Skip to main content
Log in

Troubles with neo-notionalism

  • Published:
Philosophia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Almog, Joseph, John Perry, and Howard Wettstein.Themes from Kaplan. New York and Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barwise, Jon, and John Perry.Situations and Attitudes. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, Jonathan. “The Pragmatics of Substitutivity,”Linguistics and Philosophy, 11 (1988), 355–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —, “Wittgenstein, Searle, and the Background of Meaning,”Wittgenstein: Towards a Re-evaluation. Ed. R. Haller and J. Brandl. Vienna: Holder-Pichler-Tempsky, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnap, Rudolf.Foundations of Logic, and Mathematics. Chicago and London: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1955. (=International Encyclopedia of Unified Science, Vol 1, No. 3, 1939).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, Peter.Radical Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crimmins, Mark and John Perry. “The Prince and the Phone Booth: Reporting Puzzling Beliefs.”Journal of Philosophy, 86 (1989), 685–711.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frege, Gottlob. “The Thought: A Logical Inquiry.” Trans. A.M. and Marcelle Quinton.Mind, 65 (1956), 289–311. Rpt. inPhilosophical Logic. Ed. P. F. Strawson. London: Oxford Univ. Press, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacker, P.M.S.Wittgenstein: Meaning and Mind. Oxford and Cambridge: Blackwell, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haugeland, John. “Representational Genera.”Philosophy and Connectionist Theory. Ed. W. Ramsey, D. Rumelhart, and S. Stich, Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kvart, Igal. “Beliefs and Believing.”Theoria, 52 (1986), 129–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, Ruth Barcan. “A Proposed Solution to a Puzzle About Belief.”Midwest Studies in Philosophy, Vol 6. Ed. P. A. French, T. E. Uehling, Jr., and H. K. Wettstein. Minneapolis: Univ. of Minnesota Press, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. “Rationality and Believing the Impossible.”Journal of Philosophy, 80 (1983), 321–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, John. “Cognitive Significance and New Theories of Reference.”Nous, 22 (1988), 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • — “Thought Without Representation.”Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplement, 60 (1986), 137–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W.V. “Quantifiers and Propositional Attitudes.”Journal of Philosophy, 53 (1956). Rpt. inThe Ways of Paradox and Other Essays., Cambridge and London: Harvard Univ. Press, 1976, pp. 185–196.

  • Russell, Bertrand.Introduction to Mathematical Philosophy. London: Allen and Unwin, 1919.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, Nathan.Frege’s Puzzle. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, John. “The Background of Meaning.”Speech Act Theory and Pragmatics. Ed. Searle et al.

  • — Ferenc Kiefer and Manfred Bierwisch, eds.Speech Act Theory and Pragmatics, Dordrecht: Reidel, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wettstein, Howard. “Cognitive Significance Without Cognitive Content.”Mind, 97 (1988), 1–28. Rpt. inThemes from Kaplan. Ed. Almog et al.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. “Has Semantics Rested on a Mistake?”Journal of Philosophy, 83 (1986), 185–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, Ludwig.Philosophical Investigations. 3rd ed. Trans. G.E.M. Anscombe. New York: Macmillan, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Berg, J. Troubles with neo-notionalism. Philosophia 27, 459–481 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02383190

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02383190

Navigation