Skip to main content
Log in

Tense and Truth Conditions

  • Published:
Philosophia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The B-theory of time holds that McTaggart’s A-series of past, present, and future is reducible to the B-series of events running from earlier to later. According to the date-theory—originally put forth by J.J.C. Smart and later endorsed by by D.H. Mellor—the truth conditions of tensed or Asentence-tokens can be given in terms of tenseless or B-sentences and, therefore, A-sentence-tokens do not ascribe any A-determinations of pastness, presentness, or futurity. However, as Nathan Oaklander has argued, the date-theory does not provide an adequate analysis of the ontological truth conditions of irreducible A-propositions. I show that the co-reporting theory—which holds that for every A-sentence-token there is a B-sentence that differs in sense but reports the same event or state of affairs—escapes the objections Oaklander has addressed against the date-theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The distinction between the A-series and B-series was first introduced in McTaggart (1908).

  2. See Smart (1980) and Mellor (1998).

  3. See Beer (1988) for an earlier formulation of the co-reporting theory and, for objections to the co-reporting theory, see Smith (1990) and Smith (1993), pp. 49–50.

  4. See Beer (2007a) and Beer (2007b) for a more elaborate discussion of this point.

References

  • Beer, M. (1988). Temporal indexicals and the passage of time. The Philosophical Quarterly, 38, 158–164. doi:10.2307/2219921.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beer, M. (2007a). A defense of the co-reporting theory of tensed and tenseless sentences. Philo, 10, 59–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer, M. (2007b). On the individual essences of moments of time. Philo, 10, 69–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • McTaggart, J. E. (1908). The unreality of time. Mind, 17, 457–474. doi:10.1093/mind/XVII.4.457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mellor, D. H. (1998). Real time II. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Oaklander, L. N. (2003). Two versions of the new B-theory of language. In A. Jokic & Q. Smith (Eds.), Time, Tense, and Reference (pp. 271–303). Cambridge: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smart, J. J. C. (1980). Time and Becoming. In P. Van Wagen (Ed.), Time and Cause. Boston: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Q. (1990). The co-reporting theory of tensed and tenseless sentences. The Philosophical Quarterly, 40, 213–222. doi:10.2307/2219812.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Q. (1993). Language and Time. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

An earlier version of the paper was read at the conference, “Time on Trial: One Hundred Years of McTaggart’s Argument against Time,” held at West Virginia University (April 2008). I would like to thank the participants at the conference, particularly Nathan Oaklander, Quentin Smith, Jonathan Tallant, and Michael Tooley, for their helpful comments. I am also very grateful for the excellent comments of an anonymous referee. Finally, I would like to thank my friend and mentor, Richard M. Gale, for the enlightening discussions we have had over the years.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michelle Beer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Beer, M. Tense and Truth Conditions. Philosophia 38, 265–269 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-009-9213-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-009-9213-5

Keywords

Navigation