Abstract
In this comparative survey of 126 Brazilian and U.S. business professionals, we explore the effect of national culture on ethical decision-making within the context of business. Using Reidenbach and Robin's (1988) multi-criteria ethics instrument, we examined how these two countries' differences on Hofstede's individualism/collectivism dimension are related to the manner in which business practitioners make ethical decisions. Our results indicate that Brazilians and Americans evaluate the ethical content of actions or decisions differently when applying utilitarian criteria. By contrast, business people from both countries do not differ significantly when they use egoistic criteria in evaluating the ethical nature of business decisions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abratt, R., D. Nel and N. S. Higgs: 1992, ‘An Examination of the Ethical Beliefs of Managers Using Selected Scenarios in a Cross-Cultural Environment’, Journal of Business Ethics 11, 29–35.
Adler, N.: 2002, International Dimensions of Organizational Behavior (Southwestern, Cincinnati, OH), pp. 182–195.
Alexander, C. S. and H. J. Becker: 1978, ‘The Use of Vignettes in Survey Research’, Public Opinion Quarterly 42, 93–104.
Beauchamp, T. L. and N. E. Bowie (eds.): 1997, Ethical Theory and Business (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).
Cohen, J. R., L. W. Pant and D. J. Sharp: 1996, ‘A Methodological Note on Cross-cultural Accounting Ethics Research’, International Journal of Accounting 31, 55–66.
DeGeorge, R. T.: 1993, Business Ethics (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).
Dubinsky, A. J. and W. Rudelius: 1980, ‘Ethical Beliefs: How Students Compare with Industrial Salespeople’, Proceedings of the American Marketing Association Educators Conference (Chicago, AMA), pp. 73–76.
Encyclopedia Britannica Online, ‘Brazil’, http:// search.eb.com (10/2/01).
Ferrell, O. C. and L. G. Gresham: 1985, ‘A Contingency Framework for Understanding Ethical Decision Making in Marketing’, Journal of Marketing 49, 87–96.
Francesco, A. M. and B. A. Gold: 1998, International Organizational Behavior (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).
Hansen, R.: 1992, ‘A Multidimensional Scale for Measuring Business Ethics: A Purification and Refinement’, Journal of Business Ethics 11, 523–534.
Hartmann, L. P.: 2000, ‘Technology and Ethics: Privacy in the Workplace’, Journal of the Center for Business Ethics at Bentley College 106(1), 1–27.
Hendry, J.: 1999, ‘Universality and Reciprocity in International Business Ethics’, Business Ethics Quarterly 9(3), 405–420.
Hofstede, Geert: 1980, Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA).
Hofstede, Geert and M. H. Bond: 1988, ‘Confucius and Economic Growth: New Trends in Culture's Consequences’, Organizational Dynamics 16, 4–21.
Hofstede, Geert: 1997, Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind (McGraw-Hill, New York, NY).
Hofstede, Geert: 2001, Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).
Hunt, S. D. and S. Vitell: 1992, ‘The General Theory of Marketing Ethics: A Retrospective and Revision’, in J. Quelch and C. Smith (eds.), Ethics in Marketing (Irwin, Chicago, IL).
Hunt, S. D., V. R. Wood and L. B. Chonko: 1989, ‘Corporate Ethical Values and Organizational Commitment in Marketing’, Journal of Marketing 53, 79–90.
Husted, B. W.: 2000, ‘The Impact of National Culture on Software Privacy’, Journal of Business Ethics 26(3), 197–211.
Kerlinger, F. W.: 1986, Foundations of Behavioral Research, 3rd ed. (Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, NY).
Kluckhohn, C.: 1951, ‘The Study of Culture’, in D. Lerner and H. D. Lasswell (eds.), The Policy Sciences (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA), pp. 86–101.
Kluckhohn, C.: 1962, ‘Universal Categories of Culture’, in S. Tax (ed.), Anthropology Today: Selections (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), pp. 304–320.
Kluckhohn, F. R. and F. L. Strodtbeck: 1961, Variations in Value Orientations (Greenwood, Westport, CT).
Neter, J., W. Wasserman and M. H. Kutner: 1985, Applied Linear Statistical Models, 2nd ed. (Irwin, Homewood, IL).
Nunnally, J. C.: 1967, Psychometric Theory (McGraw-Hill, New York, NY).
Reidenbach, R. E. and D. P. Robin: 1988, ‘Some Initial Steps towards Improving the Measurement of Ethical Evaluations of Marketing Activities’, Journal of Business Ethics 7, 871–879.
Reidenbach, R. E. and D. P. Robin: 1990, ‘Toward the Development of A Multidimensional Scale for Improving Evaluations of Business Ethics’, Journal of Business Ethics 9, 639–653.
Ronen, S. and O. Shenkar: 1985, ‘Clustering Countries on Attitudinal Dimensions: A Review and Synthesis’, Academy of Management Review 10(3), 435–454.
Schneider, S. C. and J. L. Barsoux: 1997, Managing Across Cultures (Prentice-Hall, New York, NY).
Shaw, W. H.: 1999, Business Ethics (Wadsworth Publishing Company, Belmont, CA).
Shrout, P. and J. Fleiss: 1979, ‘Intraclass Correlations: Uses in Assessing Rater Reliability’, Psychological Bulletin 86, 20–28.
Triandis, H. C. and D. P. S. Bhawuk: 1997, ‘Culture Theory and the Meaning of Relatedness’, in P. C. Earley and M. Erez (eds.), New Perspectives on International Industrial/Organizational Psychology (The New Lexington Press, San Francisco, CA), pp. 13–52.
Tsalikis, J. and O. Nwachukwu: 1991, ‘A Comparison of Nigerian to American Views of Bribery and Extortion in International Commerce’, Journal of Business Ethics 10, 85–98.
Trompenaars, F.: 1993, Riding the Waves of Culture (The Economist Books, London, U.K.)
Vitell, S. J., S. L. Nwachukwu and J. H. Barnes: 1993, ‘The Effects of Culture on Ethical Decision-Making: An Application of Hofstede's Typology’, Journal of Business Ethics 12, 753–760.
Weick, K. E.: 1979, The Social Psychology of Organizing (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Beekun, R.I., Stedham, Y. & Yamamura, J.H. Business Ethics in Brazil and the U.S.: A Comparative Investigation. Journal of Business Ethics 42, 267–279 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022200702149
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022200702149