Abstract
The relationship between mathematical formalism, physical interpretation and epistemological appraisal in the practice of physical theorizing is considered in the context of Bohmian mechanics. After laying outthe formal mathematical postulates of thetheory and recovering the historical roots ofthe present debate over the meaning of Bohmianmechanics from the early debate over themeaning of Schrödinger's wave mechanics,several contemporary interpretations of Bohmianmechanics in the literature are discussed andcritiqued with respect to the aim of causalexplanation and an alternative interpretationis proposed. Throughout, the over-arching aimis to exhibit the connections betweenmathematical, ontological and methodologicalquestions in physical theory and to reflect onthe rationality of physical theorizing in lightof the present case.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Albert, D.Z.: 1996, Elementary Quantum Metaphysics. In Cushing et al., 277–284.
Baublitz, M. and A. Shimony: 1996, Tension in Bohm's Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. In Cushing et al., 251–264.
Baym, G.: 1969, Lectures on Quantum Mechanics. New York: W.A. Benjamin.
Bell, J.S.: 1987, Speakable and Unspeakable in QuantumMechanics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Belousek, D.W.: 1996, Einstein's 1927 Unpublished Hidden-Variable Theory: Its Background, Context and Significance, Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 27: 437–461.
Belousek, D.W.: 1998, Falsification, the Duhem-Quine Thesis, and Scientific Realism: From a Phenomenological Point of View, Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 29: 145–161.
Belousek, D.W.: 1999, Bell's Theorem, Nonseparability and Spacetime Individuation in Quantum Mechanics, Philosophy of Science 66: S28–S46 (Proceedings).
Belousek, D.W.: 2000a, Statistics, Symmetry and the Conventionality of Indistinguishability in Quantum Mechanics, Foundations of Physics 30: 1–34.
Belousek, D.W.: 2000b, Statistics, Symmetry and (In)Distinguishability in Bohmian Mechanics, Foundations of Physics 30: 153–164.
Belousek, D.W.: 2000c, Interpretation and Ontology in Modern Physics, Metascience (November): 460–467.
Ben-Menahem, Y.: 1990, Equivalent Descriptions, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 41: 261–279.
Bohm, D.: 1952, A Suggested Interpretation of the Quantum Theory in Terms of “Hidden” Variables, I and II, Physical Review 85: 166–193.
Bohm, D.: 1953, Proof that Probability Density Approaches |ψ|2 in Causal Interpretation of the Quantum Theory, Physical Review 89: 458–466.
Bohm, D. and B.J. Hiley: 1993, The Undivided Universe: An Ontological Interpretation of Quantum Theory. London: Routledge.
Bohr, N.: 1985, CollectedWorks: Foundations of Quantum Physics I (1926–1932) (Vol. 6), in J. Kalckar (ed.). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Brown, H.R., A. Elby and B. Weingard: 1996, Cause and Effect in the Pilot-Wave Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. In Cushing et al., 309–319.
Bub, J.: 1997, Interpreting the Quantum World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cushing, J.T.: 1991, Quantum Theory and Explanatory Discourse: Endgame for Understanding? Philosophy of Science 58: 337–358.
Cushing, J.T.: 1994, Quantum Mechanics: Historical Contingency and the Copenhagen Hegemony. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Cushing, J.T., A. Fine and S. Goldstein (eds.): 1996, Bohmian Mechanics and Quantum Theory: An Appraisal. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Cushing, J.T. and E. McMullin (eds.): 1989, Philosophical Consequences of Quantum Theory: Reflections on Bell's Theorem. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
de Broglie, L.: 1927, La Mécanique ondulatoire et la structure atomique de la matière et du rayonment, Le Journal de Physique et Le Radium 8: 225–241. Reprinted in English translation in L. de Broglie and L. Brillouin: 1928, Selected Papers on Wave Mechanics. London: Blackie and Son, 113–138.
de Broglie, L.: 1960, Non-LinearWaveMechanics: A Causal Interpretation, trans. by A.J. Knodel and Jack C. Miller. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
de Broglie, L.: 1964, The Current Interpretation of Wave Mechanics: A Critical Study. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Dickson, M.: 1996, Antidote or Theory? Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 27: 229–238.
Dirac, P.A.M.: 1958, The Principles of Quantum Mechanics, 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dürr, D., S. Goldstein and N. Zanghi: 1992, Quantum Equilibrium and the Origin of Absolute Uncertainty, Journal of Statistical Physics 67: 843–907.
Dürr, D., S. Goldstein and N. Zanghi: 1995, Quantum Physics without Quantum Philosophy, Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 26: 137–149.
Dürr, D., S. Goldstein and N. Zanghi: 1996, Bohmian Mechanics as the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. In Cushing et al., 21–44.
