Abstract
Trust is a critical component of research: trust in the work of co-workers and colleagues within the scientific community; trust in the work of research scientists by the non-research community. A wide range of factors, including internally and externally generated pressures and practical and personal limitations, affect the research process. The extent to which these factors are understood and appreciated influence the development of trust in scientific research findings.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
This paper is derived from work included inHandling Research Responsibly: Issues for Scientists and Engineers created by the National Science Foundation Consortium for the Production of Educational Modules for the Teaching of Research Ethics, funded by NSF SBR9213642 and edited by Deni Elliott, Robert Arzbaecher, Edward M. Berger, Stephanie J. Bird, Jeffrey L. Doering, Bernard Gert, David E. Housman, Judith Swazey, Vivian Weil and Patricia Werhane.
Prepared by Eve K. Nichols (Whitehead Institute, MIT) and Stephanie J. Bird with David E. Housman.
Guertin R P (1995) Commentary on: How are scientific corrections made? (by N. Kiang).Science and Engineering Ethics 1: 357–359.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bird, S.J., Housman, D.E. Trust and the collection, selection, analysis and interpretation of data: A scientist’s view. Sci Eng Ethics 1, 371–382 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02583255
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02583255