Skip to main content
Log in

The role of professional societies: Codes of conduct and their enforcement

  • Published:
Science and Engineering Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In discussions of professional standards and ethical values it is reasonable to consider who will develop the codes of conduct and guidelines for behavior that will reflect the standards and values of the community. Also worthy of consideration is whether the standards or guidelines are enforceable, and how and to what extent they will be enforced. The development of guidelines or professional codes of conduct is a responsibility that has been adopted by many professional societies. Useful to this discussion is an examination of the rationale behind the development of ethical codes by professional societies. The Ethics in Science Committee of the Council of Scientific Society Presidents (CSSP) has examined the codes of some of its member societies and some observations regarding them are pertinent. The nature and uses of ethical statements, codes and guidelines developed by professional societies are multiple and diverse. Their enforcement raises both practical and ethical concerns.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Davis, M. (1995) An Historical Preface to Engineering Ethics, Science and Engineering Ethics 1: 33–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bird, S.J. (1997) The role of science professionals in teaching responsible research conduct. Bioscience 46: 783–786.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Alberts, B. & Shine, K. (1994) Scientists and the Integrity of Research. Science 266: 1660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Council of Scientific Society Presidents (1995) Society Policies on Ethics Issues. Council of Scientific Society Presidents, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jorgensen, A. (1995) Survey shows professional societies have developed policies on ethical issues, but enforcement mechanisms are lacking. Professional Ethics Report 8 (1): 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Frankel, M. (1996) Developing Ethical Standards for Responsible Research: Why? Form? Functions? Process? and Outcomes?, Journal of Dental Research 75: 832–835.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Unger, S.H. (1991). Codes of Engineering Ethics, in: Johnson, D.G. (ed.) Ethical Issues in Engineering, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Harris, C.E., Pritchard, M.S. & Rabins, M.J. (1995) Engineering Ethics: Concepts and Cases. Wadsworth Publishing Co., Belmont, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Anderson, R.E., Johnson, D.G., Gotterbarn, D. & Perrolle, J. (1993) ACM Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct: Using the New ACM Code of Ethics in Decision Making, Communications of the ACM 36 (2): 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sieber, J.E. (1998) The Psychology of Whistleblowing, Science and Engineering Ethics 4: 7–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. McKnight, D.M. (1998) Scientific societies and whistleblowers: The relationship between the community and the individual, Science and Engineering Ethics 4: 97–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Abeles, N. (1998) Commentary on “Scientific Societies and Whistleblowers: the Relationship between the Community and the Individual” (by McKnight), Science and Engineering Ethics 4: 115–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bird, S.J. The role of professional societies: Codes of conduct and their enforcement. SCI ENG ETHICS 4, 315–320 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-998-0023-0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-998-0023-0

Keywords

Navigation