Skip to main content
Log in

Concealed Causatives

  • Published:
Natural Language Semantics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Crosslinguistically, causative constructions conform to the following generalization: If the causal relation is syntactically concealed, then it is semantically direct. Concealed causatives span a wide syntactic spectrum, ranging from resultative complements in English to causative subjects in Miskitu. A unified type-driven theory is proposed which attributes the understood causal relation – and other elements of constructional meaning – to type lifting operations predictably licensed by type mismatch at LF. The proposal has far- reaching theoretical implications not only for the theory of compositionality and causation, but also for the underlying theory of events, space, and time in natural language discourse.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Abusch, D.: 1994, ‘The Scope of Indefinites’, Natural Language Semantics 2, 83–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abusch, D.: 1998, ‘Generalizing Tense Semantics for Future Contexts’, in S. Rothstein (ed.), Events and Grammar, Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bach, E.: 1986, ‘The Algebra of Events’, Linguistics and Philosophy 9, 5–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, C. L.: 1970, ‘Notes on the Description of English Questions: The Role of an Abstract Question Morpheme’, Foundations of Language 6, 169–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, J.: 1988, Events and Their Names, Hackett, Indianapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benthem, J. van: 1984, ‘The Logic of Semantics’, in F. Landman and F. Veltman (eds.), Varieties of Formal Semantics, pp. 55–80. Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bittner, M.: 1994a, Case, Scope, and Binding, Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bittner, M.: 1994b, ‘Cross-Linguistic Semantics’, Linguistics and Philosophy 17, 57–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bittner, M.: 1997a, ‘Correlatives and Other Concealed Descriptions’, ms., Rutgers University, NJ, and Institute for Advanced Studies, Hebrew University in Jerusalem.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bittner, M.: 1997b, ‘Compositional Semantics for Tense in English’, ms., Rutgers University, NJ, and Institute for Advanced Studies, Hebrew University in Jerusalem.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bittner, M.: 1998, ‘Cross-Linguistic Semantics for Questions’, Linguistics and Philosophy 21, 1–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bittner, M. and K. Hale: 1996a, ‘The Structural Determination of Case and Agreement’, Linguistic Inquiry 27, 1–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bittner, M. and K. Hale: 1996b, ‘Ergativity: Toward a Theory of a Heterogeneous Class’, Linguistic Inquiry 27, 531–604.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, G.: 1977, Reference to Kinds in English, PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrier, J. and J. Randall: 1992, ‘The Argument Structure and Syntactic Structure of Resultative’, Linguistic Inquiry 23, 173–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N.: 1981, Lectures on Government and Binding, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N.: 1986, Barriers, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Church, A.: 1940, ‘A Formulation of the Simple Theory of Types’, The Journal of Symbolic Logic 5, 56–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R.: 1985, Quantification and Syntactic Theory, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cresswell, M. and A. von Stechow: 1982, ‘De re Belief Generalized’, Linguistics and Philosophy 5, 503–536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dayal, V.: 1996, Locality in WH Quantification, Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dekker, P.: 1993, Transsentential Meditations, ILLC dissertation series, University of Amsterdam.

  • Dekker, P.: 1994, ‘Predicate Logic with Anaphora’, Proceedings of SALT IV, pp. 79–95. Cornell University.

  • Dowty, D.: 1979, Word Meaning and Montague Grammar, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engdahl, E.: 1986, Constituent Questions, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finer, D.: 1985, ‘The Syntax of Switch Reference’, Linguistic Inquiry 16, 35–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J.: 1970, ‘Three Reasons for Not Deriving “Kill” from “Cause to Die”’, Linguistic Inquiry 1, 429–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geenhoven, V. van: 1996, Semantic Incorporation and Indefinite Descriptions, SfS-Report–03-96, Seminar für Sprachwissenschaft, Universität Tübingen, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, A.: 1995, Constructions, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grice, H. P.: 1975, ‘Logic and Conversation’, in P. Cole and J. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3, pp. 41–58. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groenendijk, J. and M. Stokhof: 1984, Studies on the Semantics of Questions and the Pragmatics of Answers, PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam.

  • Groenendijk, J. and M. Stokhof: 1991, ‘Dynamic Predicate Logic’, Linguistics and Philosophy 14, 39–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haiman, J. and P. Munro (eds.): 1983, Switch Reference and Universal Grammar, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hale, K. L.: 1965, ‘Some Preliminary Observations on Papago Morphophonemics’, IJAL 31, 295–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hale, K. L.: 1989, ‘The Causative Construction in Miskitu’, in D. Jaspers et al. (eds.), Sentential Complementation and the Lexicon: Studies in Honour of Wim de Geest, pp. 189–205. Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hale, K. L.: 1991, ‘Misumalpan Verb Sequencing Constructions’, in C. Lefebvre (ed.), Serial Verbs, pp. 1–35. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heim, I.: 1982, The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases, PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendriks, H.: 1993, Studied Flexibility, ILLC dissertation series, University of Amsterdam.

  • Hintikka, J.: 1969, ‘Semantics for Propositional Attitudes’, in J. W. Davis (ed.), Philosophical Logic, pp. 21–45. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoekstra, T.: 1988, ‘Small Clause Results’, Lingua 74, 101–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, J.: 1988, ‘Wo pao de kuài and Chinese Phrase Structure’, Language 64, 274–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobsen, W.: 1967, ‘Switch-Reference in Hokan-Coahuiltecan’, in D. Hymes and W. Bittle (eds.), Studies in Southwestern Ethnolinguistics, Mouton, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, P.: 1992, ‘Antecedent Contained Deletion in a Variable-Free Semantics’, Proceedings of SALT II, pp. 193–214. Department of Linguistics, Ohio State University.

