Skip to main content
Log in

An axiomatic foundation of relativistic spacetime

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An ab-initio foundation for relativistic spacetime is given, which is a conservative extension of Zermelo’s set theory with urelemente. Primitive entities are worldlines rather than spacetime points. Spacetime points are sets of intersecting worldlines. By the proper axioms, they form a manifold. Entities known in differential geometry, up to a metric, are defined and have the usual properties. A set-realistic point of view is adopted. The intended ontology is a set-theoretical hierarchy with a broad base of the empty set and urelemente. Sets generated from the empty set are mathematically interpreted, all other sets are physically interpreted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andréka, H., Madarász, J. X., & Németi, I. (2004). Logical analysis of relativity theories. In: V. Hendricks et al. (Eds.), First-order logic revisited (pp. 7–36). Berlin: Logos Verlag.

  • Andréka, H., Madarász, J. X., & Németi, I. (2006). Logical axiomatizations of spacetime; samples from the literature. In A. Prékopa & E. Molnár (Eds.), Non-Euclidean geometries: János Bolyai Memorial Volume (pp. 155–185). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Andréka, H., Madarász, J. X., & Németi, I. (2007). Logic of space-time and relativity. In Handbook of spatial logics (pp. 607–711). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Andréka, H., Madarász, J. X., Németi, I., & Szekely, G. (2008). Axiomatizing relativistic dynamics without conservation postulates. Studia Logica, 89, 163–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andréka, H., Madarász, J. X., Németi, I., & Székely, G. (2012). A logic road from special relativity to general relativity. Synthese, 186, 633–649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ax, J. (1978). The elementary foundations of spacetime. Foundations of Physics, 8, 507–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benda, T. (2008). A formal construction of the spacetime manifold. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 37, 441–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehlers, J., Pirani, R. A. E., & Schild, A. (1972). The geometry of free fall and light propagation. In L. O. Raifeartaigh (Ed.), General relativity, papers in honour of J.L. Synge (pp. 63–84). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawking, S. W., King, A. R., & McCarthy, P. J. (1976). A new topology for curved space-time which incorporates the causal, differential, and conformal structures. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 17, 174–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovelock, D. (1972). The four-dimensionality of space and the Einstein tensor. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 13, 874–876.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madarász, J. X., Németi, I., & Töke, C. (2004). On generalizing the logic-approach to space-time towards general relativity: first steps. In V. Hendricks et al. (Eds.), First-order logic revisited (pp. 225–268). Berlin: Logos Verlag.

  • Madarász, J. X., Németi, I., & Szekely, G. (2006). Twin paradox and the logical foundation of relativity theory. Foundations of Physics, 36, 681–714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malament, D. (1977a). The class of continuous timelike curves determines the topology of spacetime. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 19, 1399–1404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malament, D. (1977b). Causal theories of time and the conventionality of simultaneity. Nous, 11, 293–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mundy, B. (1986). Optical axiomatization of Minkowski space–time geometry. Philosophy of Science, 53, 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Navarro, A., & Navarro, J. (2010). Lovelock’s theorem revisited. Journal of Geometrical Physics, 61, 1950–1956.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, B. (1983). Semi-Riemann geometry. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichenbach, H. (1924/1969). Axiomatization of the theory of relativity. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

  • Robb, A. A. (1936). Geometry of time and space. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Benda.

Appendix

Appendix

Zermelo’s set theory Z is extended to a set theory with urelemente ZU. We write

The usual extensionality axiom is modified to become

  • (SE)   

  •           “Any sets \(x\) and \(y\) that are not urelemente are identical if they contain the same elements.”

One axiom is added:

  • (SU)   

  •           “The urelemente form a set.”

This determines ZU. The language of ST contains an additional predicate constant \(\not \mid \). The elementary formula \(v\not \mid _{x}w\) is read “\(w\) intersects \(v\) at \(x\).” or “\(w\) intersects \(<v,x>\)”. In the following, the proper axioms of ST are given, along with several (nominal) definitions.

  • (P1)   )

  •        “\(w\) intersects \(v\) at \(x\) implies that \(v\) and \(w\) are worldlines and \(x\) is a real number.”

  •        “\(w\) intersects \(<v, x>\) implies that \(v\) and \(w\) are worldlines and \(x\) is a real number.”

  • (P2)   

  •        “Intersection of worldlines is irreflexive.”

We write as an abbreviation

  •          

  •          “\(v\) and \(w\) mutually intersect at \(x\) and \(y\).”

  • (P3)   

  •       “For any worldlines \(v, w\), and any real number \(x\), if \(w\) intersects \(v\) at \(x\), then one and only one real number \(y\) exists, such that \(v\) and \(w\) mutually intersect at \(x\) and \(y\).”

We write

\(\mathsf{Lea}_{vw}~xy\) for

      \(\mathsf{V}uab~((\mathsf{Isn}_vu xa \wedge \mathsf{Isn}_{wu} yb~\wedge a<b)\vee ~(\mathsf{Isn}_{vw} by\wedge x<b)\vee ~(\mathsf{Isn}_{vw}xa~\wedge a<y))\)

  •       “A worldline leads from \(v\) at \(x\) to \(w\) at \(y\).”

