Skip to main content
Log in

Minding the Gap: Detachment and Understanding in Aleksej Losev's Dialektika mifa

  • Published:
Studies in East European Thought Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aleksej Losev's definition of myth centres onthe concept of detachment. In modern timesdetachment has most often figured in thecontext of philosophical aesthetics, where itis a cognitive category akin to Kant's``disinterestedness'' or the Russian formalists'``estrangement.'' However Losev's usage alsomakes reference to the ontological sense ofdetachment as contemplativeascent (cf. Meister Eckhardt'sAbgeschiedenheit). Thus, Losev's concept ofmyth combines both senses of detachment,binding perceptual attitude and being togetherin a double movement of resignation from theworld and union with meaning; this movementliterally makes sense out of reality. Ittherefore bears comparison to the treatment ofdistanciation in contemporary hermeneutics,where detachment is a key condition ofunderstanding. By investigating Losev'sconnections to other Russian thinkers, theauthor makes a case for a distinct Russiantradition of hermeneutic philosophy (V. Ivanov,G. Shpet, A. Bakshy, A. Losev).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Adorno, Theodor W. Ästhetische Theorie, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakshy, Alexander. The Path of the Modern Russian Stage and Other Essays, John W. Luce & Company, Boston, 1918.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassirer, Ernst. Philosophie der Symbolischen Formen. Zweiter Teil: Das Mythische Denken, Bruno Cassirer, Oxford, 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dilthey, Wilhelm. Selected Works. Volume V. Poetry and Experience, Rudolf A. Makkreel and Frithjof Rodi (eds.), Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giesz, Ludwig. Die Phänomenologie des Kitsches, 2nd edn., Fink, Munich, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guyer, Paul. “Disinterestedness and Desire in Kant's Aesthetics,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 36(4) (1978), pp. 449-460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harries, Karsten. The Meaning of Modern Art, Northwestern University Press, Evanston, IL, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, G.W.F. Aesthetics: Lectures on Fine Art, T.M. Knox (trans.), Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivanov, Vjacheslav. Sobranie sochinenij, 4 vols, Foyer oriental chrétien, Brussels, 1971–1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivanov, Viacheslav. Selected Essays, Robert Bird (trans.), Michael Wachtel (ed.), Northwestern University Press, Evanston, IL, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jauss, Hans Robert. Aesthetic Experience and Literary Hermeneutics, Michael Shaw (trans.), Introduction by Wlad Godzich, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • John Climacus. The Ladder of Divine Ascent, Colm Luibheid and Norman Russell (trans.), Introduction by Kallistos Ware, Preface by Colm Luibheid, Paulist Press, New York, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, Immanuel. The Critique of Judgement, James Creed Meredith (trans.), Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  • Losev, A.F. Bytie. Imja. Kosmos, Mysl', Rossijskij otkrytyj universitet, Moscow, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Losev, Aleksej Fedorovich. Dialektika mifa: Dopolnenie k “Dialektike mifa”, Mysl', Moscow, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meister Eckhardt. Meister Eckhart. A Modern Translation, Raymond Bernard Blakney (trans.), Harper & Brothers, New York, 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. Sense and Non-Sense, Hubert L. Dreyfus and Patricia Allen Dreyfus (trans.), Northwestern University Press, Evanston, IL, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleu-Ponty, Maurice. Phenomenology of Perception, Colin Smith (trans.), Routledge, London/New York, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odin, Steve. Artistic Detachment in Japan and the West: Psychic Distance in Comparative Aesthetics, University of Hawaii Press, Honolulu, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricoeur, Paul. “The Hermeneutical Function of Distanciation,” From Text to Action. Essays on Hermeneutics, II, Kathleen Blamey and John B. Thompson (trans.), Northwestern University Press, Evanston, IL, 1991, pp. 75-88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shklovskij, Viktor. O teorii prozy, Sovetskij pisatel', Moscow, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shpet, G.G. “Germenevtika i ee problemy,” in E.V. Pasternak (ed.), Kontekst-1991. Literaturno-teoreticheskie issledovaniia, Nauka, Moscow, 1993, pp. 215-255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shpet, G.G. “Germenevtika i ee problemy,” in E.V. Pasternak (ed.), Kontekst-1992. Literaturno-teoreticheskie issledovaniia, Nauka, Moscow, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shpet, G.G. Psikhologiia sotsial'nogo bytiia, Voronezh, Moscow, 1996.

  • Shpet, G.G. Istoriia kak predmet logiki, Moscow, 2002.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bird, R. Minding the Gap: Detachment and Understanding in Aleksej Losev's Dialektika mifa . Studies in East European Thought 56, 143–160 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SOVI.0000021884.08778.52

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SOVI.0000021884.08778.52

Navigation