Abstract
Modeling risk in a prescriptively plausible way represents a major issue in decision theory. The benchmarking procedure, being based on the satisficing principle and providing a probabilistic interpretation of expected utility (EU) theory, is prescriptive. Because it is a target-based language, the benchmarking procedure can be applied naturally to finance. In finance, the centrality of risk is widely recognized, but the risk measures that are commonly used to assess risk are too poor as a decision making tool. In this paper we propose a two-stage decision criterion of choice under risk that provides an application of benchmarking to finance through a risk measure. We will analyze some nonexpected utility theories, in particular lottery dependent utility, as potential frameworks for our criterion.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
M. Abdellaoui B. Munier (1998) ArticleTitleThe risk-structure dependence effect: experimenting with an eye to decision-aid Annals of Operations Research 80 237–252 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1018916031387
P. Artzner F. Delbaen J.M. Eber D. Heath (1997) ArticleTitleThinking coherently Risk 10 68–71
P. Artzner F. Delbaen J.M. Eber D. Heath (1999) ArticleTitleCoherent measures of risk Mathematical Finance 9 IssueID3 203–228 Occurrence Handle10.1111/1467-9965.00068
E.R. Arzac (1976) ArticleTitleProfits and safety in the theory of the firm under price uncertainty International Economic Review 17 IssueID1 163–171
J.L. Becker R.K. Sarin (1987) ArticleTitleLottery dependent utility Management Science 33 IssueID11 1367–1382
D. Bell (1982) ArticleTitleRegret in decision making under uncertainty Operations Research 30 IssueID5 961–981
D. Bell (1985) ArticleTitleDisappointment in decision making under uncertainty Operations Research 33 IssueID1 1–27 Occurrence Handle10.1287/opre.33.1.1
H. Bleichrodt J.L. Pinto P. Wakker (2001) ArticleTitleMaking descriptive use of prospect theory to improve the prescriptive use of expected utility Management Science 47 IssueID11 1498–1514 Occurrence Handle10.1287/mnsc.47.11.1498.10248
R.F. Bordley M. Li Calzi (2000) ArticleTitleDecision analysis using targets instead of utility functions Decisions in Economics and Finance 23 IssueID1 53–74 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s102030050005
R.F. Bordley C.W. Kirkwood (2004) ArticleTitleMultiattribute preference analysis with performance targets Operations Research 52 IssueID6 823–835 Occurrence Handle10.1287/opre.1030.0093
E. Castagnoli M. Li Calzi (1996) ArticleTitleExpected utility without utility Theory and Decision 41 281–301 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00136129
E. Castagnoli M. Li Calzi (1999) ArticleTitleNonexpected utility theories and benchmarking under risk SZIGMA 29 199–211
P.C. Fishburn (1977) ArticleTitleMean-risk analysis with risk associated with below-target returns American Economic Review 67 116–126
G. Gigerenzer R. Selten (2001) Bounded Rationality: The Adaptive Toolbox MIT Press Cambridge, MA
P. Jorion (1997) Value At Risk: The New Benchmark For Controlling Market Risk Irwin Chicago
D. Kahneman A. Tversky (1979) ArticleTitleProspect theory: an analysis of decision under risk Econometrica 47 IssueID2 263–292
S. Kataoka (1963) ArticleTitleA stochastic programming model Econometrica 31 IssueID1/2 181–196
G. Loomes R. Sugden (1982) ArticleTitleRegret theory: an alternative theory of rational choice under uncertainty Economic Journal 92 IssueID368 805–824 Occurrence Handle10.2307/2232669
G. Loomes R. Sugden (1986) ArticleTitleDisappointment and dynamic consistency in choice under uncertainty Review of Economic Studies 53 IssueID2 271–282 Occurrence Handle10.2307/2297651
M. J. Machina (1982) ArticleTitleExpected utility analysis without the independence axiom Econometrica 50 277–323
P. Modesti (2003) ArticleTitleLottery-dependent utility via stochastic benchmarking Theory and Decision 55 IssueID1 45–57 Occurrence Handle10.1023/B:THEO.0000019077.14252.9c
B. Munier (1999) ArticleTitleTwo stage rationality under risk: experimental results and perspectives Rivista di Matematica per le Scienze Economiche e Sociali 21 IssueID1/2 3–23
J. Quiggin (1982) ArticleTitleA theory of anticipated utility Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 3 IssueID4 323–343 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0167-2681(82)90008-7
A.D. Roy (1952) ArticleTitleSafety first and the holding of assets Econometrica 20 IssueID3 431–449
R.K. Sarin M. Weber (1993) ArticleTitleRisk-value models European Journal of Operational Research 70 IssueID2 135–149 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0377-2217(93)90033-J
U. Schmidt (2001) ArticleTitleLottery dependent utility: a reexamination Theory and Decision 50 IssueID1/2 35–58 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1005219005058
U. Schmidt (2003) ArticleTitleThe axiomatic basis of risk-value models European Journal of Operational Research 145 IssueID1 216–220 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00200-X
H.A. Simon (1955) ArticleTitleA behavioral model of rational choice Quarterly Journal of Economics 69 IssueID1 99–118 Occurrence Handle10.2307/1884852
H.A. Simon (1956) ArticleTitleRational choice and the structure of the environment Psychological Review 63 129–138 Occurrence Handle10.1037/h0042769
H.A. Simon (1995) ArticleTitleThe information-processing theory of mind The American Psychologist 50 IssueID7 507–508 Occurrence Handle10.1037/0003-066X.50.7.507
C. Starmer (2000) ArticleTitleDevelopments in non-expected utility theory: the hunt for a descriptive theory of choice under risk Journal of Economic Literature 38 IssueID2 332–382
J. Neumann Particlevon O. Morgenstern (1944) Theory of Games and Economic Behavior Princeton University Press Princeton, NJ
M.E. Yaari (1987) ArticleTitleThe dual theory of choice under risk Econometrica 55 IssueID1 95–115
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Beccacece, F., Cillo, A. Applying the Benchmarking Procedure: A Decision Criterion of Choice Under Risk. Theor Decis 61, 75–91 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-006-0005-0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-006-0005-0