  •       “A worldline leads from \(x\) on \(v\) to \(y\) on \(w\).”

  • (P4)   

  •       “For any two worldlines \(v\), \(w\) and any real number \(x\), there is a real number \(y\), such that a worldline exists that leads from \(y\) on \(w\) to \(x\) on \(v\).”

  • (P5)   

  •       “For any two worldlines \(v\), \(w\) and any real number \(x\), with \(w\) not intersecting \(v\) at \(x\), two sets \(a\)\(b\) exist, such that no worldline intersecting \(w\) at \(a\) or \(b\) intersects \(v\) at \(x\).”

  • (P6)   

  •       “For any two worldlines \(v\), \(w\) and all real numbers \(x\), \(y\), such that \(v\) and \(w\) mutually intersect at \(x\) and \(y\), and all real numbers \(a\) that are smaller than \(x\) and all real numbers \(b\) that are greater than \(y\), a worldline exists which leads from \(a\) on \(v\) to \(b\) on \(w\).”

  • (P7)   

  •       “For any two worldlines \(v\), \(w\) and all real numbers \(x\), \(y\), such that \(v\) and \(w\) mutually intersect at \(x\) and \(y\), and all real numbers \(b\) that are greater than \(y\), there exist a real number \(a\) greater than \(x\) and a worldline which leads from \(a\) on \(v\) to \(b\) on \(w\).”

  • (P8)   

  •       “For any two worldlines \(v\), \(w\) and all real numbers \(x\), \(y\), such that \(v\) and \(w\) mutually intersect at \(x\) and \(y\), and all real numbers \(a\) that are smaller than \(x\), there exist a real number \(b\) smaller than \(y\) and a worldline which leads from \(a\) on \(v\) to \(b\) on \(w\).”

We write

  •       \(\mathsf{sou}_{wv}~x\) for  \(\{y~{\vert }~\mathsf{Lea}_{wv}~ yx)\}\)

  •       “the source on \(w\) of \(x\) on \(v\)”;

  •       tar \(_{wv}x\) for\(~\{y~\vert ~\mathsf{Lea}_{vw}~xy)\}\)

  •       “the target on \(w\) of \(x\) on \(v\)”;

  •       \(\mathsf{ina}_{wv}~x~\) for\(~\{y~{\vert }~y \in {\mathbb {R}}\wedge y\notin ~\mathsf{sou}_{wv}~x\wedge y\notin \mathsf{tar}_{wv}x)\}\)

  •       “the inaccessible section on \(w\) from \(x\) on \(v\)”;

  •       

  •       “\(f\) smoothly and monotonously maps any \(x\) on \(v\) to the infimum of the inaccessible section on \(w\) of \(x\) on \(v\).”

  •       dpb \(_{vwxs}~f\) for \(\iota y~(\mathsf{Smm}~f~\wedge ~\mathsf{Mia}~_{wv}~f~\wedge \)

  •       \(\wedge ~\mathsf{V}! g~(\mathsf{V}! h ~(\mathsf{Mia}~_{sv}~g~\wedge \mathsf{Mia}~_{sw}~h~\wedge ~y~=~\partial (h\circ f\circ g))^\prime (g^{-1\prime } x)))\)

  •       “The derivative of the backward coordinate function \(f\) from \(v\) to \(w\) at \(x\) that is parametrized by \(s\).”

  • (P9)   

  •             

  •             

  •             \(\wedge \, \mathsf{Mia}~_{tv}~f_{2} \rightarrow ~\mathsf{dpb}~_{wvxs}~f~\ne ~\mathsf{dpb}~_{wuys}~f_{1}~\wedge ~\mathsf{dpb}~_{wvxs}~f~\ne ~\mathsf{dpb}~_{tvxs}~f_{2}))\)

  •       “For any two worldlines \(v\), \(w\), if the source on \(w\) of \(x\) on \(v\) is nonempty, any backward coordinate function from \(v\) to \(w\) is a smooth and monotonous and, for all real numbers \(x\), \(y\), all backward coordinate functions \(f\) from \(v\) to \(w\), all worldlines \(u\) with which \(v\) mutually intersects at \(x\) and \(y\) and all worldlines \(t\) intersecting \(w\) at the value of \(x\) under \(f\), the first derivative of \(f\) at \(x\) parametrized by \(s\) differs both from the first derivative of the backward coordinate function from \(u\) to \(w\) at \(y\) parametrized by \(s\) and the first derivative of the backward coordinate function from \(v\) to \(t\) at \(x\) parametrized by \(s\).”

