Abstract
In education there is a concern that science teachers misrepresent the nature of science to students. An assumption that is implicit in this concern is that science teachers should be teaching the philosophy of science as it is understood by philosophers. This paper argues that both philosophers and science teachers misrepresent science when they engage in their respective disciplines, and it is evident the two misrepresentations are of different types. In philosophy, the misrepresentation is of a philosophical-epistemological nature where advocates of particular views maintain that advocates of other views misinterpret the nature of science. In education, the misrepresentation is of a cognitive, teaching nature where teachers' practical interpretations are not congruent with philosophers' interpretations of science. The discrepancy that exists between the two misrepresentations is due to the intentions of the two disciplines, and assuming that science teachers should teach a philosophically coherent interpretation of the nature of science is an over-simplification of the problem. The concepts of espoused theories and theories-in-use are used to link the two interpretations of science and provide suggestions for future research that may help clarify misrepresentations of science in science education.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Benson, G.: 1986, ‘An Analysis of Biology Teachers’ Philosophical Conceptions of Biology and Biological Knowledge', paper presented at the Annual Meeting of CSSE, Winnipeg, June 1–4, 1986.
Bhaskar, R.: 1986,Scientific Realism and Human Emancipation, Verso, London.
Dorin, H.: 1982,Chemistry: The Study of Matter, Cebco Standard Publishing, Fairfield, New Jersey.
Eger, M.: 1987, ‘Philosophy of Science in Science Education’, in J. Novak (ed.),Proceedings of the Second International Seminar, Misconceptions and Educational Strategies in Science and Mathematics, July 26–29, 1987. Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, pp. 163–76.
Eisner, E.: 1979,The Educational Imagination, Macmillan, New York.
Eisner, E.: 1983, ‘The Art and Craft of Teaching’,Educational Leadership, January.
Elkana, Y.: 1974,The Discovery of the Conservation of Energy, Hutchinson, London.
Feyerabend, P.: 1981,Problems of Empiricism, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Finley, F.: 1983, ‘Science Processes’,Journal of Research in Science Teaching 20: 47–54.
Gordon, D.: 1984, ‘The Image of Science, Technological Consciousness, and the Hidden Curriculum’,Curriculum Inquiry 14, 367–400.
Harre, R.: 1985,The Philosophies of Science, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Lakatos, I.: 1970, ‘Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes’, in I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave (eds.),Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 91–196.
Nadeau, R. and J. Desautels: 1984,Epistemology and the Teaching of Science, Science Council of Canada, Ottawa.
Novak, J. D.: 1983, ‘Can Metalearning and Metaknowledge Strategies to Help Students Learn How to Learn Serve as a Basis for Overcoming Misconceptions?’, in H. Helm and J. D. Novak (eds.),Misconceptions in Science and Mathematics, Proceedings of the International Seminar, June 20–22, 1983, Cornell University, Itacha, New York.
Novak, J. D.: 1987,Proceedings of the Second International Seminar, Misconceptions and Educational Strategies in Science and Mathematics, July 26–29, 1987, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.
Posner, G., K. Strike, P. Hewson and W. Gertzog: 1982, ‘Accommodation of a Scientific Conception: Toward a Theory of Conceptual Change’,Science Education 66, 211–27.
Roberts, D.: 1982, ‘Developing the Concept of “Curriculum Emphases” in Science Education’,Science Education 60, 243–60.
Schon, D.: 1987,Educating the Reflective Practitioner, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
Schwab, J.: 1964, ‘Structure of the Disciplines: Meaning and Significances’, in G. W. Ford and L. Pugno (eds.),The Structure of Knowledge and the Curriculum, Rand McNally, Chicago.
Smallwood, W. and P. Alexander: 1984,Biology, Silver Burdett, Glenview, Illinois.
Wade, N.: 1977, ‘Thomas S. Kuhn: Revolutionary Theorist of Science’,Science 197, 143–45.
Waterman, M.: 1982, ‘College Biology Students' Beliefs about Scientific Knowledge: Foundation for Study of Epistemological Commitments in Conceptual Change’, unpublished doctoral dissertation, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Benson, G.D. The misrepresentation of science by philosophers and teachers of science. Synthese 80, 107–119 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00869950
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00869950