Abstract
This article explores the celebratory aspect of psychological theories. In particular, it examines the celebration of dialogue, argumentation, and negativity, which is contained within recent critical theories of psychology. This psychological approach is compared with cognitive psychology's celebration of monologue. The relations between dialogical/rhetorical psychology and feminist critiques are examined. Following Habermas, it is suggested that it is necessary to point to instances of unconstrained argumentation in order to show that the utopian elements in the celebration of argument are based upon a realized psychology. It is suggested that one can look to the voices of women for such instances, in order to avoid incorporating patriarchal structures into the celebration. One such instance reveals the self-reflexivity of argumentation, and that the celebration of argument also involves preserving argumentation's ‘other’. Thus, the resulting argumentative psychology should not only be self-reflexive but should itself express and preserve its own sense of otherness.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bakhtin, M.M.: 1981,The Dialogic Imagination, University of Texas Press, Austin.
Bakhtin, M.M.: 1986,Speech Genres and Other Late Essays, Austin, University of Texas Press, Austin.
Billig, M.: 1987,Arguing and Thinking, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Billig, M.: 1990, ‘Rhetoric of social psychology’, in I. Parker and J. Shotter (eds.),Deconstructing Social Psychology, Routledge, London, pp. 47–60.
Billig, M.: 1991,Ideology and Opinions, Sage, London.
Billig, M.: 1992, ‘Gender and the Revival of Rhetoric: Recovering the Memory of Aspasia’, unpub. ms., University of Loughborough.
Billig, M., Condor, S., Edwards, D., Gane, M., Middleton, D. and A.R. Radley: 1988,Ideological Dilemmas: A Social Psychology of Everyday Thinking, Sage, London.
Cushman, D.P. and Tompkins, P.K.: 1980, ‘A Theory of Rhetoric for Contemporary Society’,Philosophy and Rhetoric 13, 43–67.
Defrancisco, V.L.: 1991, ‘The Sounds of Silence: How Men Silence Women in Marital Relations’,Discourse and Society 2, 413–424.
DuBois, P.: 1988,Sowing the Body, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Eder, D.: 1990, ‘Serious and Playful Disputes: Variations in Conflict Talk among Female Adolescents’, in A.D. Grimshaw (ed.),Conflict Talk, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Edwards, D.: 1991 ‘Categories are for Talking’,Theory and Psychology 1, 515–542.
Edwards, D. and J. Potter: 1992,Discursive Psychology, Sage, London.
Falbo, T. and L.A. Peplau: 1980, ‘Power Strategies in Intimate Relationships’,Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 38, 618–624.
Foppa, K.: 1990, ‘Topic Progression and Intention’, in I. Markova and K. Foppa (eds.),The Dynamics of Dialogue, Harvester/ Wheatsheaf, Hemel Hempstead, pp. 178–200.
Foppa, K. and Markova, I.: 1990,The Dynamics of Dialogue, Harvester/Wheatsheaf, Hemel Hempstead.
Fraser, N.: 1989,Unruly Practices, Polity Press, Cambridge.
Gergen, K.J.: 1985, ‘The Social Constructionist Movement in Modern Psychology,American Psychologist 40, 266–275.
Gergen, K.J.: 1989, ‘Social Psychology and the Wrong Revolution’,European Journal of Social Psychology 19, 436–484.
Gilligan, C.: 1982,In a Different Voice, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Habermas, J.: 1976,Legitimation Crisis, Heinemann, London.
Habermas, J.: 1984,The Theory of Communicative Action, volume one, Polity Press, Cambridge.
Habermas, J.: 1985, ‘Modernity - an Incomplete Project’, in H. Foster (ed.),Postmodern Culture, Pluto, London, pp. 3–15.
Harding, S.: 1989, ‘Feminist Justificatory Strategies’, in A. Gary and M. Pearsall (eds.),Women, Knowledge and Reality, Unwin Hyman, Boston, pp. 189–201.
Hollway, W.: 1989,Subjectivity and Method in Psychology, Sage, London.
Holmes, J.: 1992. ‘Women's Talk in Public Contexts’,Discourse and Society 3, 133–150.
Irigaray, L.: 1985,This Sex Which Is Not One, Cornell University Press, Ithaca.
Irigaray, L.: 1986, ‘Women, the Sacred and Money’,Paragraph 8, 6–18.
Keller, E.F.: 1985,Reflections on Gender and Science, Yale University Press, New Haven.
Kristeva, J.: 1986,The Kristeva Reader, Blackwell, Oxford.
Longino, H.E.: 1990, ‘Can There be a Feminist Science?’ in A. Gary and M. Pearsall (eds.),Women, Knowledge and Reality, Unwin Hyman, Boston, pp. 203–216.
Lopes, L.L.: 1991, ‘The Rhetoric of Irrationality’,Theory and Psychology 1, 65–82.
Mapstone, E.R.: 1992, ‘Rational Men and Disagreeable Women: The Social Construction of Argument’, Ph.D. thesis, Department of Psychology, University of Oxford.
Myers, G.: 1990,Writing Biology, University of Wisconsin Press, Madison.
Nelson, J.S., Megill, A. and D.N. McCloskey: 1987,The Rhetoric of the Human Sciences, University of Wisconsin Press, Madison.
Ong, W.J.: 1989,Fighting for Life, University of Massachusetts Press, Amherst.
Parker, I.: 1992,Discourse Dynamics, Routledge, London.
Plato, 1969: ‘Phaedo’, in Plato,The Last Days of Socrates, Penguin, Harmondsworth, pp. 97–103.
Potter, J.: 1988, ‘What is Reflexive About Discourse Analysis? - The Case of Reading Readings’, in S. Woolgar (ed.),Knowledge and Reflexivity, Sage, London.
Potter, J. and Wetherell, M.: 1987,Discourse and Social Psychology, Sage, London.
Shotter, J.: 1990,Knowing of the Third Kind, ISOR, Utrecht.
Shotter, J.: 1991, ‘Rhetoric and the Social Construction of Cognitivism’,Theory and Psychology 1, 495–513.
Shotter, J. and Gergen, K.J. (eds.): 1989,The Texts of Identity, Sage, London.
Simons, H.W.: 1990, ‘The Rhetoric of Inquiry as an Intellectual Movement’, in H.W. Simons (ed.),The Rhetorical Turn, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 1–31).
Smith, D.E.: 1991, ‘Writing Women's Experience into Social Science’,Feminism and Psychology 1, 155–169.
Squire, C.: 1989,Significant Differences: Feminism in Psychology, Routledge, London.
Tannen, D.: 1991,You Just Don't Understand, William Morrow, New York.
Wertsch, J.V.: 1991,Voices of the Mind, Wheatsheaf, Sussex.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Billig, M. Celebrating argument within psychology: Dialogue, negation, and feminist critique. Argumentation 8, 49–61 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00710703
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00710703