Abstract
Kellert (In the Wake of Chars, University of Chicago press, Chicago, 1993) has argued that Laplacean determinism in classical physics is actually a layered concept, where various properties or layers composing this form of determinism can be peeled away. Here, I argue that a layered conception of determinism is inappropriate and that we should think in terms of different deterministic models applicable to different kinds of systems. The upshot of this analysis is that the notion of state is more closely tied to the kind of system being investigated than is usually considered in discussions of determinism. So when investigating determinism corresponding changes to the appropriate notion of state – and, perhaps, the state space itself – also need to be considered.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
D. Albert (2000) Time and Chance Harvard University Press Cambridge, MA
Atmanspacher H. (1994). ‘Is the Ontic/Epistemic Distinction Sufficient to Describe Quantum Systems Exhaustively?’. In: Laurikainen K., Montonen C., Sunnarborg K. (ed). Symposium on the Foundations of Modern Physics 1994, Editions Frontières, Gif-sur-Yvette, pp. 15–32
H. Atmanspacher R.C. Bishop A. Amann (2002) ‘Extrinsic and Intrinsic Irreversibility in Probabilistic Dynamical Laws’ A. Khrennikov (Eds) Quantum Probability and White Noise Analysis Volume XIII. World Scientific Singapore 50–70
H. Atmanspacher F.K. Kronz (1999) ‘Relative Onticity’ H. Atmanspacher A. Amann U. Müller-Herold (Eds) On Quanta, Mind and Matter: Hans Primas in Context. Kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht 273–294
R.W. Batterman (1993) ArticleTitle‘Defining Chaos’ Philosophy of Science. 60 43–66 Occurrence Handle10.1086/289717
B. d’Espagnat (1994) Veiled Reality: An Analysis of Present-Day Quantum Mechanical Concepts Addison-Wesley Reading, MA
J. Earman (1986) A Primer on Determinism D. Reidel Publishing Dordrecht, The Netherlands
J. Earman (2002) ArticleTitle‘What Time Reversal Invariance Is and Why It Matters’ International Studies in the Philosophy of Science. 16 245–264 Occurrence Handle10.1080/0269859022000013328
A. Fine (1971) ‘Probability in Quantum Mechanics and Other Statistical Theories’ M. Bunge (Eds) Problems in the Foundations of Physics. Springer-Verlag New York 79–92
C. Glymour (1971) ArticleTitle‘Determinism, Ignorance, and Quantum Mechanics’ The Journal of Philosophy 68 744–751
J. Hobbs (1991) ArticleTitle‘Chaos and Indeterminism’ Canadian Journal of Philosophy 21 141–164
S. Kellert (1993) In the Wake of Chaos University of Chicago Press Chicago
P. Laplace (1814/1951) A Philosophical Essay on Probabilities Dover Publications New York
Montague R. (1974). Formal Philosophy: Selected Papers of Richard Montague, R. H. Thomason (ed.). Yale University Press, New Haven
H. Primas (1990) ‘Mathematical and Philosophical Questions in the Theory of Open and Macroscopic Quantum Systems’ A. Miller (Eds) Sixty-Two Years of Uncertainty. Plenum New York 233–257
M. Primas (1994) ‘Endo- and Exotheories of Matter’ H. Atmanspacher G. Dalenroot (Eds) Inside Versus Outside. Springer-Verlag Berlin 163–193
B. Russell (1953) ‘On the Notion of Cause, with Applications to the Free-Will Problem’ H. Feigl M. Brodbeck (Eds) Readings in the Philosophy of Science. Appleton-Century-Crofts Inc New York 387–418
E. Scheibe (1964/1973) The Logical Analysis of Quantum Mechanics Pergamon Press Oxford
M.A. Stone (1989) ArticleTitle‘Chaos, Prediction and Laplacean Determinism’ American Philosophical Quarterly 26 123–131
P. Teller (1979) ArticleTitle‘Quantum Mechanics and the Nature of Continuous Physical Magnitudes’ Journal of Philosophy 76 345–361
B. Fraassen Particlevan (1989) Laws and Symmetry Clarendon Press Oxford
B. Fraassen Particlevan (1991) Quantum Mechanics: An Empiricists View Clarendon Press Oxford
R.C. Bishop (2002) ‘Deterministic and Indeterministic Descriptions’ H. Atmanspacher R.C. Bishop (Eds) Between Chance and Choice. Imprint Academic Thorverton 5–31
R.C. Bishop (2003) ArticleTitle‘On Separating Predictability and Determinism’ Erkenntnis 58 169–188 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1022003805614
Bishop R.C.: submitted ‘What Could Be Worse than the Butterfly Effect?’
Bishop, R.C. and Kronz, F.K.:(1999). ‘Is Chaos Indeterministic?’ in M. Dalla Chiara, R. Guintini and f. Laudisa (eds.). Language, Quantum, Music: Selected Contributed Papers of the Tenth International Congress of Logic, Methodology & Philosophy of Science, Florence, August 1995, Kluwer Academic Publishers, London, pp. 129–41
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bishop, R.C. Anvil or Onion? Determinism as a Layered Concept. Erkenntnis 63, 55–71 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-005-0363-y
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-005-0363-y