Skip to main content
Log in

Theories between theories: Asymptotic limiting intertheoretic relations

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper addresses a relatively common “scientific” (as opposed to philosophical) conception of intertheoretic reduction between physical theories. This is the sense of reduction in which one (typically newer and more refined) theory is said to reduce to another (typically older and “coarser”) theory in the limit as some small parameter tends to zero. Three examples of such reductions are discussed: First, the reduction of Special Relativity (SR) to Newtonian Mechanics (NM) as (v/c)2→0; second, the reduction of wave optics to geometrical optics as λ → 0; and third, the reduction of Quantum Mechanics (QM) to Classical Mechanics (CM) asħ→0. I argue for the following two claims. First, the case of SR reducing to NM is an instance of a genuine reductive relationship while the latter two cases are not. The reason for this concerns the nature of the limiting relationships between the theory pairs. In the SR/NM case, it is possible to consider SR as a regular perturbation of NM; whereas in the cases of wave and geometrical optics and QM/CM, the perturbation problem is singular. The second claim I wish to support is that as a result of the singular nature of the limits between these theory pairs, it is reasonable to maintain that third theories exist describing the asymptotic limiting domains. In the optics case, such a theory has been called “catastrophe optics”. In the QM/CM case, it is semiclassical mechanics. Aspects of both theories are discussed in some detail.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Airy, G.B.: 1838, ‘On the Intensity of Light in the Neighborhood of a Caustic’,Transactions of the Cambridge Philosophical Society,6, 379–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, V.I.: 1989,Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics, Second Edition, (trans.) K. Vogtmann and A. Weinstein, Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batterman, R.: 1991, ‘Chaos, Quantization, and the Correspondence Principle’,Synthese 89, 189–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batterman, R.: 1993a, ‘Defining Chaos’,Philosophy of Science 60, 43–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batterman, R.: 1993b, ‘Quantum Chaos and Semiclassical Mechanics’,PSA 1992, vol. 2, 50–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bender, C. M. and Orszag, S. A.: 1978,Advanced Mathematical Methods for Scientists and Engineers, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, M. V.: 1981, ‘Singularities in Waves and Rays’, in R. Balian, M. Kléman and J. P. Poirier (eds.),Physics of Defects (Les Houches, Session XXXV, 1980), North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 453–543.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, M. V.: 1983, ‘Semiclassical Mechanics of Regular and Irregular Motion’, in G. Iooss, R. H. G. Helleman, and R. Stora (eds.),Chaotic Behavior of Deterministic Systems, (Les Houches Session XXXVI, 1981), North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 171–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, M. V.: 1986, ‘Twinkling Exponents in the Catastrophe Theory of Random Short Waves’, in B. J. Uscinski (ed.),Wave Propagation and Scattering, Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp. 11–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, M. V.: 1991, ‘Some Quantum-to-Classical Asymptotics’, in M. J. Giannoni, A. Voros, and J. Zinn-Justin (eds.),Chaos and Quantum Physics (Les Houches Session LII, 1989), North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 253–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, M. V., Balazs, N. L., Tabor, M. and Voros, A.: 1979, ‘Quantum Maps’,Annals of Physics 122, 26–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, M. V. and Upstill, C.: 1980, ‘Catastrophe Optics: Morphologies of Caustics and their Diffraction Patterns’, in E. Wolf (ed.),Progress in Optics XVIII, North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 257–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, A. and D. Wallace: 1989, ‘Critical Point Phenomena: Universal Physics at Large Length Scales’, in Paul Davies (ed.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 236–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, H.: 1950,Classical Mechanics, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, E. J.: 1991, ‘Wavepacket Dynamics and Quantum Chaology’, in G. Iooss, R. H. G. Helleman, and R. Stora (eds.),Chaotic Behavior of Deterministic Systems, (Les Houches Session XXXVI, 1981), North-Holalnd, Amsterdam, pp. 547–663.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, R.: 1991, ‘Realism About What?’,Philosophy of Science 58, 185–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Littlejohn, R. G.: 1992, ‘The Van Vleck Formula, Maslov Theory, and Phase Space Geometry’,Journal of Statistical Physics 68(1/2), 7–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maslov, V. P. and Fedoriuk, M. V.: 1981,Semi-classical Approximation in Quantum Mechanics, (trans.) J. Niederle and J. Tolar, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickles, T.: 1973, ‘Two Concepts of Intertheoretic Reduction’,The Journal of Philosophy LXX(7), 181–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Connor, P., Tomsovic, S. and Heller, E. J.: 1992, ‘Semiclassical Dynamics in the Strongly Chaotic Regime: Breaking the Log Time Barrier’,Physica D 55, 340–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poston, T. and Stewart, I.: 1978,Catastrophe Theory and its Applications, Pitman, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radder, H.: 1991, ‘Heuristics and the Generalized Correspondence Principle’,British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 42, 195–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohrlich, F.: 1988, ‘Pluralistic Ontology and Theory Reduction in the Physical Sciences’,British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 39, 295–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohrlich, F.: 1989, ‘The Logic of Reduction: The Case of Gravitation’,Foundations of Physics 19, 1151–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohrlich, F.: 1990, ‘There is Good Physics in Theory Reduction’,Foundations of Physics 20, 1399–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohrlich, F. and Hardin, L.: 1983, ‘Established Theories’,Philosophy of Science 50, 603–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sklar, L.: 1967, ‘Types of Inter-theoretic Reduction’,British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 18, 109–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabor, M.: 1989,Chaos and Integrability in Nonlinear Dynamics: An Introduction, John Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

I wish to thank Roger Jones and Joe Mendola for valuable comments on this and related work. Discussions with Bill Wimsatt also helped me get clear about certain issues related to intertheoretic reductions. Of course, they are not responsible for any mistakes and misinterpretations that still remain.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Batterman, R.W. Theories between theories: Asymptotic limiting intertheoretic relations. Synthese 103, 171–201 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01090047

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01090047

Keywords

Navigation