Abstract
On the occasion of the commemoration of the hundredth anniversary of Husserl’s birth, Merleau-Ponty wrote:
Establishing a tradition means forgetting its origins, the aging Husserl used to say. Precisely because we owe so much to tradition, we are in no position to see just what belongs to it. With regard to a philosopher whose venture has awakened so many echoes, and at such an apparent distance from the point where he himself stood, any commemoration is also a betrayal — whether we do him the highly superfluous homage of our thoughts, as if we sought to gain them a wholly unmerited warrant, or whether on the contrary, with a respect that is not lacking in distance, we reduce him too strictly to what he himself desired and said.’
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
M. Merleau-Ponty, “The Philosopher and His Shadow,” in Signs, trans. R. C. McCleary (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1964), p. 159.
M. Merleau-Ponty, Phenomenology of Perception, trans. C. Smith (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1962). All page references in the text itself refer to this translation which we occasionally modify.
M. Merleau-Ponty, The Visible and the Invisible, trans. A. Lingis (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1968).
M. Henry, Phénoménologie matérielle (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1990), p. 5: “Qu’apporte de véritablement nouveau par rapport à Husserl, Heidegger ou Scheler, et cela en dépit de son immense talent, un penseur comme Merleau-Ponty?”.
M. Merleau-Ponty, The Visible and the Invisible, p. 200; cf. also p. 183.
M. Merleau-Ponty, Themes from the Lectures (1952–1960), trans. J. O’Neill (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1970), pp. 64–65.
M. Merleau-Ponty, Signs, p. 178.
M. Merleau-Ponty, Phenomenology of Perception, p. 151.
M. Merleau-Ponty, Phenomenology of Perception, p. 68.
W. Benjamin, “Some Motives in Baudelaire” (1939) in Charles Baudelaire: A Lyric Poet in the Era of High Capitalism, trans. H. Zohn (London: New Left Books, 1973).
M. Merleau-Ponty, Phenomenology of Perception, p. 330.
M. Merleau-Ponty, Signs, p. 172.
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1993 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bernet, R. (1993). The Subject in Nature: Reflections on Merleau-Ponty’s Phenomenology of Perception . In: Burke, P., van der Veken, J. (eds) Merleau-Ponty in Contemporary Perspective. Phaenomenologica, vol 129. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1751-7_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1751-7_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-4768-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-1751-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive