Abstract
This paper defends cognitive neuroscience's project of developingmechanistic explanations of cognitive processes through decompositionand localization against objections raised by William Uttal inThe New Phrenology. The key issue between Uttal and researcherspursuing cognitive neuroscience is that Uttal bets against thepossibility of decomposing mental operations into component elementaryoperations which are localized in distinct brain regions. The paperargues that it is through advancing and revising what are likely tobe overly simplistic and incorrect decompositions that the goals ofcognitive neuroscience are likely to be achieved.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bechtel, W., 1994: Levels of description and explanaiton in cognitive science, Minds and Machines 4, 1–25.
Bechtel, W., 2001: Decomposing and localizing vision: An exemplar for cognitive neuroscience, in. W. Bechtel, P. Mandik, J. Mundale and R.S. Stufflebeam (eds), Philosophy and the Nurosciences: A Reader. Basil Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 225–249.
Bechtel, W., and McCauley, R.N., 1999: Heuristic identity theory (or back to the future): The mindbody problem against the background of research strategies in Cognitive Neuroscience, in M. Hahn and S. C. Stoness (eds), Proceedings of the 21st Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 67–72.
Bechtel, W., and Mundale, J., 1999: Multiple realizability revisited: Linking cognitive and neural states, Philosophy of Science 66, 175–207.
Bechtel, W., and Richardson, R.C., 1993: Discovering Complexity: Decomposition and Localization as Scientific Research Strategies, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
Fodor, J.A., 1975: The Language of Thought, Crowell, New York.
Gabrieli, J.D.E., Poldrack, R.A., and Desmond, J.E., 1998: The role of left prefrontal cortex in language and memory, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 95, 906–913.
Hubel, D.H., and Wiesel, T.N., 1962: Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex, Journal of Physiology (London) 160, 106–154.
Hubel, D.H., and Wiesel, T.N., 1968: Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex, Journal of Physiology (London) 195, 215–243.
Kim, J., 1964: Inference, explanation and prediction, Journal of Philosophy 61, 360–368.
Lycan, W.G., 1987: Consciousness, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Machamer, P., Darden, L., and Craver, C., 2000: Thinking about mechanisms, Philosophy of Science 67, 1–25.
McCauley, R.N., and Bechtel, W., 2001: Explanatory pluralism and heuristic identity theory, Theory and Psychology 11(6), 736–760.
Petersen, S.E., and Fiez, J.A., 1993: The processing of single words studied with positron emission tomography, Annual Review of Neuroscience 16, 509–530.
Petersen, S.E., Fox, P.T., Posner, M.I., Mintun, M., and Raichle, M.E., 1988: Positron emission tomographic studies of the cortical anatomy of single–word prodessing, Nature 331(18), 585–588.
Putnam, H., 1967: Psychological predicates, in W.H. Capitan and D.D. Merrill (eds), Art, Mind and Religion. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh.
Raichle, M.E., Fiez, J.A., Videen, T.O., MacLeod, M.–A. K., Pardo, J.V., Fox, P.T., and Peterson, S.E., 1994: Practice–related changes in human brain functional anatomy during nonmotor learning, Cerebral Cortex 4, 8–26.
van Essen, D.C., and Gallant, J.L., 1994: Neural mechanisms of form and motion processing in the primate visual system, Neuron 13, 1–10.
Van Orden, G.C., Pennington, B.F., and Stone, G.O., 2001: What do double dissociations prove? Inductive methods and isolable systems, Cognitive Science 25, 111–172.
Wimsatt, W.C., 1975: Reductionism, levels of organization, and the mind–body problem, in G. Globus, G. Maxwell and I. Savodnik (eds), Brain and Consciousness, Plenum, New York, pp. 205–267.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bechtel, W. Decomposing the Mind-Brain: A Long-Term Pursuit. Brain and Mind 3, 229–242 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019980423053
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019980423053