Abstract
Male piglets in Belgium are still castrated unanesthetized in the first week of life, but animal rights organizations, supermarkets, and some consumers no longer accept this method in terms of animal welfare, and are pushing the pig industry to apply available alternative methods. This major change in pig husbandry will increase production costs without a guarantee for return of investment by consumers. Therefore, it is important to know the opinion of consumers on this matter. A questionnaire was used to collect data from 1,018 people through face to face interviewing in Flanders. A Chi-square test and Fisher’s exact test were used to analyze the data. Results show that in spite of several media campaigns of animal welfare organizations over the past few years, still half of the Flemish respondents were not aware of the problem of unanesthetized piglet castration. However, after being informed, the majority wanted unanesthetized castration to be banned. Although the concern about animal welfare implications was very high, the willingness to pay extra for alternatives was low.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anand, K. J. S. (1990). Neonatal responses to anesthesia and surgery. Clinical Perinatology, 17, 207–214.
Andrews, K., & Fitzgerald, M. (1994). The cutaneous withdrawal reflex in human neonates: Sensitization, receptive fields and the effects of contralateral stimulation. Pain, 51, 95–101.
Bonneau, M. (1998). Use of entire males for pig meat in the European Union. Meat Science, 49(1), 257–272.
De Tavernier, J., Lips, D., & Aerts, S. (2005). Dier en Welzijn. Tielt, Belgium: Terra-Lannoo nv.
Dijksterhuis, G. B., Engel, B., Walstra, P., Furnols, M. F. I., Agerhem, H., Fischer, K., et al. (2000). An international study on the importance of androstenone and skatole for boar taint: II. Sensory evaluation by trained panels in seven European countries. Meat Science, 54(3), 261–269.
European Commission. (2001). Commission Directive 2001/93/EC of 9 November 2001 amending Directive 91/630/EEC laying down minimum standards for the protection of pigs.
European Declaration on alternatives to surgical castration of pigs. (2011). http://ec.europa.eu/food/animal/welfare/farm/initiatives_en.htm.
European Food Safety Authority. (2004). Welfare aspects of the castration of piglets. The EFSA Journal, 91, 1–100.
Fitzgerald, M. (1994). Neurobiology of foetal and neonatal pain: Textbook of pain (3rd ed.). London: Churchill Livingstone.
Font i Furnols, M., Gispert, M., Guerrero, L., Velarde, A.,Tibau, J., Soler, J., & Hortós, M. (2008). Consumers’ sensory acceptability of pork from immunocastrated male pigs. Meat Science, 80, 1013–1018.
Font i Furnols, M., & Oliver, M. A. (1999). Production and consumption of pork meat with different levels of boar taint. Food Science and Technology International, 5, 367–375.
Frewer, L. J., Howard, C., Hedderley, D., & Shepherd, R. (1997). Consumer attitudes towards different food-processing technologies used in cheese production-the influence of consumer benefit. Food Quality and Preference, 8(4), 271–280.
Frewer, L. J., Kole, A., Van De Kroon, S. M. A., & De Lauwere, C. (2005). Consumer attitudes towards the development of animal-friendly husbandry systems. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 18, 345–367.
Harper, G., & Henson, S. (2001). Consumer Concerns About Animal Welfare and the Impact on Food Choice. EU FAIR CT98-3678 Final Report, pp. 38. http://europa.eu.int/comm/food/animal/welfare/eu_fair_project_en.pdf.
Hay, M., Vulin, A., Genin, S., Sales, P., & Prunier, A. (2003). Assessment of pain induced by castration in piglets: Behavioural and physiological responses over the subsequent 5 days. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 82, 201–218.
Hendriksen, C. F. M., & Boumans, I. J. M. M. (2006). Een rapport over de ontwikkelingen inen rondom het proefdiergebruik en alternatieven voor dierproeven. De proefdierbarometer. http://www.vet.uu.nl/nca/userfiles/other/Proefdierbarometer.pdf.
Henke, J., & Ehrhardt W. (2004). Anästhesie und Analgesie beim Klein- und Heimtier sowie bei Vögeln, Reptilien, Amphibien und Fischen. Schattauer Verlag, 369–405.
Huber-Eicher, B., & Spring, P. (2008). Attitudes of Swiss consumers towards meat from entire orimmunocastrated boars: A representative survey. Research in Veterinary Science, 85, 625–627.
Prunier, A., Bonneau, M., von Borell, E. H., Cinotti, S., Gunn, M., Fredriksen, B., et al. (2006). A review of the welfare consequences of surgical castration in piglets and the evaluation of non-surgical methods. Animal Welfare, 15, 277–289.
Taylor, A. A., Weary, D. M., Lessard, M., & Braithwaite, L. A. (2001). Behavioral responses of piglets to castration: the effect of pig age. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 73, 35–45.
Van Beirendonck, S., Driessen, B., Verbeke, G., & Geers, R. (2011). Behavior of piglets with or without carbon dioxide anesthesia. Journal of Animal Science, 89(10), 3310–3317.
Vanhonacker, F., Verbeke, W., & Tuyttens, F. (2009). Belgian consumers’ attitude towards surgical castration and immunocastration of piglets. Animal Welfare, 18, 371–380.
Verbeke, W. (2009). Stakeholder, citizen and consumer interests in farm animal welfare. Animal Welfare, 18, 325–333.
Verbeke, W., & Viaene, J. (1999). Beliefs, attitude and behaviour towards fresh meatconsumption in Belgium: Empirical evidence from a consumer survey. Food Quality and Preference, 10, 437–445.
Vermeir, I., & Verbeke, W. (2006). Sustainable food consumption: exploring the consumer “attitude-behavioral intention” gap. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 19, 169–194.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Ellen De Maeyer for helping with the practical accomplishment of the questionnaires and the anonymous reviewers of an earlier version of this paper for their helpful comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Van Beirendonck, S., Driessen, B. & Geers, R. Belgian Consumers’ Opinion on Pork Consumption Concerning Alternatives for Unanesthetized Piglet Castration. J Agric Environ Ethics 26, 259–272 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-012-9378-y
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-012-9378-y