Skip to main content
Log in

Decomposing the Mind-Brain: A Long-Term Pursuit

  • Published:
Brain and Mind

Abstract

This paper defends cognitive neuroscience's project of developingmechanistic explanations of cognitive processes through decompositionand localization against objections raised by William Uttal inThe New Phrenology. The key issue between Uttal and researcherspursuing cognitive neuroscience is that Uttal bets against thepossibility of decomposing mental operations into component elementaryoperations which are localized in distinct brain regions. The paperargues that it is through advancing and revising what are likely tobe overly simplistic and incorrect decompositions that the goals ofcognitive neuroscience are likely to be achieved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bechtel, W., 1994: Levels of description and explanaiton in cognitive science, Minds and Machines 4, 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bechtel, W., 2001: Decomposing and localizing vision: An exemplar for cognitive neuroscience, in. W. Bechtel, P. Mandik, J. Mundale and R.S. Stufflebeam (eds), Philosophy and the Nurosciences: A Reader. Basil Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 225–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bechtel, W., and McCauley, R.N., 1999: Heuristic identity theory (or back to the future): The mindbody problem against the background of research strategies in Cognitive Neuroscience, in M. Hahn and S. C. Stoness (eds), Proceedings of the 21st Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 67–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bechtel, W., and Mundale, J., 1999: Multiple realizability revisited: Linking cognitive and neural states, Philosophy of Science 66, 175–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bechtel, W., and Richardson, R.C., 1993: Discovering Complexity: Decomposition and Localization as Scientific Research Strategies, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J.A., 1975: The Language of Thought, Crowell, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabrieli, J.D.E., Poldrack, R.A., and Desmond, J.E., 1998: The role of left prefrontal cortex in language and memory, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 95, 906–913.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubel, D.H., and Wiesel, T.N., 1962: Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex, Journal of Physiology (London) 160, 106–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubel, D.H., and Wiesel, T.N., 1968: Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex, Journal of Physiology (London) 195, 215–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J., 1964: Inference, explanation and prediction, Journal of Philosophy 61, 360–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lycan, W.G., 1987: Consciousness, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machamer, P., Darden, L., and Craver, C., 2000: Thinking about mechanisms, Philosophy of Science 67, 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCauley, R.N., and Bechtel, W., 2001: Explanatory pluralism and heuristic identity theory, Theory and Psychology 11(6), 736–760.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, S.E., and Fiez, J.A., 1993: The processing of single words studied with positron emission tomography, Annual Review of Neuroscience 16, 509–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, S.E., Fox, P.T., Posner, M.I., Mintun, M., and Raichle, M.E., 1988: Positron emission tomographic studies of the cortical anatomy of single–word prodessing, Nature 331(18), 585–588.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, H., 1967: Psychological predicates, in W.H. Capitan and D.D. Merrill (eds), Art, Mind and Religion. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raichle, M.E., Fiez, J.A., Videen, T.O., MacLeod, M.–A. K., Pardo, J.V., Fox, P.T., and Peterson, S.E., 1994: Practice–related changes in human brain functional anatomy during nonmotor learning, Cerebral Cortex 4, 8–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Essen, D.C., and Gallant, J.L., 1994: Neural mechanisms of form and motion processing in the primate visual system, Neuron 13, 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Orden, G.C., Pennington, B.F., and Stone, G.O., 2001: What do double dissociations prove? Inductive methods and isolable systems, Cognitive Science 25, 111–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimsatt, W.C., 1975: Reductionism, levels of organization, and the mind–body problem, in G. Globus, G. Maxwell and I. Savodnik (eds), Brain and Consciousness, Plenum, New York, pp. 205–267.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bechtel, W. Decomposing the Mind-Brain: A Long-Term Pursuit. Brain and Mind 3, 229–242 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019980423053

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019980423053

Navigation