Abstract
In this paper I discuss how Bohm's interpretation models spin measurements and how the two ways in which spin is a contextual property pertains to the Kochen-Specker theorem. I then present locality principles from which a Bell Inequality can be derived, and I identify which of the locality principles Bohm's interpretation violates at which times. I also present reasons why the spin vector should not be attributed to the Bohmian particles.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Albert, D. and B. Loewer: 1989, ‘Two No-Collapse Interpretations of Quantum Theory’, Noüs 23, 169–186.
Albert, D.: 1992, Quantum Mechanics and Experience, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Bell, J. S.: 1964, ‘On the Einstein—Podolsky—Rosen Paradox’, Journal of Physics 1, 195–200. Reprinted in Bell (1987) and Wheeler and Zurek (1983).
Bell, J. S.: 1982, ‘On the Impossible Pilot Wave’, Foundations of Physics 12, 989–999. Reprinted in Bell (1987).
Bell, J. S.: 1987, Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Bohm, D.: 1952, ‘A Suggested Interpretation of the Quantum Theory in Terms of ‘Hidden’ Variables: Parts I and II’, Physical Review 85, 166–193. Reprinted in Wheeler and Zurek (1983).
Bohm, D. and B. J. Hiley: 1993, The Undivided Universe: An Ontological Interpretation of Quantum Theory, Routledge, London.
Butterfield, J.: 1989, ‘A Space-Time Approach to the Bell Inequality’, in Cushing and McMullin (1989).
Butterfield, J.: 1992, ‘Bell's Theorem: What it Takes’, Brit. J. Phil. Sci. 43, 41–83.
Clauser, Horne, Shimony, and Holt: 1969, ‘Proposed Experiment to Test Local Hidden-Variable Theories’, Physical Review Letters 23, 880–84. Reprinted in Wheeler and Zurek.
Cushing, J. and E. McMullin (eds.): 1989, Philosophical Consequences of the Quantum Theory: Reflections on Bell's Theorem, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, Indiana.
Cushing, J.: 1994, Quantum Mechanics: Historical Contingency and the Copenhagen Hegemony, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Dewdney, Holland, and Kyprianidis: 1987, ‘A Causal Account of Non-Local Einstein—Podolsky—Rosen Spin Correlations’, Journal of Physics A 20, 4717–4732.
Dewdney, Holland, Kyprianidis, and Vigier: 1988, ‘Spin and Non-Locality in Quantum Mechanics’, Nature 336, 536–544.
Dürr, D., S. Goldstein, and N. Zanghi: 1992, ‘Quantum Equilibrium and the Origin of Absolute Uncertainty’, Journal of Statistical Physics 67, 843–907.
Greenberger, D., M. Horne, and A. Zeilinger: 1989, ‘Going Beyond Bell's Theorem’, in M. Kafatos (ed.), Bell's Theorem, Quantum Theory, and Conceptions of the Universe, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
Hooker, C. (ed.): 1975, The Logico-Algebraic Approach to Quantum Mechanics, Reidel, Dordrecht.
Jarrett, J. P.: 1984, ‘On the Physical Significance of the Locality Conditions in the Bell Arguments’, Noûs 18, 569–89.
Jones, M.: 1991, ‘Locality and Holism: The Metaphysics of Quantum Theory’, Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University.
Kochen, S. and E. P. Specker: 1967, ‘The Problem of Hidden Variables in Quantum Mechanics’, Journal of Mathematics and Mechanics 17, 59–87. Reprinted in Hooker (1975).
Pagonis, C. and R. Clifton: 1995, ‘Unremarkable Contextualism: Dispositions in the Bohm Theory’, Foundations of Physics 25, 281–296.
Redhead, M.: 1987, Incompleteness, Nonlocality, and Realism, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Reichenbach, H.: 1956, The Direction of Time, M. Reichenbach (ed.), University of California Press, Los Angeles.
Shimony, A.: 1986, ‘Events and Processes in the Quantum World’, in Penrose and Isham (eds.), Quantum Concepts in Space and Time, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Swift, A. R. and R. Wright: 1979, ‘Generalized Stern-Gerlach Experiments and the Observability of Arbitrary Spin Operators’, Journal of Mathematical Physics 21, 77–82.
Van Fraassen, B. C.: 1973, ‘Semantic Analysis of Quantum Logic’, in C. A. Hooker (ed.). Contemporary Research in the Foundations and Philosophy of Quantum Theory, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 80–113.
Van Fraassen, B. C.: 1982, ‘The Charybdis of Realism: Epistemological Implications of Bell's Inequality’, Synthese 5, 25–38. Reprinted with postscript in Cushing and McMullin (1989).
Van Fraassen, B. C.: 1991, Quantum Mechanics: An Empiricist View, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Vink, J.: 1993, ‘Quantum Mechanics in Terms of Discrete Beables’, Physical Review A 48, 1808–1818.
Wheeler and Zurek (eds.): 1983, Quantum Theory and Measurement, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bedard, K. Bohm, Spin, and the Bell Inequalities. Synthese 114, 405–444 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005097302191
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005097302191