Abstract
In this paper I explore the relationship between teaching and learning. Whereas particularly in the English language the relationship between teaching and learning has become so intimate that it often looks as if ‘teaching and learning’ has become one word, I not only argue for the importance of keeping teaching and learning apart from each other, but also provide a number of arguments for suggesting that learning may not be the one and only option for teaching to aim for. I explore this idea through a discussion of the relationship between teaching and learning, both at a conceptual and at an existential level. I discuss the limitations of the language of learning as an educational language, point at the political work that is being done through the language of learning, and raise epistemological and existential questions about the identity of the learner, particularly with regard to the question what it means to be in and with the world in terms of learning as comprehension and sense making. Through this I seek to suggest that learning is only one possible aim for teaching and that the learner identity and the learning way of engaging with the world puts the learner in a very specific position vis-à-vis the world, one where the learner remains in the centre and the world appears as object for the learner’s acts of learning. That it is possible to teach without requesting from students that they learn, comprehend and make sense, is demonstrated through a brief account of a course in which students were explicitly asked to refrain from learning and were instead asked to adopt a concept. I show how this request opened up very different existential possibilities for the students and argue that if we value such existential possibilities, there may be good reasons for freeing teaching from learning.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Biesta, G. J. J. (2009). Good education in an age of measurement: On the need to reconnect with the question of purpose in education. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 33–46.
Biesta, G. J. J. (2010a). Learner, student, speaker. Why it matters how we call those we teach. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 42(4), 540–552.
Biesta, G. J. J. (2010b). Good education in an age of measurement: Ethics, politics, democracy. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.
Biesta, G. J. J. (2011). The ignorant citizen: Mouffe, Rancière, and the subject of democratic education. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 30(2), 141–153.
Biesta, G. J. J. (2012a). Giving teaching back to education Responding to the disappearance of the teacher. Phenomenology and Practice, 6(2), 35–49.
Biesta, G. J. J. (2012b). No education without hesitation. Thinking differently about educational relations. In C. Ruitenberg, et al. (Eds.), Philosophy of education 2012 (pp. 1–13). PES: Urbana-Champaign, IL.
Biesta, G. J. J. (2013). Interrupting the politics of learning. Power and Education, 5(1), 4–15.
Biesta, G. J. J. (2014). The beautiful risk of education. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.
Dewey, J. (1933). How we think. A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Boston, MA: D.C. Heath and Company.
Faure, E., et al. (1972). Learning to be. The world of education today and tomorrow. Paris: UNESCO.
Fenstermacher, G. D. (1986). Philosophy of research on teaching: Three aspects. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 37–49). New York: MacMillan.
Field, J. (2000). Lifelong learning and the new educational order. Trentham: Stoke-on-Trent.
Gordon, D. (2012). Continental divide: Heidegger, Cassirer, Davos. Harvard, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hodkinson, Ph, Biesta, G. J. J., & James, D. (2008). Understanding learning culturally: Overcoming the dualism between social and individual views of learning. Vocations and Learning, 1(1), 27–47.
Ileris, K. (2008). Contemporary theories of learning. London: Routledge.
Komisar, P. (1968). Teaching: Act and enterprise. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 6(2), 168–193.
Levinas, E. (1978). Otherwise than being or beyond essence (trans: Lingis, A.). Dordrecht, MA: Kluwer.
MacMillan, C. J. B., & Nelson, T. (Eds.). (1968). Concepts of teaching. Chicago: Rand McNally.
Noddings, N. (2012). Philosophy of education (3rd ed.). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Peters, R. S. (1967). What is an educational process? In R. S. Peters (Ed.), The concept of education (pp. 1–23). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Richardson, V. (2003). Constructivist pedagogy. Teachers College Record, 105(9), 1623–1640.
Rogers, G. (1969). Freedom to learn. A view of what education might become. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
Roth, W.-M. (2011). Passability. At the limits of the constructivist metaphor. Dordrecht: Springer Science & Business Media.
Ryle, G. (1952). The concept of mind. London: Hutchinsons.
Yang, J., & Valdés-Cotera, R. (Eds.). (2011). Conceptual evolution and policy developments in lifelong learning. Hamburg: UNESCO Institute for Lifelong Learning.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Biesta, G. Freeing Teaching from Learning: Opening Up Existential Possibilities in Educational Relationships. Stud Philos Educ 34, 229–243 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-014-9454-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-014-9454-z