Abstract
Regulatory bodies tend to treat people’s emotional responses towards foods as a nuisance for rational opinion-formation and decision-making. This position is thought to be supported by such evidence as: (1) people showing negative emotional responses to the idea of eating meat products from vaccinated livestock; and (2) people showing positive emotional responses to Magnum’s “7 sins” marketing campaign. Such cases are thought to support the idea that regulatory communication about foods should abstract from people’s emotional perceptions and that corporate marketing of foods should show restraint in capitalizing upon these weaknesses of the heart. This paper, on the contrary, argues that people’s emotional perceptions of foods represent valuable sources of knowledge. This argument is developed by making the dominant reception of people’s emotions intelligible by tracing its roots through the history of the Platonic paradigm. Although this paradigm has dominated the philosophical and psychological debate about emotions, the idea that emotions are sources of knowledge has recently gained force. This paper also traces the historical roots of the alternative Aristotelian paradigm. The cases of meat products from vaccinated livestock and Magnum’s 7 sins serve to illustrate this controversy. The paper concludes by showing that a neo-Platonic emphasis on the irrationality of emotions does not contribute to a fruitful discussion about implications of people’s perceptions for agricultural and food politics, whereas a neo-Aristotelian account of rational emotions could enable regulatory bodies to engage people in a fruitful process of opinion-formation and decision-making about food production and consumption.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
A. Branthwaite T. Lunn (1985) Projective Techniques in Social and Market Research Gower Publishing Brookfield
H. Dagevos L. Sterrenberg (Eds) (2003) Burgers en consumenten. Tussen tweedeling en twee-eenheid [Citizens and Consumers. Between Dichotomy and Duality] Wageningen Academic Publishers Wageningen
R. Descartes (2003[1649]) ““The Passions of the Soul”” R. C. Solomon (Eds) What is an Emotion? Classic and Contemporary Readings EditionNumber2 Oxford University Press Oxford 21–30
J. Dewey (2003[1895]) “The Theory of Emotion” R. C. Solomon (Eds) What is an Emotion? Classic and Contemporary Readings EditionNumber2 Oxford University Press Oxford 85–97
D. Evans (2001) Emotion: The Science of Sentiment Oxford University Press Oxford
J. Ginneken Particlevan (2003) Collective Behavior and Public Opinion. Rapid Shifts in Opinion and Communication Erlbaum Mahwah, NJ
P. Griffiths (2003[1997]) “What Emotions Really Are” R. C. Solomon (Eds) What is an Emotion? Classic and Contemporary Readings EditionNumber2 Oxford University Press Oxford 284–290
D. Hume (2003[1739]) “A Treatise of Human Nature” R. C. Solomon (Eds) What is an Emotion? Classic and Contemporary Readings EditionNumber2 Oxford University Press Oxford 45–54
W. James (2003[1884]) “What is an Emotion?” R. C. Solomon (Eds) What is an Emotion? Classic and Contemporary Readings EditionNumber2 Oxford University Press Oxford 66–76
H. H. Kassarjian (1974) “Projective Methods” R. Ferber (Eds) Handbook of Marketing Research McGraw Hill New York 3–85
N. Klein (2000) No Logo Picador New York
D. Nijs F. Peters (2002) Imagineering. Het creëren van belevingswerelden [Imagineering. The Creation of Experiences] Boom Amsterdam
M. C. Nussbaum (2001) Upheavals of Thought. The Intelligence of Emotions Cambridge University Press Cambridge
M. C. Nussbaum (2003[1997]) “Emotions as Judgments of Value and Importance” R. C. Solomon (Eds) What is an Emotion? Classic and Contemporary Readings EditionNumber2 Oxford University Press Oxford 271–283
J. B. Pine J. H. Gilmore (1999) The Experience Economy. Work is Theatre and Every Business a Stage Harvard Business School Press Boston
J. P. Sartre (2003[1939]) “The Emotions: A Sketch of a Theory” R. C. Solomon (Eds) What is an Emotion? Classic and Contemporary Readings EditionNumber2 Oxford University Press Oxford 193–195
B. Schlackman (1989) “Projective Tests and Enabling Techniques for Use in Market Research” S. Robson A. Foster (Eds) Qualitative Research in Action Hodder & Stoughton London 59–76
D. A. Schön M. Rein (1995) Frame Reflection: Toward the Resolution of Intractable Policy Controversies Harper Collins New York
S. Sijtsema C. Wolf S. Kroon Particlevan der (2004) “Voedselbeelden: Een verkenning met behulp van projectieve technieken,'' [Images of Food: An Exploration Using Projective Methods” H. Dagevos (Eds) Voedselbeelden. Conceptuele en empirische verkenningen [Images of Food. Conceptual and Empirical Explorations] LEI The Hague 49–60
R. C. Solomon (Eds) (2003) What is an Emotion? Classic and Contemporary Readings EditionNumber2 Oxford University Press Oxford
B. Spinoza (2003[1677]) “Ethics” R. C. Solomon (Eds) What is an Emotion? Classic and Contemporary Readings EditionNumber2 Oxford University Press Oxford 32–43
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This paper has been written in the context of a research project “Images of Food” co-funded by the Dutch Ministry of Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality and the Social Sciences Group of Wageningen University and Research Centre. I would like to thank my colleagues Hans Dagevos, Sandra van der Kroon, Siet Sijtsema, Cor van der Weele (Wageningen University), and Cindy Wolff, as well as the members of the advisory board for this project, for the inspiring discussions about previous versions of this paper.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Beekman, V. Feeling Food: The Rationality of Perception. J Agric Environ Ethics 19, 301–312 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-005-6162-2
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-005-6162-2