  • Kamp, H.: 1979, ‘Events, Instants and Temporal Reference’, in R. Bäuerle et al. (eds.), Semantics from Different Points of View, pp. 376–417. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamp, H.: 1981, ‘A Theory of Truth and Semantic Representation’, in J. Groenendijk et al. (eds.), Formal Methods in the Study of Language, pp. 277–322. Mathematical Centre, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamp, H. and U. Reyle: 1993, From Discourse to Logic, Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, D.: 1979, ‘On the Logic of Demonstratives’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 8, 81–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karttunen, L.: 1976, ‘Discourse Referents’, in J. McCawley (ed.), Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 7, pp. 363–385, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karttunen, L.: 1977, ‘Syntax and Semantics of Questions’, Linguistics and Philosophy 1, 3–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayne, R. S.: 1984, ‘Principles of Particle Constructions’, in J. Guéron et al. (eds.), Grammatical Representation, pp. 101–140. Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J.: 1973, ‘Causation, Nomic Subsumption, and the Concept of Event’, Journal of Philosophy 70, 217–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J.: 1976, ‘Events as Property Exemplifications’, in M. Brand and D. Walton (eds.), Action Theory, pp. 159–177. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kratzer, A.: 1979, ‘Conditional Necessity and Possibility’, in R. Bäuerle et al. (eds.), Semantics from Different Points of View, pp. 117–147. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kratzer, A.: 1981, ‘Partition and Revision: The Semantics of Counterfactuals’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kratzer, A.: 1991, ‘The Representation of Focus’, in A. von Stechow and D. Wunderlich (eds.), Semantics: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, pp. 825–834. de Gruyter, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, R.: 1988, ‘On the Double Object Construction’, Linguistic Inquiry 19, 335–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, B. & T. Rapoport: 1988, ‘Lexical Subordination’, in Papers from the Twenty-Fourth Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society, pp. 275–289. Chicago Linguistic Society, University of Chicago.

  • Levin, B. and M. Rappaport Hovav: 1995, Unaccusativity, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D.: 1973, ‘Causation’, Journal of Philosophy 70, 556–567.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D.: 1975, ‘Adverbs of Quantification’, in E. Keenan (ed.), Formal Semantics of Natural Language, pp. 3–15. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D.: 1981, ‘Ordering Semantics and Premise Semantics for Counterfactuals’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 217–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y.-F.: 1990, ‘X0-Binding and Verb Incorporation’, Linguistic Inquiry 21, 399–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Link, G.: 1987, ‘Generalized Quantifiers and Plurals’, in P. Gärdenfors (ed.), Generalized Quantifiers, pp. 151–180, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, R.: 1977, The Grammar of Quantification, PhD dissertation, MIT.

  • McCawley, J.: 1971, ‘Pre-Lexical Syntax’, in O'Brien (ed.), Report of the 22nd Roundtable Meeting on Linguistics and Language Studies, pp. 19–33. Georgetown University Press.

  • Montague, R.: 1973, ‘The Proper Treatment of Quantification in Ordinary English’, in J. Hintikka et al. (eds.), Approaches to Natural Language, pp. 221–242. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partee, B.: 1973, ‘Some Structural Analogies between Tenses and Pronouns in English’, Journal of Philosophy 70, 601–609.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partee, B.: 1984, ‘Nominal and Temporal Anaphora’, Linguistics and Philosophy 7, 243–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partee, B.: 1986, ‘Ambiguous Pseudoclefts with Unambiguous “Be”’, Proceedings of NELS 16, pp. 354–366. GLSA, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partee, B.: 1987, ‘Noun Phrase Interpretation and Type-Shifting Principles’, in J. Groenendijk et al. (eds.), Studies in Discourse Representation Theory and the Theory of Generalized Quantifiers, pp. 115–144. Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichenbach, H.: 1947, Elements of Symbolic Logic, paperback edition 1966, Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rooth, M.: 1992, ‘A Theory of Focus Interpretation’, Natural Language Semantics 1, 75–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rooth, M. and B. Partee: 1982, ‘Conjunction, Type Ambiguity, and Wide Scope “Or”’, Proceedings of WCCFL 1, pp. 353–362. Linguistics Department, Stanford University, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein, S.: 1983, The Syntactic Forms of Predication, PhD dissertation, MIT. [Published in 1985 by Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Rullman, H.: 1995, Maximality in the Semantics of WH-Constructions, PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B.: 1956, ‘On Order in Time’, in B. Russell (ed.), Logic and Knowledge, pp. 345–363. Unwin Hyman, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, J.: 1983, ‘Resultatives’, in L. Levin et al. (eds.), Papers in Lexical-Functional Grammar, Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stalnaker, R.: 1975, ‘Indicative Conditionals’, Philosophia 5, 269–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stalnaker, R.: 1978, ‘Assertion’, in P. Cole (ed.), Syntax and Semantic 9: Pragmatics, pp. 315–322. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stowell, T.: 1981, Origins of Phrase Structure, PhD dissertation, MIT.

  • Stowell, T.: 1983, ‘Subjects Across Categories’, The Linguistic Review 2, 285–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sybesma, R.: 1992, Causatives and Accomplishments: The Case of Chinese “Ba”, Holland Institute of Generative Linguistics, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiener, N.: 1914, ‘A Contribution to the Theory of Relative Position’, in Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc., Vol. 17, pp. 441–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, E.: 1980, ‘Predication’, Linguistic Inquiry 11, 203–238.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bittner, M. Concealed Causatives. Natural Language Semantics 7, 1–78 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008313608525

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008313608525

Keywords

Navigation