Skip to main content
Log in

Business Ethics in Brazil and the U.S.: A Comparative Investigation

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this comparative survey of 126 Brazilian and U.S. business professionals, we explore the effect of national culture on ethical decision-making within the context of business. Using Reidenbach and Robin's (1988) multi-criteria ethics instrument, we examined how these two countries' differences on Hofstede's individualism/collectivism dimension are related to the manner in which business practitioners make ethical decisions. Our results indicate that Brazilians and Americans evaluate the ethical content of actions or decisions differently when applying utilitarian criteria. By contrast, business people from both countries do not differ significantly when they use egoistic criteria in evaluating the ethical nature of business decisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abratt, R., D. Nel and N. S. Higgs: 1992, ‘An Examination of the Ethical Beliefs of Managers Using Selected Scenarios in a Cross-Cultural Environment’, Journal of Business Ethics 11, 29–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adler, N.: 2002, International Dimensions of Organizational Behavior (Southwestern, Cincinnati, OH), pp. 182–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, C. S. and H. J. Becker: 1978, ‘The Use of Vignettes in Survey Research’, Public Opinion Quarterly 42, 93–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp, T. L. and N. E. Bowie (eds.): 1997, Ethical Theory and Business (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. R., L. W. Pant and D. J. Sharp: 1996, ‘A Methodological Note on Cross-cultural Accounting Ethics Research’, International Journal of Accounting 31, 55–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeGeorge, R. T.: 1993, Business Ethics (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubinsky, A. J. and W. Rudelius: 1980, ‘Ethical Beliefs: How Students Compare with Industrial Salespeople’, Proceedings of the American Marketing Association Educators Conference (Chicago, AMA), pp. 73–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Encyclopedia Britannica Online, ‘Brazil’, http:// search.eb.com (10/2/01).

  • Ferrell, O. C. and L. G. Gresham: 1985, ‘A Contingency Framework for Understanding Ethical Decision Making in Marketing’, Journal of Marketing 49, 87–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francesco, A. M. and B. A. Gold: 1998, International Organizational Behavior (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, R.: 1992, ‘A Multidimensional Scale for Measuring Business Ethics: A Purification and Refinement’, Journal of Business Ethics 11, 523–534.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, L. P.: 2000, ‘Technology and Ethics: Privacy in the Workplace’, Journal of the Center for Business Ethics at Bentley College 106(1), 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendry, J.: 1999, ‘Universality and Reciprocity in International Business Ethics’, Business Ethics Quarterly 9(3), 405–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, Geert: 1980, Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, Geert and M. H. Bond: 1988, ‘Confucius and Economic Growth: New Trends in Culture's Consequences’, Organizational Dynamics 16, 4–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, Geert: 1997, Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind (McGraw-Hill, New York, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, Geert: 2001, Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, S. D. and S. Vitell: 1992, ‘The General Theory of Marketing Ethics: A Retrospective and Revision’, in J. Quelch and C. Smith (eds.), Ethics in Marketing (Irwin, Chicago, IL).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, S. D., V. R. Wood and L. B. Chonko: 1989, ‘Corporate Ethical Values and Organizational Commitment in Marketing’, Journal of Marketing 53, 79–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husted, B. W.: 2000, ‘The Impact of National Culture on Software Privacy’, Journal of Business Ethics 26(3), 197–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerlinger, F. W.: 1986, Foundations of Behavioral Research, 3rd ed. (Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kluckhohn, C.: 1951, ‘The Study of Culture’, in D. Lerner and H. D. Lasswell (eds.), The Policy Sciences (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA), pp. 86–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kluckhohn, C.: 1962, ‘Universal Categories of Culture’, in S. Tax (ed.), Anthropology Today: Selections (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), pp. 304–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kluckhohn, F. R. and F. L. Strodtbeck: 1961, Variations in Value Orientations (Greenwood, Westport, CT).

    Google Scholar 

  • Neter, J., W. Wasserman and M. H. Kutner: 1985, Applied Linear Statistical Models, 2nd ed. (Irwin, Homewood, IL).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. C.: 1967, Psychometric Theory (McGraw-Hill, New York, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Reidenbach, R. E. and D. P. Robin: 1988, ‘Some Initial Steps towards Improving the Measurement of Ethical Evaluations of Marketing Activities’, Journal of Business Ethics 7, 871–879.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reidenbach, R. E. and D. P. Robin: 1990, ‘Toward the Development of A Multidimensional Scale for Improving Evaluations of Business Ethics’, Journal of Business Ethics 9, 639–653.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ronen, S. and O. Shenkar: 1985, ‘Clustering Countries on Attitudinal Dimensions: A Review and Synthesis’, Academy of Management Review 10(3), 435–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, S. C. and J. L. Barsoux: 1997, Managing Across Cultures (Prentice-Hall, New York, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, W. H.: 1999, Business Ethics (Wadsworth Publishing Company, Belmont, CA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrout, P. and J. Fleiss: 1979, ‘Intraclass Correlations: Uses in Assessing Rater Reliability’, Psychological Bulletin 86, 20–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Triandis, H. C. and D. P. S. Bhawuk: 1997, ‘Culture Theory and the Meaning of Relatedness’, in P. C. Earley and M. Erez (eds.), New Perspectives on International Industrial/Organizational Psychology (The New Lexington Press, San Francisco, CA), pp. 13–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsalikis, J. and O. Nwachukwu: 1991, ‘A Comparison of Nigerian to American Views of Bribery and Extortion in International Commerce’, Journal of Business Ethics 10, 85–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trompenaars, F.: 1993, Riding the Waves of Culture (The Economist Books, London, U.K.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitell, S. J., S. L. Nwachukwu and J. H. Barnes: 1993, ‘The Effects of Culture on Ethical Decision-Making: An Application of Hofstede's Typology’, Journal of Business Ethics 12, 753–760.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E.: 1979, The Social Psychology of Organizing (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Beekun, R.I., Stedham, Y. & Yamamura, J.H. Business Ethics in Brazil and the U.S.: A Comparative Investigation. Journal of Business Ethics 42, 267–279 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022200702149

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022200702149

Navigation