. K. Wettstein (eds.), Midwest Studies in Philosophy: Philosophical Naturalism XIX.
Bradley, J.: 1971, Mach's Philosophy of Science, The Athlone Press, London.
Cassirer, E.: 1966, The Problem of Knowledge, Yale University Press, New Haven.
Cohen, R. C.: 1970, 'Ernst Mach: Physics, Perception and the Philosophy of Science', in R. S. Cohen and R. J. Seeger (eds.), Ernst Mach: Physicist and Philosopher, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. VI, D. Reidel Publ. Co., Dordrecht, pp. 126-164.
Edwards, P. (ed. in chief): 1967, The Encyclopedia of Philosophy 3-4, 5, The Macmillan Company and the Free Press, New York.
Feyerabend, P. K.: 1984, 'Mach's Theory of Research and Its Relation to Einstein', in Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 15, 1-22.
Frank, P.: 1949, Modern Science and Its Philosophy, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
Frank, P.: 1970, 'The Importance of Ernst Mach's Philosophy of Science for Our Times', in R. S. Cohen and R. J. Seeger (eds.), Ernst Mach: Physicist and Philosopher, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. VI, D. Reidel Publ. Co., Dordrecht, pp. 219-234.
Giere, R. N.: 1988, Explaining Science: A Cognitive Approach, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Hertz, H.: [1894], 1956, The Principles of Mechanics, Dover Publ. Inc., New York.
Höffding, H.: 1915, Modern Philosophers, tr. by A. C. Mason, Macmillan and Co., London.
Kitcher, P.: 1992, 'The Naturalists Return', The Philosophical Review 101(1), 53-114.
Kockelmans, J. J.: 1968, Philosophy of Science, The Free Press, New York.
Kornblith, H.: 1994, 'What is Naturalistic Epistemology?' in H. Kornblith (ed.), Naturalizing Epistemology, 2nd ed., The MIT Press, Cambridge.
Loparic, Z.: 1984, 'Problem-Solving and Theory Structure in Mach', in Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 15, 23-49.
Mach, E.: [1883], 1960, The Science of Mechanics, The Open Court Publ. Co., Chicago.
Mach, E.: [1886], 1959, The Analysis of Sensation, tr. by C.M.Williams, Dover Publ. Inc., New York.
Mach, E.: [1894], 1910, 'On the Principle of Comparison in Physics', in Popular Scientific Lectures, 4th ed., tr. by T. J. McCormack, The Open Court Publ. Co., Chicago, pp. 236-258.
Mach, E.: [1905], 1967, 'The Significance and Purpose of Scientific Laws', in A. Danto and S. Morgenbesser (eds.), Philosophy of Science, The World Publishing Co., New York, pp. 266-273.
Morrison, M.: 1995, 'Scientific Conclusions and Philosophical Arguments: An Inessential Tension', in J. Z: Buchwald (ed.), Scientific Practice: Theories and Stories of Doing Physics, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 224-256.
Quine, W. V.: 1994, 'Epistemology Naturalized' in H. Kornblith (ed.), Naturalizing Epistemology, 2nd ed., The MIT Press, Cambridge.
Von Misses, R.: 1970, 'Mach and the Empiricist Conception of Science', in R. S. Cohen and R. J. Seeger (eds.), Ernst Mach: Physicist and Philosopher, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. VI, D. Reidel Publ. Co., Dordrecht, pp. 247-270.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
BaÇ, M. Structure versus process: Mach, Hertz, and the Normative Aspect of Science. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 31, 39–56 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008334407481
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008334407481