Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

On the assessment of genetic technology: Reaching ethical judgments in the light of modern technology

  • Published:
Science and Engineering Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The “Model for Reaching Ethical Judgments in the context of Modern Technologies — the Case of Genetic Technology”, which is presented here, has arisen from the project “Ethical Criteria bearing upon Decisions taken in the field of Biotechnology”. This project has been pursued since 1991 in the Zentrum für interdisziplinäre Technikforschung (ZIT) of the Technical University of Darmstadt, with the purpose of examining decision-making in selected activities involving the production of transgenic plants that have a useful application. The model is the basis of an outline for interviews to investigate how far decisions concerning the development of such plants with genetic techniques take ethical criteria into account. It was necessary to design this new model because other models for reaching judgments of this kind were not conceptually suited for concrete application. This model represents a problem related approach and combines methodological with substantive typology. In this it differs from comparable models for reaching ethical judgments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References and notes

  1. Cp. Höffe, Otfried (ed.): (1992)Lexikon der Ethik. München, Beck. pp. 61–63, pp. 185–188.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cp. Pfürtner, Stefan H.; Lührmann, Dieter; Ritter, Adolf Martin: (1988)Ethik in der europäischen Geschichte I: Antike und Mittelalter. Stuttgart, Kohlhammer.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cp. Höffe, Otfried (ed.): (1992)Lexikon der Ethik. München, Beck, pp. 179–181.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cp. Bender, Wolfgang: (1988)Ethische Urteilsbildung. Stuttgart, Kohlhammer, Especially pp. 174–185.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cp. Popper, Karl: (1958)Die offene Gesellschaft und ihre Feinde II: Falsche Propheten. München, Franke, p. 276.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Büchting, Andreas: (1993) Die Chancen der Gentechnik für die Landwirtschaft nutzen. In:Zuckerindustrie, Band 118, pp. 165–168.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cp. Association of German Engineers: Technikbewertung. Begriffe und Grundlagen. VDI-Richtlinie 3780.

  8. Cp. Committee of Enquiry of the Tenth German Bundestag: Chancen und Risiken der Gentechnologie. Ed. Deutsche Bundestag, Referat Öffentlichkeitsarbeit. Bonn, 1987. The project, “Folgenabschätzung und Bewertung des Einsatzes herbizid resistent gemachter Kulturpflanzen in der Landwirtschaft” at the Berlin Science Centre (WZB) also proceeds from the technology-related approach. Cp. WZB-Mitteilungen 61/September 1993, p. 48 ff.

  9. Weizsäcker, Ernst Ulrich von: (1990) Die Gefahren des Erfolges. Was geschieht, wenn die Technik sich durchsetzt? In: Klingholz, Reiner (ed.):Die Welt nach Mass. Gentechnik — Geschichte, Chancen und Risiken. Reinbek bei Hamburg, Rowohlt, pp. 232–242. Especially p. 237.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cp. Spaemann, Robert: (1980) Technische Eingriffe in die Natur als Problem der politischen Ethik. In: Birnbacher, Dieter (ed.):Ökologie und Ethik. Stuttgart, Reclam, pp. 180–206.

    Google Scholar 

  11. A more subtle interpretation of the argument in its “slippery slope” version is given by Williams, Bernard: (1985) Which slopes are slippery?; in: Lockwood, Michael (ed.):Moral Dilemmas in Modern Medicine, Open University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cp. Beck, Ulrich: Die Modernisierung der Barbarei: Das Zeitalter der Eugenik, pp. 31–61. In: Gegengifte. Die organisierte Unverantwortlichkeit. Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hoffmann, Johannes: Gentechnik und Ethik, pp. 55–78, esp. p. 55ff. In: The same (ed.): Ethische Vernunft und technische Rationalität. Interdisziplinäre Studien. Frankfurt a.M., Verlag für Interkulturelle Kommunikation, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cp. Jonas, Hans: (1979)Das Prinzip Verantwortung. Versuch einer Ethik für die technologische Zivilisation. Frankfurt a.M., Insel, p. 36.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cp. Beck, Ulrich: (1993)Die Erfindung des Politischen. Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp. In this: Vom Umgang mit Ambivalenz: Das Modell des “runden Tisches”, pp. 189–193.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cp. Beck, Ulrich: (1986)Risikogesellschaft. Auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne. Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp. The same: (1993)Die Erfindung des Politischen. Zu einer Theorie reflexiver Modernisierung. Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Cp. Habermas, Jürgen: (1985) Die Neue Unübersichtlichkeit. Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, pp. 202ff.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cp. Beck, Ulrich: (1993)Die Erfindung des Politischen. Zu einer Theorie reflexiver Modernisierung. Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp; in this: Freiheit für die Technik!, pp. 180–188.

    Google Scholar 

  19. In a report of the FAO and the sugar industry they come to the conclusion that in 2000 we shall need one million barrels more sugar than now. Cp. Jahresbericht der Bundesforschungsanstalt für Landwirtschaft (FAL), Braunschweig, 1992, p. 111.

