Abstract
In the paper, the proof of the non-locality of quantum mechanics, given by Bedford and Stapp (1995), and appealing to the GHZ example, is analyzed. The proof does not contain any explicit assumption of realism, but instead it uses formal methods and techniques of the Lewis calculus of counterfactuals. To ascertain the validity of the proof, a formal semantic model for counterfactuals is constructed. With the help of this model it can be shown that the proof is faulty, because it appeals to the unwarranted principle of “elimination of eliminated conditions” (EEC). As an additional way of showing unreasonableness of the assumption (EEC), it is argued that yet another alleged and highly controversial proof of non-locality of QM, using the Hardy example, can be made almost trivial with the help of (EEC). Finally, a general argument is produced to the effect that the locality condition in the form accepted by Stapp and Bedford is consistent with the quantum-mechanical predictions for the GHZ case under the assumption of indeterminism. This result undermines any future attempts of proving the incompatibility between the predictions of quantum theory and the idea of no faster-than-light influence in the GHZ case, quite independently of the negative assessment of the particular derivation proposed by Stapp and Bedford.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Auletta G. (2000) Foundations and Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics. World Scientific, Singapore – New Jersey – London – Hong Kong
Bedford D., Stapp H.P. (1995) Bell’s Theorem in an Indeterministic Universe. Synthese 102: 139–164
Bigaj T. (2004a) Counterfactuals and Spatiotemporal Events. Synthese 142(1): 1–20
Bigaj, T.: 2004b, Counterfactual Logic and the Hardy Paradox: Remarks on Shimony and Stein’s Criticism of Stapp’s Proof. Preprint, Philosophy of Science Archive, Pittsburgh, http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/archive/00001771/
Clifton R., Butterfield J., Redhead M. (1990) Nonlocal Influences and Possible Worlds. British Journal for the Philosophy Science 41: 5–58
Finkelstein, J.: 1998, Yet Another Comment on Nonlocal Character of Quantum Theory. Preprint quant-ph/9801011
Finkelstein J. (1999) Space-time Counterfactuals. Synthese 119: 287–298
Greenberger, D. Horne M. A. Shimony, and A. Zeilinger: 1990, Bell’s Theorem without Inequalities. American Journal of Physics 58(1): 131–143
Hardy L. (1992) Quantum Mechanics, Local Realistic Theories, and Lorentz-invariant Realistic Theories. Physical Review Letters 68: 2981–2984
Jarrett J.P. (1984) On the Physical Significance of the Locality Conditions in the Bell Arguments. Noûs 18: 569–589
Lewis D. (1973) Counterfactuals. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Lewis D. (1986) Philosophical Papers Vol II. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Maudlin T. (1994). Quantum Non-locality and Relativity. Blackwell, Oxford
Mermin D. (1998) Nonlocal Character of Quantum Theory?. American Journal of Physics 66(10): 920–924
Placek T. (2000) Is Nature Deterministic? A Branching Perspective on EPR Phenomena. Jagiellonian University Press, Krakow
Shimony A., Stein H. (2001) Comment on “Nonlocal Character of Quantum Theory” by Henry P. Stapp. American Journal of Physics 69: 848–853
Shimony A., Stein H. (2003) On Quantum Non-locality, Special Relativity, and Counterfactual Reasoning. In: Ashtekar A. et al. (eds) Revisiting the Foundations of Relativistic Physics. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 499–521
Stapp H. (1971) S-matrix Interpretation of Quantum Theory. Physical Review 3D: 1303–1320
Stapp H. (1989) Quantum Nonlocality and the Description of Nature. In: Cushing J., McMullin E. (eds) Philosophical Consequences of Quantum Theory: Reflections on Bell’s Theorem. University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame
Stapp H. (1991) Quantum Measurement and the Mind-Brain Connection. In: Lahti P., Mittelstaedt P. (eds) Symposium on the Foundations of Modern Physics 1990. World Scientific, Singapore – New Jersey – London – Hong Kong
Stapp H. (1997) Nonlocal Character of Quantum Theory. American Journal of Physics 65: 300–304
Stapp H. (1998) Meaning of Counterfactual Statements in Quantum Physics. American Journal of Physics 66(10): 924–926
Stapp H. (1999) Comments on “Non-locality, Counterfactuals, and Quantum Mechanics”. Physical Review A 60(3): 2595–2598
Stalnaker R.C. (1968) A Theory of Conditionals. In: Rescher N. (eds) Studies in Logical Theory. Blackwell, Oxford
Redhead M. (1987) Non-locality, Incompleteness and Realism. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Unruh W. (1999) Nonlocality, Counterfactuals, and Quantum Mechanics. Physical Review A 59: 126–130
van Fraassen B. (1991) Quantum Mechanics. An Empiricist View. Clarendon Press, Oxford
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bigaj, T. Counterfactuals and Non-locality of Quantum Mechanics: The Bedford–Stapp Version of the GHZ Theorem. Found Sci 12, 85–108 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-006-0006-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-006-0006-z