Skip to main content
Log in

What is dialectical logic?

  • Published:
Erkenntnis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Anderson, A. R. and Belnap, N. D.: 1975, Entailment. The Logic of Relevance and Necessity. (Princeton University Press, Princeton).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ashby, W. R.: 197611, An Introduction to Cybernetics (Methuen, London).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Barth, E. M.: 1970, ‘Enten-Eller. De Logica van Licht en Donker’, Algemeen Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Wijsbegeerte 62, 217–240.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Benthem, J. F. A. K.van, 1978, ‘Four Paradoxes’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 7, 49–72.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bocheński, I. M., 1956, Formale Logik (Karl Alber Verlag, Freiburg and München).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bocheński, J. M. and Blakeley, T. J. (eds.), 1961, Studies in Soviet Thought, volume I (Reidel, Dordrecht).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Costa, N. C. A.da, 1974, ‘On the Theory of Inconsistent Formal Systems’, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 15, 497–510.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Haack, S., 1974, Deviant Logics (Cambridge University Press, London).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hamblin, C. L., 1970, Fallacies (Methuen, London).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Klaus, G., 1959, Einführung in die moderne Logik (Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften, Berlin).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kripke, S., 1975, ‘Outline of a Theory of Truth’, Journal of Philosophy 72, 690–716.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Krohn, W., 1972, Die formale Logik in Hegel's ‘Wissenschaft der Logik’ (Carl Hanser Verlag, München).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lakatos, I., 1976, Proofs and Refutations (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lobkowicz, N., (ed.), 1959, Das Widerspruchsprinzip in der neueren sowjetischen Philosophie (Reidel, Dordrecht).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Prawitz, D., 1965, Natural Deduction (Almqvist and Wiksell, Stockholm).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Quine, W. V. O. 1963, third printing, ‘Two dogmas of Empiricism’, in: From a logical point of view (Harper and Row, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Quine, W. V. O. and Ullian, J. S., 1970, The Web of Belief (Random House, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Routley, R., 1979, ‘Dialectical Logic, Semantics and Metamathematics’, Erkenntnis 14, 301–331.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Routley, R., and Meyer, R. K., 1976, ‘Dialectical Logic, Classical Logic, and the Consistency of the World’, Studies in Soviet Thought 16, 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Staal, F., 1975, Exploring Mysticism (Penguin Books, Harmondsworth).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Szábo, A. A., 1969, Anfänge der griechischen Mathematik (Oldenbourg, München).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Tarski, A., 1956, Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics (Oxford University Press, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Weinberger, O., 1965, ‘Der Relativizierungsgrundsatz und der Reduktionsgrundsatz, zwei Prinzipien des dialektischen Denkens’, Nakladatelství Československé Akademie Věd, Praha.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van Benthem, J.F.A.K. What is dialectical logic?. Erkenntnis 14, 333–347 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00174898

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00174898

Keywords

Navigation