We write

Cwl \(_{vw}~ux\) for \(Wv~\wedge ~ Ww~\wedge v~\ne ~w\)

     \(\wedge ~\mathsf{V} z~(\mathsf{Lea}_{vu}~zx)~\wedge ~\mathsf{V} z~(\mathsf{Lea}_{uv}~xz)~\wedge ~\mathsf{V} z~(\mathsf{Lea}_{wu}~ zx)~\wedge ~\mathsf{V} z~(\mathsf{Lea}_{uw}~xz)\)

     \(\wedge \mathsf{V}~z_{1}z_{2}~(z_{1}~\ne ~z_{2}~\wedge ~\lnot \mathsf{Lea}_{vu}~z_{1}x~\wedge ~\lnot \mathsf{Lea}_{vu}~z_{2}x~\wedge ~\lnot \mathsf{Lea}_{uv}~xz_{1}~\wedge ~\lnot \mathsf{Lea}_{uv}~xz_{2}) \)

     \(\wedge ~\mathsf{V} z_{1}z_{2}~(z_{1}~\ne ~z_{2}~\wedge ~\lnot \mathsf{Lea}_{wu}~z_{1}x~\wedge ~\lnot \mathsf{Lea}_{wu}~z_{2}x~\wedge ~\lnot \mathsf{Lea}_{uw}~ xz_{1}~\wedge ~\lnot \mathsf{Lea}_{uw}~xz_{2})\)

     “\(v\) and \(w\) are coordinate worldlines of \(x\) on \(u\).”

  • (P10)    \(\qquad \qquad \qquad \qquad \qquad \qquad \qquad \qquad \qquad \qquad \quad \,\,\wedge ~\mathsf{ina}_{wu}~x~=~\mathsf{ina}_{wt}~y)))\) \(\qquad \qquad \qquad \qquad \qquad \qquad \qquad \qquad \qquad \qquad \quad \,\,\wedge ~\mathsf{ina}_{wu}~x~=~\mathsf{ina}_{wt}~y))\)))) \(\qquad \qquad \wedge ~t~\ne ~u~\wedge ~y~\ne ~x~\rightarrow ~\mathsf{ina}_{vu}~x~\ne ~\mathsf{ina}_{vt}~y~\wedge ~\mathsf{ina}_{wu}~x~\ne ~\mathsf{ina}_{wt}~y))\))

  •       “For all worldlines \(u\) and real numbers \(x\), there are worldlines \(v\), \(w\) and real numbers \(a\), \(b\), with \(v\) and \(w\) being coordinate worldlines of \(x\) on \(u\) and \(a\) being smaller than \(b\), such that, for all \(x_{1}\) in the inaccessible section on \(v\) of \(x\) on \(u\), there are \(y_{1}, y_{2}\) not contained in the inaccessible section on \(v\) of \(x\) on \(u\), with \(y_{1}\) being smaller than \(x_{1}\) and \(x_{1}\) being smaller than \(y_{2}\), such that the set of real numbers formed by augmenting the inaccessible section on \(v\) of \(x\) on \(u\) by the interval from any real number \(z_{2}\) between \(y_{1}\) and \(x_{1}\) to \(x_{1}\) and diminishing it by the interval from \(y_{1}\) to \(z_{2}\) is an inaccessible section on \(v\) of some real number \(y\) on some worldline \(t\), to which a worldline leads from \(a\) on \(u\) and from which a worldline leads to \(b\) on \(u\), where the inaccessible section on \(w\) of \(y\) on \(t\) is identical with the inaccessible section on \(w\) of \(x\) on \(u\), and such that the set of real numbers formed by augmenting the inaccessible section on \(v\) of \(x\) on \(u\) by the interval from \(x_{1}\) to any real number \(z_{2}\) between \(x_{1}\) and \(y_{2}\) and diminishing it by the interval from \(z_{2}\) to \(y_{2}\) is an inaccessible section on \(v\) of some real number \(y\) on some worldline \(t\), to which a worldline leads from \(a\) on \(u\) and from which a worldline leads to \(b\) on \(u\), where the inaccessible section on \(w\) of \(y\) on \(t\) is identical with the inaccessible section on \(w\) of \(x\) on \(u\) and, furthermore, such that the inaccessible sections on \(v\) and \(w\) of any real number \(y\) on any worldline \(t\) to which a worldline leads from \(a\) on \(u\) and from which a worldline leads to \(b\) on \(u\) differ from the inaccessible sections on \(v\) and \(w\) of \(x\) on \(u\), respectively.”

  • (P11)                                                   

  •       “For all worldlines \(u\) and all real numbers \(x\), there are two real numbers \(a\), \(b\), with \(a\) being smaller than \(b\), such that, for all worldlines \(v\) intersecting \(u\) at \(x\) or being identical with \(u\), there is precisely one set of worldlines \(z\) containing \(v\) whose elements all intersect some worldline \(w\) at some real number \(y\) to which a worldline leads from \(u\) at \(a\) and from which a worldline leads to \(u\) at \(b\) and where, for every worldline \(w\) and real number \(y\), such that a worldline leads from \(u\) at \(a\) to \(w\) at \(y\) and a worldline leads from \(w\) at \(y\) to \(u\) at \(b\), there is precise one element of \(z\), which intersects \(w\) at \(y\) or is identical with \(w\).”

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Benda, T. An axiomatic foundation of relativistic spacetime. Synthese 192, 2009–2024 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-013-0345-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-013-0345-6

Keywords

Navigation