Goldstein, S.: 1987, Stochastic Mechanics and Quantum Theory, Journal of Statistical Physics 47: 645–667.
Goldstein, S.: 1996, Review Essay: Bohmian Mechanics and The Quantum Revolution, Synthese 107: 145–165.
Heidegger, M.: 1985, History of the Concept of Time, trans. by T. Kisiel. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Holland, P.R.: 1993, The Quantum Theory of Motion: An Account of the de Broglie-Bohm Causal Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Holland, P.R.: 1996, Is QuantumMechanics Universal? In Cushing et al., 99–110.
Howard, D.: 1990, Nicht Sein Kann Was Nicht Sein Darf, or the Prehistory of EPR, 1909–1935: Einstein's Early Worries about the Quantum Mechanics of Composite Systems. In A.I. Miller (ed.), Sixty-Two Years of Uncertainty. New York: Plenum Press, 61–109.
Klein, M.J.: 1964, Einstein and the Wave-Particle Duality, The Natural Philosopher 3: 1–49.
Kuhn, T.S.: 1970, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kuhn, T.S.: 1977, Objectivity, Value Judgment, and Theory Choice. In The Essential Tension: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 320–339.
Lakatos, I.: 1978, The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Landé, A.: 1965, New Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. London: Cambridge University Press.
Landau, L.D. and E.M. Lifshitz: 1965, Quantum Mechanics, 2nd ed. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Laudan, L.: 1984, Science and Values. Berkeley: University of California.
MacIntyre, A.: 1984, After Virtue, 2nd ed. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
McMullin, E.: 1983, Values in Science, Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association 2: 3–28.
McMullin, E.: 1984, Two Ideals of Explanation in Natural Science. In P.A. French et al. (eds.), Midwest Studies in Philosophy of Science, Vol. IX: Causation and Causal Theories. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, 205–220.
McMullin, E.: 1988a, Goals of Natural Science. In I. Hronzsky et al. (eds.), Scientific Knowledge Socialized. Budapest: Akadéiai Kiadó, 27–58.
McMullin, E.: 1988b, The Shaping of Scientific Rationality: Construction and Constraint. In E. McMullin (ed.), Construction and Constraint: The Shaping of Scientific Rationality. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame, 1–47.
McMullin, E.: 1989, The Explanation of Distant Action: Historical Notes. In Cushing and McMullin, 272–302.
Nelson, E.: 1966, Derivation of the Schrödinger Equation from Newtonian Mechanics, Physical Review 150: 1079–1085.
Newton-Smith, W.H.: 1981, The Ratioinality of Science. London: Routledge and Keegan Paul.
Pais, A.: 1982, Subtle is the Lord...:The Science and Life of Albert Einstein. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
de la Peña-Auerbach, L. and L.S. Garcia-Colín: 1968, Possible Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, Journal of Mathematical Physics 9: 916–921.
Quine, W.V.O.: 1975, On Empirically Equivalent Systems of The World, Erkenntnis 9: 313–328.
Schrödinger, E.: 1926a, Quantisierung als Eigenwertproblem (Erste Mitteilung), Annalen der Physik 79: 361–376. Reprinted in English translation in Schrödinger: 1928, 1–12.
Schrödinger, E.: 1926b, Quantisierung als Eigenwertproblem (Zweite Mitteilung), Annalen der Physik 79: 489–527. Reprinted in English translation in Schrödinger: 1928, 13–40.
Schrödinger, E.: 1928, Collected Papers on Wave Mechanics. London: Blackie and Son.
Shapere, D.: 1980, The Character of Scientific Change. In T. Nickles (ed.), Scientific Discovery, Logic and Rationality. Dordrecht: Reidel, 61–116.
Shapere, D.: 1984, Objectivity, Rationality, and Scientific Change, Philosophy of Science Association 2: 637–663.
Valentini, A.: 1991, Signal Locality, Uncertainty, and the Subquantum HTheorem, I and II, Physics Letters A 156: 5–11 and 158: 1–8.
Valentini, A.: 1992, On the Pilot-Wave Theory of Classical, Quantum and Subquantum Physics. Ph.D. Dissertation, ISAS–International School for Advanced Studies, Trieste. To be published as On the Pilot-Wave Theory of Classical, Quantum and Subquantum Physics. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
Valentini, A.: 1996, Pilot-Wave Theory of Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology. In Cushing et al., 45–66.
Valentini, A.: 1997, On Galilean and Lorentz Invariance in Pilot-Wave Dynamics, Physics Letters A 228: 215–222.
von Neumann, J.: 1955, Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Wessels, L.: 1977, Schrödinger's Route to Wave Mechanics, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 10: 311–340.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Belousek, D.W. Formalism, Ontology and Methodology in Bohmian Mechanics. Foundations of Science 8, 109–172 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023925900377
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023925900377