Skip to main content
Log in

The proximate/ultimate distinction in the multiple careers of Ernst Mayr

  • Published:
Biology and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ernst Mayr's distinction between “ultimate” and “proximate” causes is justly considered a major contribution to philosophy of biology. But how did Mayr come to this “philosophical” distinction, and what role did it play in his earlier “scientific” work? I address these issues by dividing Mayr's work into three careers or phases: 1) Mayr the naturalist/researcher, 2) Mayr the representative of and spokesman for evolutionary biology and systematics, and more recently 3) Mayr the historian and philosopher of biology. If we want to understand the role of the proximate/ultimate distinction in Mayr's more recent career as a philosopher and historian, then it helps to consider hisearlier use of the distinction, in the course of his research, and in his promotion of the professions of evolutionary biology and systematics. I believe that this approach would also shed light on some other important “philosophical” positions that Mayr has defended, including the distinction between “essentialism: and “population thinking.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Allen, Garland: 1975,Life Science in the Twentieth Century, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, Garland: 1978,Thomas Hunt Morgan: The Man and His Science, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, John R.: 1938, ‘The Evolution of Breeding Seasons,’ in G. R. de Beer (ed.),Evolution: Essays on Aspects of Evolutionary Biology, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beatty, John: 1990a: ‘Teleology and the Relationship of Biology to the Physical Sciences in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries’, in F. Durham and R. Purrington (eds.),Newton's Legacy: The Origins and Influence of Newtonian Science, Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beatty, John: 1990b, ‘Evolutionary Anti-Reductionism: Historical Reflections’,Biology & Philosophy 5, 199–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cain, Joseph: 1993, ‘Common Problems and Cooperative Solutions: Organizational Activity in Evolutionary Studies, 1936–1947’,Isis 84, 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cain, Joseph: 1994, ‘Ernst Mayr asCommunity Architect: Launching the Society for the Study of Evolution and the JournalEvolution, Biology & Philosophy, this issue.

  • Chapman, Frank M.: 1903,Bird-Life: A Guide to the Study of Our Common Birds, Appleton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cittadino, Eugene: 1980, ‘Ecology and the Professionalization of Botany in America, 1890–1905’,Studies in the History of Biology 4, 171–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eifrig, G.: 1924, ‘Is Photoperiodism a Factor in the Migration of Birds?’,Auk 41, 439–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerard, R. W., ed.: 1958,Concepts of Biology. National Academy of Sciences — National Research Council, Washington, D. C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, John C.: 1986, ‘The History of Ideas Revisited’,Revue de Synthese 4, 201–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haeckel, Ernst: 1899,The Riddle of the Universe, translated in 1900 by Joseph McCabe, Harper, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagen, Joel B.: 1986, ‘Ecologists and Taxonomists: Divergent Traditions in Twentieth-Century Plant Geography’,Journal of the History of Biology 19, 197–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagen, Joel B.: 1991, ‘Organism and Environment: Frederick Clements's Vision of a Unified Physiological Ecology’, in Ronald Raingeret al. (eds.),The American Development of Biology, Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesse, Richard: 1922,Abstammungslehre und Darwinismus (6th ed.), Teubner, Leipzig.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesse, Richard: 1924,Teirgeographie auf ökologischer Grundlage, Fisher, Jena.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesse, Richard, W. C. Allee and Karl P. Schmidt: 1937,Ecological Animal Geography, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huxley, Julian: 1916, ‘Bird-Watching and Biological Science: Some Observations on the Study of Courtship in Birds’,Auk 331, 142–161, 256–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellogg, Vernon: 1907,Darwinism To-Day, Holt, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lack, David: 1954,The Natural Regulation of Animal Numbers, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loeb, Jacques: 1906,The Dynamics of Living Matter, Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loeb, Jacques: 1916,The Organism as a Whole, from a Physico-Chemical Standpoint, Putnam, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loeb, Jacques: 1918,Forced Movements, Tropisms, and Animal Conduct, Lippincott, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, Ernst: 1926, ‘Die Ausbreitung des Girlitz (Serinus canaria serinus L.): Ein Beitrag zur Tiergeographie’,Journal für Ornithologie 74, 569–671.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, Ernst and Wilhelm Meise: 1930. ‘Theoretisches zur Geschichte des Vogelzuges’,Der Vogelzug 1, 149–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, Ernst: 1932, ‘A Tenderfoot Explorer in New Guinea’,Natural History 32 (1), 83–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, Ernst: 1942,Genetics and the Origin of Species, Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, Ernst: 1961, ‘Cause and Effect in Biology’,Science 134, 1501–1506.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, Ernst: 1963a,Animal Species and Evolution, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, Ernst: 1963b, ‘The New versus the Classical in Biology’,Science 141, 763.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, Ernst: 1969a, ‘Annual Report, 1967–1968’, Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, Ernst: 1969b, ‘The Museum of Comparative Zoology and its Role in the Harvard Community’, Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, Ernst: 1969c, ‘Discussion: Footnotes on the Philosophy of Biology’,Philosophy of Science 36, 197–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, Ernst: 1982a, ‘Recollections on My Scientific Development’, manuscript provided by Mayr.

  • Mayr, Ernst: 1982b,The Growth of Biological Thought, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, Ernst: 1986, ‘The Death of Darwin?’Revue de Synthèse 4, 229–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, Alexander: 1985,The Structure of Biological Science, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowan, William: 1931,The Riddle of Migration, Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shäfer, E. A.: 1907, ‘On the Incidence of Daylight as a Determining Factor in Bird-Migration’,Nature 77, 159–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, George Gaylord: 1964,This View of Life, Harcourt Brace, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smocovitis, V. Betty: 1992, ‘Unifying Biology: The Evolutionary Synthesis and Evolutionary Biology’,Journal of the History of Biology 25, 1–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smocovitis, V. Betty: 1994, ‘Organizing Evolution: Founding the Society for the Study of Evolution,’Journal of the History of Biology 27, 241–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, A. Landsborough: 1924, ‘Photoperiodism in Bird Migration’,Auk 41, 639–641.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, A. Landsborough: 1926,Problems of Bird-Migration, Witherby, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, J. Arthur: 1920,The System of Animate Nature, Holt, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, J. Arthur: 1923,The Biology of Birds, Sidgwick and Jackson, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinbergen, Nikolaas: 1951,The Study of Instinct, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinbergen, Niolaas: 1963, ‘On the Aims and Methods of Ethology’,Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 20, 410–433.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

I would like to thank Mark Adams, Joe Cain, Jane Maienschein, and Marc Swetlitz for their help. Thanks also to John Greene for organizing this tribute to Ernst Mayr. And thanks to Ernst Mayr for providing the occasion, through his many contributions in so many roles.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Beatty, J. The proximate/ultimate distinction in the multiple careers of Ernst Mayr. Biol Philos 9, 333–356 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00857940

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00857940

Key words

Navigation