  20. Cp. Kant, Immanuel: Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten. In: Vol. 6, The Complete Works. Darmstadt, Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1983, p. 61.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Cp. Bender, Wolfgang: Preservation and development as central ideas for designing science and technology. In:Challenges. Science and peace in rapidly changing environment. Edited by Rainer Rilling, Hartwig Spitzer, Owen Green, Ferdinand Huchow, Gyula Bati. Schriftenreihe Wissenschaft und Frieden, No. 16, pp. 197–207.

  22. Cp. Bender, Wolfgang: (1988)Ethische Urteilsbildung. Stuttgart, Kohlhammer, pp. 15–22.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Cp. Wingert, Lutz: (1993)Gemeinsinn und Moral. Grundzüge einer intersubjektivischen Moralkonzeption. Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, pp. 179–208.

    Google Scholar 

  24. The Greek word “deon” means duty or obligation, and deontological is applied to an ethic that can call certain actions “good” and others “bad” without needing to take the consequences of these actions into account. On the other hand, an ethic is teleological (from the Greek word “telos” — goal, aim, success, result) when it makes the morality of an act dependent on its consequences. Kant’s categorical imperative is an example of deontological ethics. The classical form of teleological ethics was evolved by the English philosophers Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill in their utilitarian principle. These two modes of argument are related to one another. Cp. Habermas, Jürgen: Moral und Sittlichkeit. In: Merkur, Vol. 39 (1985), p.1044. Spaemann, Robert: Wer hat wofür Verantwortung? Zum Streit um deontologische und teleologische Ethik. In: Herder- Korrespondenz, Vol.36 (1982), pp. 345–350, pp. 404–408.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Cp. Association of German Engineers: Technikbewertung, Begriffe und Grundlagen. VDI-Richtlinie 3780, March 1991. VDI-Report 15: Technikbewertung — Begriffe und Grundlagen. Erläuterungen und Hinweise zur VDI-Richtlinie 3780, 1991; It is here that we must differentiate between “technical” and “non-technical” values. A value is described as “technical” when it immediately refers to technical products and processes. All the other values can be referred to as “non-technical” because they describe real or possible facts and actions concerning nature, individual and society. In their content these values are “non-technical”, but in their practical meaning they are not (page 28).

  26. Cp. VDI-Report 15, p. 29ff.:Guidelines of the Association of German Engineers.

  27. Cp. Korff, Wilhelm: (1992)Die Energiefrage. Entdeckung ihrer ethischen Dimension. Trier, Paulinus.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Cp. Langenheder, Werner: (1991) Konzepte sozialorientierter Technikgestaltung. In:GI-FB 8. Rundbrief, No. 1, January 1991, pp. 35–42.

  29. Fox, Jeffrey: Do transgenic crops pose ecological risks? In:Bio/Technology, Vol. 12, February 1994, pp. 127–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Greene, Allison: (1994) Recombination between viral RNA and transgenic plant transcripts. In:Science, Vol. 263, p. 1423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Hoyle, Russ: (1994) A quixotic assault on transgenic plants — commentary on the environment. In:Bio/Technology, Vol. 12, pp. 236–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Jonas, Hans: (1979)Das Prinzip Verantwortung. Versuch einer Ethik für die technologische Zivilisation. Frankfurt a.M., Insel, p. 62.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Spaemann, Robert: (1980) Technische Eingriffe in die Natur als Problem der politischen Ethik. In: Birnbacher, Dieter (ed.):Ökologie und Ethik. Stuttgart, Reclam, pp. 180–206.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Birnbacher, Dieter: Sind wir für die Natur verantwortlich? In: Birnbacher, Dieter (eded.):Ökologie und Ethik. Stuttgart, Reclam, pp. 103–139.

  35. Cp. Korff, Wilhelm: (1992)Die Energiefrage. Entdeckung ihrer ethischen Dimension. Trier, Paulinus, p. 25.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Cp. Bonss, Wolfgang: (1991) Ungewissheit als soziologisches Problem oder Was heisst “kritische” Risikoforschung? In:Mittelweg 36, No. 1/93, pp. 15–34. Luhman, Niklas: Soziologie des Risikos. Berlin, New York, de Gruyter, pp. 9–40.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Jonas, Hans: (1979)Das Prinzip Verantwortung. Versuch einer Ethik für die technologische Zivilisation. Frankfurt a.M., Insel, pp. 76–83.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Technische Hochschule Darmstadt, Zentrum für interdisziplinäre Technikforschung (ZIT), Hochschulstrasse 1, 64289, Darmstadt, Germany

    Wolfgang Bender, Katrin Platzer & Kristina Sinemus

Authors
  1. Wolfgang Bender
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Katrin Platzer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kristina Sinemus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bender, W., Platzer, K. & Sinemus, K. On the assessment of genetic technology: Reaching ethical judgments in the light of modern technology. Sci Eng Ethics 1, 21–32 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02628695

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02628695

Keywords

Search

Navigation