Skip to main content
Log in

‘Nobody Loves Me’: Quantification and Context

  • Published:
Philosophical Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In my paper, I present two competing perspectives on the foundational problem (as opposed to the descriptive problem) of quantifier domain restriction: the objective perspective on context (OPC) and the intentional perspective on context (IPC). According to OPC, the relevant domain for a quantified sentence is determined by objective facts of the context of utterance. In contrast, according to IPC, we must consider certain features of the speaker’s intention in order to determine the proposition expressed. My goal is to offer a plausible and fair reconstruction of IPC. Drawing a parallel between quantifier domain restriction and standard cases of context dependence as indexicality, I argue that the speaker’s intentions can play a semantic role only if they satisfy an Availability Constraint: an intention must be made available or communicated to the addressee, and for that purpose the speaker can exploit any feature of the objective context (words, gestures, relevance or uniqueness of either the quantificational domain or of the referent in the context of utterance). An intention satisfying the Availability Constraint must be something that a hearer in normal circumstances is able to work out by relying on the physical surroundings of the utterance situation, on utterances exchanged during the previous conversation, and on background knowledge shared by speaker and addressee.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • J. Almog J. Perry H. Wettstein (Eds) (1989) Themes from Kaplan Oxford University Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Bach (1992a) ArticleTitle‘Paving the road to reference’ Philosophical Studies 67 295–300 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00354541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • K. Bach (1992b) ArticleTitle‘Intentions and Demonstrations’ Analysis 52 IssueID3 140–146 Occurrence Handle10.2307/3328374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • K. Bach R.M. Harnish (1979) Linguistic Communications and Speech Acts MIT Press Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Bach R.M. Harnish (1992) ArticleTitle‘How Performatives Really Work: A Reply to Searle’ Linguistics and Philosophy 15 93–110 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00635834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C. Bianchi (2001a) La dipendenza contestuale. Per una teoria pragmatica del significato Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane Napoli

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Bianchi (2001b) ‘Context of Utterance and Intended Context’ V. Akman (Eds) et al. Modeling and Using Context. Third International and Interdisciplinary Conference, CONTEXT ‘01 Springer Berlin 73–86

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Bianchi (2003) ‘How to Refer: Objective Context vs. IntentionalContext’ P. Blackburn (Eds) et al. Modeling and Using Context. Fourth International and Interdisciplinary Conference, CONTEXT ‘03, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence NumberInSeriesVol. 2680 Springer Berlin 54–65

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Bianchi (Eds) (2004) The Semantics/Pragmatics Distinction CSLI Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Clark (1992) Arenas of Language Use The University of Chicago Press & CSLI Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Donnellan (1968) ArticleTitle‘Putting Humpty Dumpty Together Again’ The Philosophical Review 77 203–215 Occurrence Handle10.2307/2183321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Garcia-Carpintero (1998) ArticleTitle‘Indexicals as Token-Reflexives’ Mind 107 529–563 Occurrence Handle10.1093/mind/107.427.529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C. Gauker (1997) ArticleTitle‘Domain of Discourse’ Mind 106 1–32 Occurrence Handle10.1093/mind/106.421.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C. Gauker (1998a) ArticleTitle‘What is a context of utterance?’ Philosophical Studies 91 149–172 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1004247202476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C. Gauker (1998b) ArticleTitle‘Intelligibility in Semantics: Reply to van Deemter’ Mind 107 447–450 Occurrence Handle10.1093/mind/107.426.447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C. Gauker (2001) ArticleTitle‘Situated Inference versus Conversational Implicature’ Nous 35 IssueID2 163–189 Occurrence Handle10.1111/0029-4624.00292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • B. Hale C. Wright (Eds) (1997) A Companion to the Philosophy of Language Blackwell Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, D. (1977): ‘Demonstratives. An Essay on the Semantics, Logic, Metaphysics, and Epistemology of Demonstratives and Other Indexicals’, in J. Almog et al. (1989), pp. 481–563.

  • Kaplan, D. (1978): ‘Dthat’, in P. French, T. Uehling and H. Wettstein (eds.), (1979): Contemporary Perspectives in the Philosophy of Language, pp. 383–400.

  • Kaplan, D. (1989). ‘Afterthoughts’. in J. Almog et al. (1989), pp. 565–614.

  • Penco, C. (2004): ‘Context and Contract’, in P. Bouquet et al. (eds.), Contexts, Stanford: CSLI, forthcoming.

  • Perry, J. (1997): ‘Indexicals and Demonstratives’, in Hale and Wright (1997), pp. 586–612.

  • M. Reimer (1991a) ArticleTitle‘Demonstratives, Demonstrations, and Demonstrata’ Philosophical Studies 67 187–202 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00381687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Reimer (1991b) ArticleTitle‘Do Demonstratives Have Semantic Significance?’ Analysis 51 IssueID4 177–183 Occurrence Handle10.2307/3328751

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Reimer (1998) ArticleTitle‘Quantification and Context’ Linguistics and Philosophy 21 95–115 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1005387824428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • L. Roberts (1993) How Reference Works. Explanatory Models for Indexicals, Descriptions, and Opacity State University of New York Press Albany

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Roberts (1997) ArticleTitle‘How Demonstrations Connect with Referential Intentions’ Australasian Journal of Philosophy 75 IssueID2 190–200 Occurrence Handle10.1080/00048409712347791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Sbisà (2002a) ‘Il contesto fra dimensione cognitiva e oggettività’ P. Parrini (Eds) Conoscenza e cognizione. Tra filosofia e scienza cognitiva Guerini Milano 243–256

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Sbisà (2002b) ArticleTitle‘Speech acts in context’ Language and Communication 2 421–436 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0271-5309(02)00018-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stalnaker, R. (1997): ‘Reference and Necessity’ in Hale and Wright (1997), pp. 534–554.

  • R. Stalnaker (1999) Context and Content Oxford University Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Stanley Z. Szabò (2000) ArticleTitle‘On Quantifier Domain Restriction’ Mind and Language 15 IssueID2 219–261 Occurrence Handle10.1111/1468-0017.00130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ch. Travis (1981) The True and the False: the Domain of Pragmatics Benjamins Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Deemter Particlevan (1998) ArticleTitle‘Domains of Discourse and the Semantics of Ambiguous Utterances: A Reply to Gauker’ Mind 107 443–445

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claudia Bianchi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bianchi, C. ‘Nobody Loves Me’: Quantification and Context. Philos Stud 130, 377–397 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-004-5749-1

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-004-5749-1

Keywords

Navigation