This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Robert W. Benson, “The Semiotic Web of the Law”, in Roberta Kevelson (ed.),Law and Semiotics, Vol. 1 (New York and London: Plenum Press, 1987), 35–63;idem, “How Judges Fool Themselves: The Semiotics of the Easy Case”, in Roberta Kevelson (ed.),Law and Semiotics, Vol. 2 (New York and London: Plenum Press, 1988), 31–60.
Benson,supra n.1, “Semiotic Web”;idem, “Semiotics, Modernism and the Law”,Semiotica 73/1–2 (1989), 157–173; Joan C. Williams, “Critical Legal Studies: The Death of Transcendence and the Rise of the New Langdells”,New York University Law Review 62(3), (1987), 429–496.
John Deely, “Pars pro Toto”, in John Deely (ed.),Frontiers in Semiotics (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1986), vii-xxii.
Peter Goodrich,Legal Discourse (New York: St. Martin's Press, 1987); Benson,supra n.1,Semiotica; but see Bernard S. Jackson,Semiotics and Legal Theory (London, etc.: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1985).
Ludgiw Wittgenstein,Philosophical Investigations, trans. by G. E. M. Anscombe (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1958, 2nd ed.).
Stanley Fish,Is There a Text in This Class? (Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1980).
See Drucilla Cornell, “‘Convention’ and Critique”,Cardozo Law Review 7 (1986), 679–691; Williams,supra n.2.
The Interpretation of Cultures (New York: Basic Books, 1973);idem, Local Knowledge (New York: Basic Books, 1983).
Supra n.1 (1988).
Italo Calvino,Mr. Palomar, trans. by W. Weaver (San Diego, New York, London: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1985).
A Theory of Semiotics (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1979);The Role of the Reader (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1979);Semiotics and the Philosophy of Language (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1984).
Robert W. Benson, “Peirce and Critical Legal Studies:”, in Roberta Kevelson (ed.),Peirce and Law (Dordrecht and Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishing, 1990), forthcoming.
Thomas A. Sebeok, “The Semiotic Web: A Chronicle of Prejudices”,Bulletin of Literary Semiotics 2 (1975), 1–63.
Peter Goodrich,Reading the Law (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1986).
United States Department of State, Office of Legal Adviser (1987):The ABM Treaty, Part I: Treaty Language and Negotiating History; Part II: Ratification Process; Part III: Subsequent Practice; Sam Nunn, “Interpretation of the ABM Treaty”, Part One: “The Senate Ratification Proceedings”,Congressional Record, March 11, 1987, S2967–S2986; Part Two: “Subsequent Practice Under the ABM Treaty”,Congressional Record, March 12, 1987, S3090–S3095; Part Three: “The ABM Negotiating Record”,Congressional Record, March 13, 1987, S3171–S3173; Part Four: “An Examination of Judge Sofaer's Analysis of the Negotiating Record”,Congressional Record, May 20, 1987, S6808–6831.
Supra n.14.
Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties,done May 23, 1969, United States Senate Exec. Law 92d Congress, 1st Session (1971).
American Law Institute,Restatement of Foreign Relations Law of the United States (Revised) (Tentative Final Draft), 1985.
Robert C. Toth, “U.S. Aides Confident SDI Won't Block Treaty”,Los Angeles Times, March 24, 1988, I, 11; John Marks, “Taiwanization” of SDI Allows the Dialogue to Continue”,Los Angeles Times, December 20, 1987, V, 5.
Michael Wines, “Tentative Afghan Pact is Reached”,Los Angeles Times, April 1, 1988, I, 1.
Primo Levi, “Beyond Judgment”,The New York Review of Books 34(20), December 17, 1987, 10–14, at 14.
From João Cabral de Melo Neto, “O Cão Sem Plumas” inPoesias Completas (1945–1965). Rio de Janeiro: Editôra Sabià, 1968.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Loyola Law School, 1441 West Olympic Blvd, Los Angeles, CA 90015, U.S.A. My thanks to Jacqueline Grunfeld for valuable research assistance.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Benson, R.W. The semiotics of international law: Interpretation of the abm treaty. Int J Semiot Law 2, 257–276 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02047489
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02047489