Skip to main content
Log in

Antonyms and Paradoxes

  • Published:
Argumentation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Adjectives can be gradable or non-gradable and this aspect of their meaning is responsible for their different distribution and also for their classification into two different classes of antonyms. Non-gradable antonyms are called contradictories: they are neither true nor false together and exclude any middle term; gradable antonyms are called contraries: they are not simultaneously true, but may be simultaneously false. While with contraries a negative disjunction (neque...neque) can define an intermediate level, with contradictories it simply means that either term of the disjunction is excluded. There are however some Latin examples, such as neque vivus neque mortuus (`neither alive nor dead'), where the negation of a contradictory pair is used to convey a third, intermediate value. This third possibility is precisely what gives place to a paradox. Such an intermediate level can be defined also by terms like semivivus, semianimis (`half-dead'). Following Ducrot's theory on argumentation, such terms represent an argumentative attenuation, not with respect to life, rather with respect to death. With contradictories, in fact, the use of semi-, like the use of negation, gives the assertion of the opposite term as a result.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Anscombre, J.-C. and O. Ducrot: 1983, L'argumentation dans la langue, Mardaga, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertocchi, A.: 2002, ‘Scalarity and Concession: The Case of quamvis’, in L. Sawicki and D. Shalev (eds.), Donum grammaticum. Studies in Latin and Celtic Linguistics in Honour of Hannah Rosén, Peeters, Leuven, pp. 39-50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertocchi, A., M. Maraldi and A. Orlandini (eds.): 2001, Papers on Grammar VII, CLUEB, Bologna.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolinger, D.: 1972, Degree Words, Mouton, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fruyt, M.: 2001, ‘Morphologie et argumentation en latin’, in A. Bertocchi, M. Maraldi and A. Orlandini (eds), pp. 61-85.

  • Hamann, C.: 1991, ‘Adjectives’, in A. von Stechow and D. Wunderlich (eds.), Semantik: Ein internationales Handbuch der zeitgenössischen Forschung, de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 657-673.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, M. E.: 1987, Negatio contrarii. A Study of Latin Litotes, van Gorcum, Assen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, C.: 1999, Projecting the Adjective: The Syntax and Semantics of Gradability and Comparison, Garland Publishing, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, J.: 1977, Semantics, C.U.P., Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malkiel, Y.: 1959, ‘Studies in Irreversible Binomials’, Lingua 8, 113-160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittwoch, A.: 1991, ‘In Defence of Vendler's Achievements’, in C. Vetters and W. Vandeweghe (eds.), Perspectives on Aspect and Aktionsart, Belgian Journal of Linguistics 6, 71-85.

  • Muschitiello, N. (ed.): 2000, Aelia Laelia. Il mistero della Pietra di Bologna, Il Mulino, Bologna.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlandini, A.: 2001a, ‘Paradoxes sémantiques et argumentation’, in A. Bertocchi, M. Maraldi and A. Orlandini (eds.), pp. 133-146.

  • Orlandini, A.: 2001b, ‘Nec, neque ou de la disjonction’, in C. Moussy (ed.), De lingua latina nouae quaestiones, Peeters, Louvain, pp. 525-537.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rusiecki, J.: 1985, Adjectives and Comparison in English. A Semantic Study, Longman, London, New-York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Overbeke, M.: 1975, ‘Antonymie et gradation’, La linguistique 11, 135-154.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bertocchi, A. Antonyms and Paradoxes. Argumentation 17, 113–122 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022956009881

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022956009881

Navigation